Kirsty Walker
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2018-0396
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 12 Jul 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Prolonged delays (months) in transferring prisoners requiring secure hospital care under the Mental Health Act, far exceeding recommended timeframes, are caused by a severe shortage of available beds.
View full coroner's concerns
The court heard evidence in relation to the process and timeframes for transferring prisoners under s.47 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to secure hospitals. In particular, the court heard from , a Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist and the Clinical Director of CNWL Offender Care as well as two other Consultant Forensic Psychiatrists acting as independent experts, and The court heard that where a prisoner is assessed as being detainable under the Mental Health Act 1983, they ought to be transferred to hospital within 14 days, pursuant to the recommendations in the 2009 Bradley Report. However, the court heard that the process for carrying out such transfers is in fact a long and convoluted process and that the 14-day timeframe envisaged in the Bradley Report is not complied with as a matter of practice. told the court that the average waiting time at HMP Bronzefield for transfer to a secure hospital bed is 2-3 months, and that this compares well as against the waiting times at other prisons. told the court that the average waiting time for transfer to a secure hospital bed in London was 10-12 months. told the court that in his opinion the lengthy waiting times were due primarily to a dearth of secure hospital beds across the country. The MATTER OF CONCERN is: I am concerned that the average time to transfer a prisoner to a secure hospital under s.47 of the Mental Health Act 1983 is well in excess of the 14 days envisaged by the 2009 Bradley Report and presents a risk of further deaths.
Responses
Action Planned
NHS England is undertaking demand and capacity reviews for adult secure services, aiming to optimise capacity and throughput, with results expected in 2019/20. They are also revising prison transfer and remission guidance, and expect this to make the transfer/remission process more efficient. (AI summary)
NHS England is undertaking demand and capacity reviews for adult secure services, aiming to optimise capacity and throughput, with results expected in 2019/20. They are also revising prison transfer and remission guidance, and expect this to make the transfer/remission process more efficient. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Crawford
Re: Report to Prevent Future Deaths (Regulation 28) concerning the death of Ms Kirsty Walker who died whilst under the care of HMP Bronzefield on 27 September 2015.
Thank you for your letter and Regulation 28 Report (“Report”) issued on Wednesday 19 December 2018 following the inquest into the death of Kirsty Walker. I would like to express my deep sympathy to Ms Walker’s family.
The report raised a concern regarding the average time to transfer a prisoner to a secure hospital under s. 47 of the Mental Health Act 1983 which is in excess of the 14 days envisaged by the 2009 Bradley Report.
The statutory context within which to consider the transfer of prisoners to a mental health facility is provided by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (HSCA 2012) and the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983).
Under the HSCA 2012, NHS England has responsibility for the commissioning of healthcare in prisons and the commissioning of adult secure mental health beds, amongst other specialist mental health services. More recently NHS England has devolved responsibility to secondary MH providers in respect of managing budgets and planning for their local populations. These New Care Models (NCMs) comprise of a lead provider arrangement or a collaborative of providers who are responsible for planning the pathway for their local populations in terms of adult medium and low secure services. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) are responsible for the commissioning of other mental health services, including psychiatric intensive care units (PICU).
Both adult secure mental health beds and PICU beds can be accessed for transferred prisoners who require detention under the MHA 1983 to mental health inpatient services. Such prisoners will be subject to the requirements and effects of sections 47 (and 48) of the MHA 1983.
Ms Anna Crawford Assistant Coroner for Surrey HM Coroner’s Court Station Approach Woking Surrey GU22 7AP
Professor Stephen Powis National Medical Director 6th Floor, Skipton House 80 London Road SE1 6LH
13th March 2019
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations The provisions of the MHA 1983 do not stipulate a timescale within which prisoner transfers from prison to mental health inpatient services must take place.
Lord Bradley, in his report published in April 2009 following an independent review of the experiences of people with mental health problems and people with learning disabilities within the criminal justice system called on the Department of Health to “develop a new minimum target for the NHS of 14 days to transfer a prisoner with acute, severe mental illness to an appropriate healthcare setting”, and that “this new target should be included as a mandated item in the Central Mental Health contract and included in the next edition of the Operating Framework” (Bradley 2009, p.106).
