Shaun Berryman
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2017-0424
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 24 Apr 2018
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A patient's clinical assessment was conducted in a waiting area without a physical examination, and no clinical record was made of the encounter.
View full coroner's concerns
_ In evidence it was established that Mr. Berryman was assessed by Wells Road Surgery on 28.4.17 in respect of a chest infection but The clinical assessment took place in the waiting area, not a consultation room; No examination of the chest was performed; No clinical record was made_
Responses
Action Taken
The surgery is ensuring all medically relevant conversations occur in the consulting room for appropriate examination and privacy. 'Walk-in' patients are now added to the on-call triage list as a visual reminder to write relevant information in patient records. (AI summary)
The surgery is ensuring all medically relevant conversations occur in the consulting room for appropriate examination and privacy. 'Walk-in' patients are now added to the on-call triage list as a visual reminder to write relevant information in patient records. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Dr Fox Re: Coroner's concerns post-inquest (27/11/17) Ref No: 01549/2017 am writing my response regarding your 'Matters Of Concern' from the Regulation 28 Report dated November 2017_ attached the report from the practice's Significant Event Analysis (SEA) that took place on Friday 8uh December 2017 and will be referring to this report in my responses below. shall endeavour to answer each of your concerns below: The clinical assessment took place in the waiting area, not in consultation room was aware Mr Berryman did not see us often regarding medical problems, SO was keen to see him personally. But in view of refusal of an urgent appointment and reluctance to saw him at his convenience in the waiting room. did not want him to leave the surgery without being seen by a doctor, especially before the start of a long Bank Holiday weekend. From the SEA meeting; it was noted that Mr Berryman had not requested to see the on-call doctor that and instead had written a letter requesting antibiotics Mrs Scally; the receptionist that afternoon, confirmed that Mr Berryman was in fact offered a formal appointment to see the on-call doctor; but he declined this appointment hoping to get antibiotics without seeing doctor formally. As mentioned in inquest statements Mr Berryman had a frustrating day on Friday 28th April 2017 as he had been back and forth between Lloyds Pharmacy and the surgery twice already because of errors with his Methadone prescription_ From the SEA meeting, the first prescription error was when the receptionist gave an unsigned Methadone script to Mr Fox; 27th have his stay, day
Berryman: The second-time round, the Methadone prescription issued had not taken into account the upcoming Bank Holiday Monday, so when he came the third time, the prescription issued had to be adjusted to include that, because all pharmacies are closed on Bank Holiday Mondays_ As mentioned in inquest statements, the on-call doctor reviews urgent patients via a telephone triage appointment system. By Spm in the afternoon; all urgent appointments would normally be filled, so if someone wishes to see doctor; they would need to speak to them via telephone triage and then the doctor would decide whether warrant being seen as an extra. We do not have the capacity as practice to see patients via open access or as 'Walk- In', that is why we encourage everyone to ring in the morning to speak to the on-call doctor and get booked into one of the urgent appointment slots that Mr Berryman did not call the surgery at all that requesting an urgent doctor appointment. If someone does walk in wishing to be seen, my policy is to advise reception to book them in at the end of my session_ after urgent 'book on day' patients have been seen: Clearly, if a patient is deemed to be in extremis then they would be seen as an emergency On a standard on-call we have six 'book on day' slots in the morning, six 'book on day' slots in afternoon and six 'book pm' slots in the afternoon. Our on-call system works like this: Practice open 8am and the receptionists start filling the morning book on the day slots_ Once all the morning book on day slots are filled, all further calls join telephone triage list for review by the on-call doctor: Patients are seen on an appointment basis, but we often receive ad-hoc calls from paramedics or district nurses_ As we are not Walk-In Centre or Urgent Care Centre, we do not encourage walk ins and actively encourage patients to call in if feel unwell; so they can be triaged by the on-call doctor If a patient walks in, the receptionist will ask them why have come in and use their non-clinical skills to observe how they are_ They will then either ring the on-call doctor or knock on their door Once the on-call doctor has seen all the morning book on day patients, they will go down the telephone triage list and either manage patients over the phone or arrange them to come in in the afternoon, using the book pm slots_ If all the book on day and book pm slots are used up, the doctor can choose fo bring the patient in as an extra, but this is done at the doctor's discretion. In the afternoon, once all the afternoon book on and book pm slots are filled, the doctor contacts patients by telephone triage: Occasionally a patient will require an urgent home visit and this must be done between seeing patients and telephone triage. my they day day: day they they day
