Alfred Howell
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2019-0116
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 4 Aug 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Concerns related to the process of identifying and responding to a patient's deteriorating lung condition, noted through serial CT scans and MDT reviews.
View full coroner's concerns
The matter of concern is as follows _ During investigations into Mr Howell's medical condition, CT scans were taken on a number of occasions. Specifically, he underwent a CT scan on March 2018 which was reported on by the radiology department on 7th April 2018_ Upon review at an MDT on 17th April 2018,a deterioration of the changes previously seen in both lungs was noted. An MDT plan was then to perform an early _follow Up CT to assess whether the changes might improve
Responses
Noted
The Trust acknowledges the coroner's concerns regarding radiology reporting turnaround times but states that there are no national standards. The Trust prioritizes resources to acute, clinically urgent, and cancer pathways, and routine outpatient work may wait longer. (AI summary)
The Trust acknowledges the coroner's concerns regarding radiology reporting turnaround times but states that there are no national standards. The Trust prioritizes resources to acute, clinically urgent, and cancer pathways, and routine outpatient work may wait longer. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Hobson RE: Inquest touching the death of Mr Alfred Howell Regulation 28 Report On behalf of the Trust, am truly sorry that you identifjed areas of concern with regard to the timeliness of reporting in our radiology department: The Trust is committed to continuing to improve our services and the experience of patients: The matter of concern that you raise was "that upon the evidence that the reporting of scans fell outwith an aimed for timescale of 5 days and could impact the treatment of patients in the future Evidence the inquest did not indicate that this had made any contribution to Mr Howell's death. Radiology reporting tumaround time has been under pressure for some time now due to rapidly rising demand and limitations of the available trained workforce nationally to deliver the reporting workload. A variety of strategies are in place locally and nationally to manage this pressure such as radiographer reporting and outsourcing to private companies. There are no national standards for radiology reporting turaround times: The prioritisation of image acquisition and reporting has t0 be tailored for different pathways, for example whilst it may be acceptable that outpatient reports are not provided on the of acquisition this is clearly not acceptable for emergency department patients. As there is no nationally mandated standard for the reporting turnaround of examinations at Mid Yorkshire NHS Hospitals we apply our own guidance on the expected reporting turnaround times of radiology examinations Different priority is given to different examinations depending on the modality CT, MRI; Ultrasound), urgency of the request (as indicated by the referrer) and the referral source e.g: Emergency Department; Inpatient vs outpatient & GP referral: We are also asked to prioritise patients on fast track cancer pathways meaning Chief Executive Martln Barkley Striving for excellence An Associated Teaching Trust MAY = 2019 given at day Xray,
patients not on these pathways will wait longer. Clinical teams can contact the radiology department when; due to a deterioration in the clinical condition of patient; a report becomes more urgent to have it expedited. The Regulation 28 report indicated an expected report turnaround of 5 but this is an incorrect figure for the CT examinations requested_ Both were requested as routine outpatient priority; to which we set a recommended reporting time of 10 days. Despite this it is acknowledged that; as in the case of Mr Howell; we do not meet this target for every patient: have attached at appendix 1.the guidance for reporting turnaround times for the different types of examinations. Reporting turnaround times are key performance indicator ` for the radiology department. As such are monitored internally by the radiology department, divisional management team and reported to the Trust Board As an organisation we strive to deliver the highest quality healthcare s0 this focus helps us t reduce the numbers of patients who wait longer the internal target for an examination report: Given the complexity of the workload and the challenges meeting the reporting turnaround we have risk management approach to the outstanding reporting: Unreported examinations wait within prioritised queue with : resource prioritised to the strategic objectives of the organisation focussing on acutelclinically urgent and cancer pathways. The routine outpatient work load waits longer t be reported: This clinical stratification of queue supports the risk management of any reporting backlogs The increasing focus on the need to ensure that the reporting turnaround times are not too long has gained traction nationally culminating in a recent CQC report undertaken into the situation. The recommendations of the report are that: NHS trust boards should ensure that:
1.1. have effective oversight of any backlog of radiology reports
1.2 risks to patients are fully assessed and managed