The Government did not accept these recommendations, but placed them ‘under review’ stating that:
“The Government agrees with the goal behind this recommendation and considers that the time to transfer those with acute severe mental ill health from prison should be reduced to a minimum. The Board will consider what further guidance should be issued to the NHS and criminal justice agencies along with improved commissioning of services to achieve this.”
In April 2011 the Department of Health published the Good Practice Procedure Guide: The transfer and remission of adult prisoners under s47 and s48 of the Mental Health Act1 (The Good Practice Guide). This Good Practice Guide sets out suggested time limits for assessments and transfers under section 47 and section 48 of the MHA 1983 with transfer to secure mental health hospital within 14 days of the initial request for assessment. Appendix 1 of the guide provides full details of suggested timeframes for each part of the assessment and transfer process.
NHS England has regard to the above Good Practice Guide in relation to transfer times from prison to mental health inpatient services and is now responsible for reviewing the Good Practice Guide. The aim of the review is to provide for more clinically informed timescales for the transfer and remission of prisoners to and from mental health hospital. This revised document has been developed with stakeholders and is currently being prepared in readiness for public consultation which is anticipated to take place early in 2019.
Until a new Good Practice Guide is published, the Good Practice Guidance 2011 is extant pending the completion of the revision process and publication. Those delivering the healthcare service specification within a prison (as well as those providing adult secure mental health and PICU services) will be expected to read their relevant service specification in conjunction with the prevailing Good Practice Guidance in relation to transfer and remission times.
The information below provides details of work being undertaken by NHS England to improve and enhance the pathway to and from prisons to mental health inpatient services.
1 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-transfer-and-remission-of-adult-prisoners-under- s47-and-s48-of-the-mental-health-act
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations NHS England is aware that there are instances where the transfer process takes longer than the suggested 14 days and are working with all stakeholders to better understand the issues. Part of this work is to determine how long is appropriate for the process to take from initial identification of the need for a referral to a mental health inpatient service to the point that someone is transferred. Within this timescale it is important to specify key elements of the process, one of these being the time taken from the decision that an inpatient bed is required to the transfer taking place. The suggestion in the recent Independent Review Report of the MHA (1983)2 describes two new, sequential, time limits of 14 days each (total 28 days):
i. from the point of initial referral to the first psychiatric assessment;
ii. from the first psychiatric assessment until the transfer takes place
It is also very important that, where it is evident that there is an urgent clinical need for treatment, that the whole process can be delivered to shortened timelines. This would be determined by the clinical presentation of an individual and the requirement for urgent treatment that could not be provided in the prison.
NHS England is undertaking a number of pieces of work, liaising and engaging with all stakeholders to better understand the issues that can cause delay and to explore how this can be alleviated. These include:
1. An annual audit benchmarking data in relation to the transfer and remission process;
2. Improved performance management through increased and improved collection and analysis of data;
3. A demand and capacity review in relation to adult high, medium and low-secure services;
4. An initiative was proposed in December 2015 and then piloted from 2016, where mental health care providers were encouraged to take on the management of tertiary budgets for adult medium and low secure services and were able to work in partnership with other providers to enable the local system to be responsive and take ownership of the whole pathway including where that related to prison transfers. In February 2018 it was agreed that this approach would be rolled out nationally;
5. The development of pilot sites for intensive community forensic models of care to enable earlier discharge with appropriate levels of support outside secure hospitals;
6. Revised service specifications for adult medium and low secure services, ongoing work to revise the high secure service specification.
All of the work described above will enable better throughput across the whole secure pathway, thus enabling the appropriate capacity to be available when it is required.
Further details of some of these initiatives are set out below.
As part of these work programmes a national annual audit now takes place to establish benchmarking data on the transfer and remission process for prisoners. This is in
2 https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/independent-review-of-the-mental-health-act
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations addition to local audits undertaken by NHS England regional commissioners. The last audit was published on 16th November 2018 and can be seen here:
static/Other/2018/Data%20Transfers%20and%20Remissions%20Census%20Report .pdf.
The next audit is currently underway, based on a census date of 28 February 2019. It is anticipated that the report will be available by the end of May 2019.
In respect to the improved performance management and capability that is being developed in this area, good practice examples relating to the pathway between prisons and respective mental health inpatient services are being identified in some parts of the country and processes to disseminate and share this information nationally is a specific focus.