As well as seeing patients and talking to patients, the on-call doctor may be asked by a nurse to review a patient they are managing, asked by district nurse to prescribe medications, will be asked to do emergency prescriptions, will be asked by NHS111 to see patient or asked by the hospital to review patient after discharge and issue drug or other emergency prescriptions for patients to collect: But in this case , saw Mr Berryman between booked urgent patients, rather than at the end of the 'book on day' appointment list because he was reluctant to wait 20-30 minutes From the SEA meeting, Mrs Scally confirmed that Mr Berryman refused formal appointment and she confirmed that she saw me speaking with him in the waiting room: If Mr Berryman had agreed to wait for formal consultation, then would have done an appropriate full physical respiratory examination and prescribed him medication based on his presentation: accept that seeing Mr Berryman in the waiting room was far from an ideal; but took the opportunity to see patient; who had not booked or requested doctor appointment; based on my clinical judgement of the situation 2 No examination of the chest was performed As mentioned above, the discussion with Mr Berryman was done at his convenience rather than mine based on my clinical judgement of the situation. The assessment in the waiting room was not a formal consultation. was able to consult with Mr Berryman informally between urgent booked patients, but the public nature of the waiting room prevented me from doing physical examination. During my brief discussion, was able to get a brief history and observe Mr Berryman's at rest: he described a recent onset of a productive irritating cough over the last few days: recall he mentioned coughing up coloured phlegm, that his breathing seemed a bit worse than normal and he was using his blue inhaler more than normal: he appeared to be coughing intermittently; that suggested he had respiratory airways irritation possibly due to an infection; assessing his speech: Mr Berryman was able to speak to me in full sentences_ A person can be deemed to have acute severe asthma if have the 'inability to complete sentences in one breath' according to BTS asthma guidelines; assess his respiration and respiratory rate Whilst do not recall the exact figure for his respiratory rate, do recall that Mr Berryman was not breathing rapidly at rest and did not appear to be in respiratory distress, meaning he did not appear severely short of breath, did not have rapid shallow breathing, was not tired, drowsy or confused and did not feel faint: they
If when spoke to Mr Berryman he exhibited features suggestive of acute asthma: fast-respiratory rate and the inability to complete sentences in one breath, then would have insisted that he stay for a formal consultation and assessment. If at the time of my discussion, was concerned about Mr Berryman's acute physical health, would have not hesitated to insist that he stay for a formal examination and would have arranged acute admission to the local hospital for specialist treatment if clinically necessary: realise that seeing Mr Berryman at his convenience in the waiting room was not ideal and seeing him there prevented me from doing a formal consultation and full respiratory examination_ But he did not present with features of acute severe asthma (as described above) or a severe chest infection (confusion and fast respiratory rate), used my clinical judgement and felt that treatment at home with oral antibiotics (Amoxicillin) was appropriate in this situation, but with the follow up advice (which give to all patients who leave with oral antibiotics) , which is: if the patient feels are deteriorating in their health, should call (NHS) 111 or if he feels he is having difficulty breathing, then he or a relative should call 999 for emergency admission to hospital
3. No clinical record was made As the SEA meeting mentions, Mr Berryman had not requested to see the on- call doctor that day and instead had requested antibiotics via_ a letter Mrs Scally made me aware of Mr Berryman's presence in the waiting room by knocking on my consulting room door At that time was with a patient booked into an urgent 'book on day' appointment: advised Mrs Scally to ask Mr Berryman to wait till had seen all the booked urgent appointments that afternoon, which would have been 20_30 minutes_ This request would normally result in the patient being added to the triage list;, but when Mrs Scally spoke with Mr Berryman regarding my advice, she came back to me and said he had refused to wait to be seen as he need to off to the pharmacy. If he had accepted to stay, he would have been booked on the triage list as an extra patient: But since he refused an appointment; his details were not added to the triage list After Mr Berryman left; had proceeded to see the urgent 'book on day' patients that were due to be seen and then had to speak with over half- dozen patients by telephone triage before the ended at 6.30pm_ Without the visual reminder of Mr Berryman'$ name on the triage list, unfortunately forgot to write up my discussion into his records do not believe my failure to write in his records is a general sign of poor organisational skills, rather the lack of a visual reminder on the triage list meant my usual back-up of reviewing the triage list at the end of the on-call shift did not work on this occasion: This is because Mr Berryman was effectively a walk-in patient that did not want to have a formal consultation: Given that we do not provide walk-in service, our system was not set-up to address this risk they they get day
