Harold Wonfor

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2017-0408
Date of Report 20 November 2017
Coroner Kate Thomas
Response Deadline ✓ from report 16 January 2018
All 1 response received · Deadline: 16 Jan 2018
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Multiple deaths occurred on a ward due to inadequate, incomplete, and unenforced falls risk assessments. Policies for vulnerable patients and the monitoring of falls prevention procedures were insufficient.
View full coroner's concerns
[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) Between January 2017 and April 2017 five deaths occurred on Cambridge Wards at William Harvey Hospital. Common to each was the fact that the death was caused as a result of a fall on the ward in circumstances where falls risk assessments were either inadequate, incomplete, not reviewed or not enforced. Inquests in respect of each the deaths have been held, the last in November 2017. The Trust was given an opportunity following the earlier inquests to provide evidence of changes to practice following the deaths. It is recognised that at the time of hearing the inquests much work has already been done to address these issues but that work is ongoing and parts of that work have not yet been implemented/were in the process of being implemented. It is for this reason that Regulation 28 reports arise from three of the deaths.

(2) That the policies and procedures for falls risk assessment is inadequate especially for the vulnerable (3) There is inadequate monitoring and enforcement of the falls prevention policies and procedures in place
Responses
Response East Kent NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
12 Jan 2018
Action Taken
The Trust monitors patient falls monthly as part of its quality indicators and has introduced SafeCare to enable ward staff to see if their staffing levels match demand; a full time band 4 Associate Practitioner for Falls Prevention joined the team in September 2017. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Thomas Re _ Mr Harold Graham Wonfor (deceased) Following the conclusion of the Inquest hearing into the death of Mr Harold Graham Wonfor on 14 September 2017 and your subsequent letter dated 20 November 2017 purauant t0 paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, write to inform you of the actions and considerations taken by East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust We note this Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths Is one of three Inqueets heard by the Central and South East Coroners in September 2017 and the matters of concern relate to the management of falls within the Trust Acknowledgment by the Sonior Coroner of the improvements that have already been made by the Trust regarding timely and adequate falls risk assessments is gratefully received and this work continues a8 outlined in my response. The rate of patient falls and patient falls resulting in harm to patients are key patient safety measures which the Trust monitors monthly as part of our quality indicators. also fom part of the core patient safety component of the Board priorities for 2017/18, Reports are received monthly to the Board of Directors and the Quality Committee on our performance against plan: We have set ourselves challenging stretch targets to achieve a8 our patient falls prevention programme is of a high priority. The latest confired results for October 2017 show the falls rate is
5.83 per 1,000 occupied bed which is below our target for the The confimed falls national rate from the 2015 National Falls Audit was 6.6 per 1,000 occupied bed the Trust overall had a confirmed falls rate of 6.29 at the time of publication This shows the falls rate for the Trust overall is better than the national rate. We They days, year: days;