Another example of good practice is the development of a prison transfer service within a secure inpatient service. This service focusses specifically on transfers from prison, enabling timely transfers and remission where appropriate to ensure that particular capacity is used exclusively for this patient group.
As above a review of the Good Practice Guidance 2011 has taken place, led by NHS England. The revised guidance will be submitted for public consultation prior to implementation nationally, and will consider the whole process of referral, assessment, transfer and remission.
In relation to adult medium and low secure services specifically, NHS England is conducting a demand and capacity review, ensuring that inpatient services are situated in the correct geographical location, delivering the right type of service in a timely way. These services must be integrated with local pathways and for some, these are community mental health services whilst for others prison services. The reconfiguration of beds sits alongside other ongoing work as described above. The effect of this will be to ensure existing capacity and throughput is optimised.
In relation to high secure services, a similar demand and capacity review is being undertaken as part of strategic commissioning work. This review is in its early stages and NHS England aims to publish the results during 2019/20.
The above initiatives are already leading to reductions in length of stay in adult secure services and better throughput, which enables the whole system to work more effectively by making better use of available capacity overall, and making the process of transfers from prison more timely and efficient. This is in line with the relevant policy direction in terms of the Five Year Forward View (published October 2014), and Building the Right Support for the Learning Difficulties and Autistic Spectrum Disorder population (published October 2015), as well as the recent ‘Long Term Plan’ (published 7 January 2019).
As it stands the Good Practice Guidance (2011) is extant pending the completion of the revision process and the publication of the new guidance. Those delivering the
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations healthcare service within a prison (as well as those providing adult secure mental health services) are expected to read the relevant service specification in conjunction with the prevailing Good Practice Guidance in relation to transfer and remission times. It has proven and is further anticipated that the above works and initiatives, alongside the implementation of the new more clinically based guidance, will make the transfer/remission process as a whole more efficient.
I hope the information above addresses the concerns you have raised within your Report and provides you with the assurances that you requested. If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Re: Report to Prevent Future Deaths (Regulation 28) concerning the death of Ms Kirsty Walker who died whilst under the care of HMP Bronzefield on 27 September 2015.
Thank you for your letter and Regulation 28 Report (“Report”) issued on Wednesday 19 December 2018 following the inquest into the death of Kirsty Walker. I would like to express my deep sympathy to Ms Walker’s family.
The report raised a concern regarding the average time to transfer a prisoner to a secure hospital under s. 47 of the Mental Health Act 1983 which is in excess of the 14 days envisaged by the 2009 Bradley Report.
The statutory context within which to consider the transfer of prisoners to a mental health facility is provided by the Health and Social Care Act 2012 (HSCA 2012) and the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983).
Under the HSCA 2012, NHS England has responsibility for the commissioning of healthcare in prisons and the commissioning of adult secure mental health beds, amongst other specialist mental health services. More recently NHS England has devolved responsibility to secondary MH providers in respect of managing budgets and planning for their local populations. These New Care Models (NCMs) comprise of a lead provider arrangement or a collaborative of providers who are responsible for planning the pathway for their local populations in terms of adult medium and low secure services. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) are responsible for the commissioning of other mental health services, including psychiatric intensive care units (PICU).
Both adult secure mental health beds and PICU beds can be accessed for transferred prisoners who require detention under the MHA 1983 to mental health inpatient services. Such prisoners will be subject to the requirements and effects of sections 47 (and 48) of the MHA 1983.
Ms Anna Crawford Assistant Coroner for Surrey HM Coroner’s Court Station Approach Woking Surrey GU22 7AP
Professor Stephen Powis National Medical Director 6th Floor, Skipton House 80 London Road SE1 6LH
13th March 2019
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations The provisions of the MHA 1983 do not stipulate a timescale within which prisoner transfers from prison to mental health inpatient services must take place.
Lord Bradley, in his report published in April 2009 following an independent review of the experiences of people with mental health problems and people with learning disabilities within the criminal justice system called on the Department of Health to “develop a new minimum target for the NHS of 14 days to transfer a prisoner with acute, severe mental illness to an appropriate healthcare setting”, and that “this new target should be included as a mandated item in the Central Mental Health contract and included in the next edition of the Operating Framework” (Bradley 2009, p.106).