Upon reflection of this case_ accept that there are several issues that need to rectify to prevent any future harm to any other patient see now and in the future_ Primarily the main issue was me seeing patient in the waiting room and subsequently not being able to examine them properly_ realise that this situation must not happen Presently, have made sure that all medically relevant conversation with a patient occur in my consulting room, so appropriate physical examination can be done in privacy: Secondly regarding writing in his clinical records;any 'walk-in' patients are now added to the on-call triage list by reception staff in anticipation of potential assessment by the doctor; whilst the receptionist speaks to the on- call doctor to find out what their advice is. By adding their details to the on-call triage list, there is visual reminder for both the doctor and receptionist to write any relevant information into the patient records; want to re-iterate that my failure to write in Mr Berryman's records was not a general sign of poor organisational skills, rather the lack of a visual reminder on the on-call triage list meant my usual back-up review at the end of the on-call shift did not work on this occasion_ hope this statement covers the 'Matter Of Concern' arising from the Regulation 28 Report and if you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above address_
Berryman: The second-time round, the Methadone prescription issued had not taken into account the upcoming Bank Holiday Monday, so when he came the third time, the prescription issued had to be adjusted to include that, because all pharmacies are closed on Bank Holiday Mondays_ As mentioned in inquest statements, the on-call doctor reviews urgent patients via a telephone triage appointment system. By Spm in the afternoon; all urgent appointments would normally be filled, so if someone wishes to see doctor; they would need to speak to them via telephone triage and then the doctor would decide whether warrant being seen as an extra. We do not have the capacity as practice to see patients via open access or as 'Walk- In', that is why we encourage everyone to ring in the morning to speak to the on-call doctor and get booked into one of the urgent appointment slots that Mr Berryman did not call the surgery at all that requesting an urgent doctor appointment. If someone does walk in wishing to be seen, my policy is to advise reception to book them in at the end of my session_ after urgent 'book on day' patients have been seen: Clearly, if a patient is deemed to be in extremis then they would be seen as an emergency On a standard on-call we have six 'book on day' slots in the morning, six 'book on day' slots in afternoon and six 'book pm' slots in the afternoon. Our on-call system works like this: Practice open 8am and the receptionists start filling the morning book on the day slots_ Once all the morning book on day slots are filled, all further calls join telephone triage list for review by the on-call doctor: Patients are seen on an appointment basis, but we often receive ad-hoc calls from paramedics or district nurses_ As we are not Walk-In Centre or Urgent Care Centre, we do not encourage walk ins and actively encourage patients to call in if feel unwell; so they can be triaged by the on-call doctor If a patient walks in, the receptionist will ask them why have come in and use their non-clinical skills to observe how they are_ They will then either ring the on-call doctor or knock on their door Once the on-call doctor has seen all the morning book on day patients, they will go down the telephone triage list and either manage patients over the phone or arrange them to come in in the afternoon, using the book pm slots_ If all the book on day and book pm slots are used up, the doctor can choose fo bring the patient in as an extra, but this is done at the doctor's discretion. In the afternoon, once all the afternoon book on and book pm slots are filled, the doctor contacts patients by telephone triage: Occasionally a patient will require an urgent home visit and this must be done between seeing patients and telephone triage. my they day day: day they they day
As well as seeing patients and talking to patients, the on-call doctor may be asked by a nurse to review a patient they are managing, asked by district nurse to prescribe medications, will be asked to do emergency prescriptions, will be asked by NHS111 to see patient or asked by the hospital to review patient after discharge and issue drug or other emergency prescriptions for patients to collect: But in this case , saw Mr Berryman between booked urgent patients, rather than at the end of the 'book on day' appointment list because he was reluctant to wait 20-30 minutes From the SEA meeting, Mrs Scally confirmed that Mr Berryman refused formal appointment and she confirmed that she saw me speaking with him in the waiting room: If Mr Berryman had agreed to wait for formal consultation, then would have done an appropriate full physical respiratory examination and prescribed him medication based on his presentation: accept that seeing Mr Berryman in the waiting room was far from an ideal; but took the opportunity to see patient; who had not booked or requested doctor appointment; based on my clinical judgement of the situation 2 No examination of the chest was performed As mentioned above, the discussion with Mr Berryman was done at his convenience rather than mine based on my clinical judgement of the situation. The assessment in the waiting room was not a formal consultation. was able to consult with Mr Berryman informally between urgent booked patients, but the public nature of the waiting room prevented me from doing physical examination. During my brief discussion, was able to get a brief history and observe Mr Berryman's at rest: he described a recent onset of a productive irritating cough over the last few days: recall he mentioned coughing up coloured phlegm, that his breathing seemed a bit worse than normal and he was using his blue inhaler more than normal: he appeared to be coughing intermittently; that suggested he had respiratory airways irritation possibly due to an infection; assessing his speech: Mr Berryman was able to speak to me in full sentences_ A person can be deemed to have acute severe asthma if have the 'inability to complete sentences in one breath' according to BTS asthma guidelines; assess his respiration and respiratory rate Whilst do not recall the exact figure for his respiratory rate, do recall that Mr Berryman was not breathing rapidly at rest and did not appear to be in respiratory distress, meaning he did not appear severely short of breath, did not have rapid shallow breathing, was not tired, drowsy or confused and did not feel faint: they