1.3. staffing and other resources are used effectively to ensure examinations are reported in an appropriate timeframe. 2 The National Imaging Optimisation Delivery Board should advise on national standards for report turnaround times; SO that trusts can monitor and benchmark their performance_ The Royal College of Radiologists and the Society and College of Radiographers should make sure that clear frameworks are developed to support trusts in managing turnaround times safely: Until any national standards are published by the National Imaging Optimisation Delivery Board or a clear framework Is published by the RCR or SOR the radiology department will continue to work to its current standards These will be reviewed in light of any national publications. httpslLwww cac org uklsites default/files/20180718-radiology-reporting-review-report-final-for-webpdf days they than the they
hope this provides clarity on the current situation with regards to radiology reporting tumaround at Mid Yorkshire Hospitals as well as the national context It also outlines our approach to managing performance and the risk If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
patients not on these pathways will wait longer. Clinical teams can contact the radiology department when; due to a deterioration in the clinical condition of patient; a report becomes more urgent to have it expedited. The Regulation 28 report indicated an expected report turnaround of 5 but this is an incorrect figure for the CT examinations requested_ Both were requested as routine outpatient priority; to which we set a recommended reporting time of 10 days. Despite this it is acknowledged that; as in the case of Mr Howell; we do not meet this target for every patient: have attached at appendix 1.the guidance for reporting turnaround times for the different types of examinations. Reporting turnaround times are key performance indicator ` for the radiology department. As such are monitored internally by the radiology department, divisional management team and reported to the Trust Board As an organisation we strive to deliver the highest quality healthcare s0 this focus helps us t reduce the numbers of patients who wait longer the internal target for an examination report: Given the complexity of the workload and the challenges meeting the reporting turnaround we have risk management approach to the outstanding reporting: Unreported examinations wait within prioritised queue with : resource prioritised to the strategic objectives of the organisation focussing on acutelclinically urgent and cancer pathways. The routine outpatient work load waits longer t be reported: This clinical stratification of queue supports the risk management of any reporting backlogs The increasing focus on the need to ensure that the reporting turnaround times are not too long has gained traction nationally culminating in a recent CQC report undertaken into the situation. The recommendations of the report are that: NHS trust boards should ensure that:
1.1. have effective oversight of any backlog of radiology reports
1.2 risks to patients are fully assessed and managed
1.3. staffing and other resources are used effectively to ensure examinations are reported in an appropriate timeframe. 2 The National Imaging Optimisation Delivery Board should advise on national standards for report turnaround times; SO that trusts can monitor and benchmark their performance_ The Royal College of Radiologists and the Society and College of Radiographers should make sure that clear frameworks are developed to support trusts in managing turnaround times safely: Until any national standards are published by the National Imaging Optimisation Delivery Board or a clear framework Is published by the RCR or SOR the radiology department will continue to work to its current standards These will be reviewed in light of any national publications. httpslLwww cac org uklsites default/files/20180718-radiology-reporting-review-report-final-for-webpdf days they than the they
hope this provides clarity on the current situation with regards to radiology reporting tumaround at Mid Yorkshire Hospitals as well as the national context It also outlines our approach to managing performance and the risk If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sent To
- Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
4 Aug 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 12th June 2018 an investigation was commenced into the death of Mr Alfred Howell (known as 'Alf) , aged 73. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 21st January 2019. conclusion of the Inquest was that Mr Howell's cause of death was by way of Disseminated lung adenocarcinoma The conclusion was that this was a natural cause of death_
Circumstances of the Death
On 30th May 2018 Mr Alfred Howell; (known as 'AlF) was admitted t0 Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield following respiratory investigation which indicated deterioration including the presence of now bilateral pleural effusions and the slight collapse of both lungs Although he was stable on a review, on 1st June 2018 his condition then deteriorated. further large collapse to the left lung was identified and although Mr Howell was treated accordingly he suffered a cardiac arrest and passed away on 5th June 2018, his death being confirmed at 0407 hours:
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation has the power to take such action:
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.