The Government did not accept these recommendations, but placed them ‘under review’ stating that:
“The Government agrees with the goal behind this recommendation and considers that the time to transfer those with acute severe mental ill health from prison should be reduced to a minimum. The Board will consider what further guidance should be issued to the NHS and criminal justice agencies along with improved commissioning of services to achieve this.”
In April 2011 the Department of Health published the Good Practice Procedure Guide: The transfer and remission of adult prisoners under s47 and s48 of the Mental Health Act1 (The Good Practice Guide). This Good Practice Guide sets out suggested time limits for assessments and transfers under section 47 and section 48 of the MHA 1983 with transfer to secure mental health hospital within 14 days of the initial request for assessment. Appendix 1 of the guide provides full details of suggested timeframes for each part of the assessment and transfer process.
NHS England has regard to the above Good Practice Guide in relation to transfer times from prison to mental health inpatient services and is now responsible for reviewing the Good Practice Guide. The aim of the review is to provide for more clinically informed timescales for the transfer and remission of prisoners to and from mental health hospital. This revised document has been developed with stakeholders and is currently being prepared in readiness for public consultation which is anticipated to take place early in 2019.
Until a new Good Practice Guide is published, the Good Practice Guidance 2011 is extant pending the completion of the revision process and publication. Those delivering the healthcare service specification within a prison (as well as those providing adult secure mental health and PICU services) will be expected to read their relevant service specification in conjunction with the prevailing Good Practice Guidance in relation to transfer and remission times.
The information below provides details of work being undertaken by NHS England to improve and enhance the pathway to and from prisons to mental health inpatient services.
1 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-transfer-and-remission-of-adult-prisoners-under- s47-and-s48-of-the-mental-health-act
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations NHS England is aware that there are instances where the transfer process takes longer than the suggested 14 days and are working with all stakeholders to better understand the issues. Part of this work is to determine how long is appropriate for the process to take from initial identification of the need for a referral to a mental health inpatient service to the point that someone is transferred. Within this timescale it is important to specify key elements of the process, one of these being the time taken from the decision that an inpatient bed is required to the transfer taking place. The suggestion in the recent Independent Review Report of the MHA (1983)2 describes two new, sequential, time limits of 14 days each (total 28 days):
i. from the point of initial referral to the first psychiatric assessment;
ii. from the first psychiatric assessment until the transfer takes place
It is also very important that, where it is evident that there is an urgent clinical need for treatment, that the whole process can be delivered to shortened timelines. This would be determined by the clinical presentation of an individual and the requirement for urgent treatment that could not be provided in the prison.
NHS England is undertaking a number of pieces of work, liaising and engaging with all stakeholders to better understand the issues that can cause delay and to explore how this can be alleviated. These include:
1. An annual audit benchmarking data in relation to the transfer and remission process;
2. Improved performance management through increased and improved collection and analysis of data;
3. A demand and capacity review in relation to adult high, medium and low-secure services;
4. An initiative was proposed in December 2015 and then piloted from 2016, where mental health care providers were encouraged to take on the management of tertiary budgets for adult medium and low secure services and were able to work in partnership with other providers to enable the local system to be responsive and take ownership of the whole pathway including where that related to prison transfers. In February 2018 it was agreed that this approach would be rolled out nationally;
5. The development of pilot sites for intensive community forensic models of care to enable earlier discharge with appropriate levels of support outside secure hospitals;
6. Revised service specifications for adult medium and low secure services, ongoing work to revise the high secure service specification.
All of the work described above will enable better throughput across the whole secure pathway, thus enabling the appropriate capacity to be available when it is required.
Further details of some of these initiatives are set out below.
As part of these work programmes a national annual audit now takes place to establish benchmarking data on the transfer and remission process for prisoners. This is in
2 https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/independent-review-of-the-mental-health-act
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations addition to local audits undertaken by NHS England regional commissioners. The last audit was published on 16th November 2018 and can be seen here:
static/Other/2018/Data%20Transfers%20and%20Remissions%20Census%20Report .pdf.
The next audit is currently underway, based on a census date of 28 February 2019. It is anticipated that the report will be available by the end of May 2019.