The National Falls Audit also reports a patient harm rate i.e. where the harm to the patient; a8 a direct consequence of the fall is severe or death as with the patients concerned: The national rate in the 2015 report was 0.18 per 1000 occupied bed this was the rate for the Trust overall in this part of the National Falls Audit This shows the rate of harm to be the same a8 the national rate. The results of 2015 National Falls Audit showed that the Trust had Improvements to make in all three of our bed-holding hospitals; this improvement programme has again been a priority for the Trust: There are no published studies of falls risk prediction tools that predicted risk at greater than 70% sensitivity: The National Institute Health and Care Excellence (NICE) therefore concluded that all inpatients aged 65 and older 'should have their care managed a8 if are at risk of falling' on the basis that these patients 'often have newly acquired risk factors (euch a8 acute illness, delirium, cardiovascular disease , impaired mobility , medication or syncope syndrome) and are exposed to unfamiliar surroundings, which them at increased risk of during their inpatient stay' . The current falls policy and risk assessment tool reflect NICE guidance and we have focused on these areas specifically in order to action the factors that are known to reduce falls risk: We therefore reviewed our Falls Risk Assessment and Care Plan (FRACP) to be explicit about how incorporate this guidance. We also developed a quality improvement programme call "Fallstop" which to prevent patients falls in our care. Round 2 of the National Falls Audit took place in May 2017 , after the three falls in question had occurred; the audit results were published on 22 November 2017 , two days after the Trust received the three Regulation 28 reports Table demonstrates current perforance and the improvements seen across the three hospitals: Table 1 _ Comparative data from the 2015 and the 2017 Natlonal Falle Audlt Site Delirium Continence BP % Modlcatlon Vision % Call bell Mobility % CP % % % aid % 2017 K8CH 100 100 24 95 88 78 92 QEQMH 100 93 40 100 100 95 86 WHH 92 93 38 94 92 93 100 2015 KECH 60
65.2
88.2
91.7
66.7
84.6 92 QEQMH 65 50
66.7 88
70.6
76.9
88.5 WHH
37.9
45.5
45.8
36.4
18.2
55.6 The patient falls all occurred on the frailty Ward at the William Harvey Hospital; this ward often has confused, wandering patients and this situation requires additional 'eyes and ears' to help provide safe environment for the patients. It is a challenge to ensure that there are always sufficient staff on duty each shift to meet the ideal staff to patient ratio. Additional NHS Professionals Health Care Assistants and Registered Nurses that are requested are sometimes unfilled Where this situation occurs, staff are redeployed from other clinical areas_ We have in the past three month introduced SafeCare across the Trust: SafeCare enables ward staff see if their staffing levels match the demand and for staff to be moved across the site during each day: The nurse-in charge conducts We a days; the thoy falling puts

a census three times per day of the number and acuity of the patients and inputs this onto the system. SafeCare then calculates the number of nursing hours that are required during this census period and compares it to the number of nursing hours available. This allows for tha Clinical Site Team t0 make infomed decisions when the staff to the area of greatest risk and allows for the efficient use of all available nursing time_ In June; 2017 a business case was approved to support a full time band 4 Associate Practitioner (AP) for Falls Prevention and she joined the team in September 2017 . She is actively supporting the Fallstop programme_ would like to take this opportunity of thanking you for your letter and can reassure you that we have taken on board your comments and will continue our commitment to deliver a safe and effective service to our patiente.
Sent To
  • East Kent Hospitals University NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 16 Jan 2018
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 12/06/2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Harold Graham WONFOR. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 14th September 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was Harold Wonfor was admitted to the William Harvey Hospital on the 22nd of January 2017 with a history of falls which was not recognised. On the 24th of January he had an unwitnessed fall on Cambridge L ward sustaining a Subdural Haematoma from which he declined and subsequently died on the 30th January 2017. 1a Acute Subdural Haematoma b c

II Asbestosis
Circumstances of the Death
Following his admission to the Kent and Canterbury Hospital on the 21st of December 2016, Harold Wonfor sustained a number of falls whilst on the ward. Clinical investigation concluded that there had been no subsequent injury although it was well documented that he was frail, HAD a number of co-morbities and presented a falls risk. He was discharged on the 5th January 2017 into the care of his family. On the 22nd of January he was admitted in the William Harvey Hospital where be presented as being confused with reduced mobility. He was transferred to the CDU (Clinical Decisions Unit) for assessment. Hospital policy dictated that a falls assessment should be done within 6 hours of admission but such time should be abridged where the patient is vulnerable or a clear falls risk. Mr Wonfor was not assessed during the 24 hours he remained in the CDU in contravention of Hospital Policy. On the 24th of January he was transferred to Cambridge L Ward. At the time of transfer no falls assessment had been done and there were no falls prevention measures in place. At the very least Mr Wonfor should have been met by a Nurse upon arriving on the Ward and placed in an observation bed. This did not happen. Approximately 30 minutes after arriving on Cambridge L Ward, Mr Wonfor had an un-witnessed fall during which he struck his head on a sink and sustained a Subdural Haemotoma from which he subsequently declined and died on the 30th of January 2017.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Flawed mortality reviews
Implement medical examiner system
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Flawed mortality reviews
Extend medical examiners to stillbirths
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Flawed mortality reviews
Pressure damage risk assessment
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Falls prevention plans
Service change continuity plans
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Transparency use and sharing of information
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Flawed mortality reviews
Continuing responsibility for care
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Follow up of patients
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Independent medical examiners
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Flawed mortality reviews
Independent medical examiners
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Flawed mortality reviews

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.