William Atherton
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2018-0400
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Failure of medical review, unrecognised worsening condition, missing nursing observations, and incorrect, inconsistently applied Early Warning Scores prevented proper escalation of patient care.
View full coroner's concerns
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. The MATTERS OF CONCERNS are as follows: That no medical review of Mr Atherton took place after the ward round on 30th. That his worsening condition was not recognised by the junior doctor reviewing the blood results. That no nursing observations were carried out in the several hours whilst he waited to go home and that potential warning signs of a bowel obstruction were not recognised and acted upon. His documentation was incorrectly filled in (early warning scores EWS) and thus the proper escalation of treatment which this should have triggered did not take place. That the different department at QEH appear to complete EWS differently results in inconsistent scoring and the potential to not escalate treatment of a patient who needs it.
Sent To
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
15 Feb 2019
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 28/03/2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of William Clifford ATHERTON aged 92. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 12/12/2018. The conclusion of the inquest was: Medical Cause of Death 1a Intestinal Obstruction 1b Intra‐Abdominal Adhesions including a Constricting Band 1c Previous repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Conclusion: A Narrative Conclusion (a copy of which is attached).
Conclusion: A Narrative Conclusion (a copy of which is attached).
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Atherton was admitted to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) on 29 May 2017 with abdominal pain and nausea, urinary retention and a distended abdomen. He was assessed in the ED and was thought to have a bowel obstruction. Investigation there showed a distended bladder and a plain x‐ray did not show any definite signs of a bowel obstruction. Blood tests demonstrated poor kidney function and a raised CRP.A catheter was inserted. On admission to the ward he was assessed by the surgical registrar who found him to be a poor historian and he was seen the next day by two Consultants, one general surgical, the other a Urologist. They believed he had urinary retention secondary to constipation and an enema was ordered. This worked well, and the plan was for blood tests and discharge. Bloods were taken and showed some improvement in renal function but were reviewed by a junior doctor. A third set of bloods were taken apparently in error and the results of these showed worsening renal function and a general deterioration in his condition. These too were seen by a junior doctor. No senior review of Mr Atherton took place after the morning ward round. He was left on the ward for several hours waiting for discharge and transport, no further observations were taken and no doctor reviewed him prior to actual discharge. He went home, his family reported that he had severely deteriorated and were generally alarmed at his condition.
It was decided the GP would see him the next day. In any event he became severely unwell on 31st with vomiting of faecal matter, a distended abdomen and severe pain. He was taken to QEH Emergency Department and died the same day of bowel obstruction.
It was decided the GP would see him the next day. In any event he became severely unwell on 31st with vomiting of faecal matter, a distended abdomen and severe pain. He was taken to QEH Emergency Department and died the same day of bowel obstruction.
Copies Sent To
I have also sent it to the Department of Health, HSIB and Healthwatch, Norfolk who may find it useful or of interest
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response
9 Dated: 21/12/2018
…………………………………………………………….. Yvonne BLAKE Area Coroner for Norfolk Norfolk Coroner Service Carrow House 301 King Street Norwich NR1 2TN
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.