In respect to the improved performance management and capability that is being developed in this area, good practice examples relating to the pathway between prisons and respective mental health inpatient services are being identified in some parts of the country and processes to disseminate and share this information nationally is a specific focus.
Another example of good practice is the development of a prison transfer service within a secure inpatient service. This service focusses specifically on transfers from prison, enabling timely transfers and remission where appropriate to ensure that particular capacity is used exclusively for this patient group.
As above a review of the Good Practice Guidance 2011 has taken place, led by NHS England. The revised guidance will be submitted for public consultation prior to implementation nationally, and will consider the whole process of referral, assessment, transfer and remission.
In relation to adult medium and low secure services specifically, NHS England is conducting a demand and capacity review, ensuring that inpatient services are situated in the correct geographical location, delivering the right type of service in a timely way. These services must be integrated with local pathways and for some, these are community mental health services whilst for others prison services. The reconfiguration of beds sits alongside other ongoing work as described above. The effect of this will be to ensure existing capacity and throughput is optimised.
In relation to high secure services, a similar demand and capacity review is being undertaken as part of strategic commissioning work. This review is in its early stages and NHS England aims to publish the results during 2019/20.
The above initiatives are already leading to reductions in length of stay in adult secure services and better throughput, which enables the whole system to work more effectively by making better use of available capacity overall, and making the process of transfers from prison more timely and efficient. This is in line with the relevant policy direction in terms of the Five Year Forward View (published October 2014), and Building the Right Support for the Learning Difficulties and Autistic Spectrum Disorder population (published October 2015), as well as the recent ‘Long Term Plan’ (published 7 January 2019).
As it stands the Good Practice Guidance (2011) is extant pending the completion of the revision process and the publication of the new guidance. Those delivering the
Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations healthcare service within a prison (as well as those providing adult secure mental health services) are expected to read the relevant service specification in conjunction with the prevailing Good Practice Guidance in relation to transfer and remission times. It has proven and is further anticipated that the above works and initiatives, alongside the implementation of the new more clinically based guidance, will make the transfer/remission process as a whole more efficient.
I hope the information above addresses the concerns you have raised within your Report and provides you with the assurances that you requested. If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Action Planned
NHS England is undertaking service reviews across all adult high, medium and low secure services and reviewing the current prison transfer and remission guidance. A new service specification for an integrated mental health service for prisons in England is being implemented. (AI summary)
NHS England is undertaking service reviews across all adult high, medium and low secure services and reviewing the current prison transfer and remission guidance. A new service specification for an integrated mental health service for prisons in England is being implemented. (AI summary)
View full response
From Jackie Doyle-Price MP Department Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Mental Health; Inequalities and Suicide Prevention of Health & Social Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H OEU 020 7210 4850 Our Ref: PFD-1161207 Miss Anna Crawford HM Assistant Coroner; Surrey HM Coroner's Court Station Approach Woking GU22 7AP 13 March 2019 JeCv (MW Grou_{ord Thank you for your correspondence of 20 December to Matt Hancock about the death of Miss Kirsty Walker: Iam responding as Minister with responsibility for mental health and prison health services and I am grateful for the additional time in which to do so. Ihave noted the concerns raised in report about the length of time it takes to transfer a prisoner to a secure hospital under section 47 of the Mental Health Act 1983! and the risk this poses to future deaths It is not clear from the detail in the report as to the extent that this was a contributing factor in the death of Miss Walker: However; I acknowledge the evidence given at inquest in relation to this and the cause for concern of future deaths. You issued report to NHS England as well as the Department NHS England is responsible for the commissioning of prison health care services and the commissioning of specialist mental health services, including secure adult mental health beds It is therefore for NHS England to respond to you in detail. However; I am aware of, and you will be assured by, the work currently undertaken by NHS England around improving access to mental health services, including secure inpatient care, for offenders with mental health difficulties. https: www legislation gov uklukpga/1983/20 contents your your hope being