If when spoke to Mr Berryman he exhibited features suggestive of acute asthma: fast-respiratory rate and the inability to complete sentences in one breath, then would have insisted that he stay for a formal consultation and assessment. If at the time of my discussion, was concerned about Mr Berryman's acute physical health, would have not hesitated to insist that he stay for a formal examination and would have arranged acute admission to the local hospital for specialist treatment if clinically necessary: realise that seeing Mr Berryman at his convenience in the waiting room was not ideal and seeing him there prevented me from doing a formal consultation and full respiratory examination_ But he did not present with features of acute severe asthma (as described above) or a severe chest infection (confusion and fast respiratory rate), used my clinical judgement and felt that treatment at home with oral antibiotics (Amoxicillin) was appropriate in this situation, but with the follow up advice (which give to all patients who leave with oral antibiotics) , which is: if the patient feels are deteriorating in their health, should call (NHS) 111 or if he feels he is having difficulty breathing, then he or a relative should call 999 for emergency admission to hospital
3. No clinical record was made As the SEA meeting mentions, Mr Berryman had not requested to see the on- call doctor that day and instead had requested antibiotics via_ a letter Mrs Scally made me aware of Mr Berryman's presence in the waiting room by knocking on my consulting room door At that time was with a patient booked into an urgent 'book on day' appointment: advised Mrs Scally to ask Mr Berryman to wait till had seen all the booked urgent appointments that afternoon, which would have been 20_30 minutes_ This request would normally result in the patient being added to the triage list;, but when Mrs Scally spoke with Mr Berryman regarding my advice, she came back to me and said he had refused to wait to be seen as he need to off to the pharmacy. If he had accepted to stay, he would have been booked on the triage list as an extra patient: But since he refused an appointment; his details were not added to the triage list After Mr Berryman left; had proceeded to see the urgent 'book on day' patients that were due to be seen and then had to speak with over half- dozen patients by telephone triage before the ended at 6.30pm_ Without the visual reminder of Mr Berryman'$ name on the triage list, unfortunately forgot to write up my discussion into his records do not believe my failure to write in his records is a general sign of poor organisational skills, rather the lack of a visual reminder on the triage list meant my usual back-up of reviewing the triage list at the end of the on-call shift did not work on this occasion: This is because Mr Berryman was effectively a walk-in patient that did not want to have a formal consultation: Given that we do not provide walk-in service, our system was not set-up to address this risk they they get day
Upon reflection of this case_ accept that there are several issues that need to rectify to prevent any future harm to any other patient see now and in the future_ Primarily the main issue was me seeing patient in the waiting room and subsequently not being able to examine them properly_ realise that this situation must not happen Presently, have made sure that all medically relevant conversation with a patient occur in my consulting room, so appropriate physical examination can be done in privacy: Secondly regarding writing in his clinical records;any 'walk-in' patients are now added to the on-call triage list by reception staff in anticipation of potential assessment by the doctor; whilst the receptionist speaks to the on- call doctor to find out what their advice is. By adding their details to the on-call triage list, there is visual reminder for both the doctor and receptionist to write any relevant information into the patient records; want to re-iterate that my failure to write in Mr Berryman's records was not a general sign of poor organisational skills, rather the lack of a visual reminder on the on-call triage list meant my usual back-up review at the end of the on-call shift did not work on this occasion_ hope this statement covers the 'Matter Of Concern' arising from the Regulation 28 Report and if you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above address_
Sent To
- Wells Road Surgery
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
24 Apr 2018
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On Mat 2017 and investigation was commenced into the death of Shaun Mark_ BERRYMAN, Aged 37 _ The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27th November 2017 The medical cause of death was Ia Morphine toxicity II Acute bronchopneumonia The conclusion of the inquest was Drug-related,
Circumstances of the Death
Mr. Berryman was found dead at his home address
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you] have the power to take such action:
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Transfusion Committees and Tranexamic Acid - England
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inadequate Pre-Operative Risk Assessment
Tranexamic Acid - Scotland, Wales and NI
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inadequate Pre-Operative Risk Assessment
Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Detainee Capture and Condition Records
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.