In line with the Five Year Forward View for Mental Health? and the Strategic Direction for Health Services in the Justice System' , NHS England is working with partners to ensure that offenders receive the right care, in the right place, at the right time: It is carrying out service reviews across all adult high, medium and low secure services The review will include the service capacity required, taking into account a number of criteria such as levels of security, gender; service types and geographical location. NHS England is also reviewing the current prison transfer and remission guidance, published by the Department of Health and Social Care in 20114. In particular; the review is looking at whether the timescales within the guidance take into account clinical urgency and need: The revised guidance will be subject to full, public consultation in due course_ In addition; a new service specification for an integrated mental health service for prisons in Englands is implemented, its aim to provide clear; minimum service requirements that will deliver improved standards and outcomes, including on transfer times where appropriate. I hope this information is helpful and outlines the steps that are being taken to improve access to mental health services for offenders with mental health difficulties. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention: HOu& JACKIE DOYLE-PRICE httpsie WWW englandnhsuklw-conten uploads 201L6.02MMental-Health-Taskforce-EYEV_finalpdf https: Ww england nhs uklwp-content/uploads/2016 ]Ohlth-justice-directions-vl Lpdf https: ILwww gov uklgovemmentoublications the-transfer-and-remission-of-adult-prisoners-under-s4Z-and-s48-ofthe- mental-health-act https: Www england nhs uklpublication/service-specification-integrated-mental-health-service-for-prisons-in-england being
In line with the Five Year Forward View for Mental Health? and the Strategic Direction for Health Services in the Justice System' , NHS England is working with partners to ensure that offenders receive the right care, in the right place, at the right time: It is carrying out service reviews across all adult high, medium and low secure services The review will include the service capacity required, taking into account a number of criteria such as levels of security, gender; service types and geographical location. NHS England is also reviewing the current prison transfer and remission guidance, published by the Department of Health and Social Care in 20114. In particular; the review is looking at whether the timescales within the guidance take into account clinical urgency and need: The revised guidance will be subject to full, public consultation in due course_ In addition; a new service specification for an integrated mental health service for prisons in Englands is implemented, its aim to provide clear; minimum service requirements that will deliver improved standards and outcomes, including on transfer times where appropriate. I hope this information is helpful and outlines the steps that are being taken to improve access to mental health services for offenders with mental health difficulties. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention: HOu& JACKIE DOYLE-PRICE httpsie WWW englandnhsuklw-conten uploads 201L6.02MMental-Health-Taskforce-EYEV_finalpdf https: Ww england nhs uklwp-content/uploads/2016 ]Ohlth-justice-directions-vl Lpdf https: ILwww gov uklgovemmentoublications the-transfer-and-remission-of-adult-prisoners-under-s4Z-and-s48-ofthe- mental-health-act https: Www england nhs uklpublication/service-specification-integrated-mental-health-service-for-prisons-in-england being
Sent To
- Department of Health and Social Care
- NHS England
Response Status
Linked responses
2 of 2
56-Day Deadline
12 Jul 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
The inquest into the death of Miss Kirsty Walker was opened on 7 October 2015. It was resumed on 29 October 2018 with a jury. The jury returned their conclusion on 13 November 2018. They found the medical cause of death to have been: la. Hypoxic brain injury lb. Cardiorespiratory arrest lc. Ligature compression to the neck They concluded with a short-form conclusion of accidental death together with a narrative conclusion.
Circumstances of the Death
Miss Walker died at St Peters Hospital in Surrey on 27 September 2015. At the time of her death she was 26 years old and serving a prison sentence at HMP Bronzefield. HMP Bronzefield is a private prison run by Sodexo Justice Services, which contracts out secondary mental health services to Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL). Miss Walker had been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and had a history of self-harming, both in the community and during previous periods of imprisonment. She began her final period of imprisonment at HMP Bronzefield on 24 March 2015 and from 25 March 2015 onwards she was managed under the prison’s suicide and self-harm prevention procedures (ACCT procedures). During the period from 25 March until 25 September 2015 Miss Walker engaged in 235 acts of self-harm, with 215 of those acts involving the tying of ligatures around her neck. On 25 September 2015 she was found unresponsive in her cell with a ligature tied around her neck. She was taken by ambulance to St Peter’s Hospital but she did not recover and she died at the hospital on 27 September 2015.
Copies Sent To
2. Sodexo Justice Services
3. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
4. Cimmaron (Healthcare)
j 2o1 4
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
National guidance on SMART action points
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Share Clinical Assessor Advice
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Simplify External Regulation
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Safety Management Systems Coordination
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.