Robert Dymond

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2017-0333
Date of Report 25 July 2017
Coroner Emma Whitting
Coroner Area Coventry
Response Deadline ✓ from report 19 September 2017
All 1 response received · Deadline: 19 Sep 2017
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Hospital DVT protocol did not align with NICE guidelines, and critical DVT history was not communicated to surgical teams, leading to a lack of awareness during subsequent assessments.
View full coroner's concerns
The_MATTERS QF CONCERN are as follows Deep Care the

(1) Following referral to the UHCW DVT Clinic by his GP on 22 November 2016 with suspected DVT_ Mr Dymond, having a Wells score of 2, was assessed as being 'likely' to be suffering from a DVT the investigations included a D-Dimer blood result of 0.97 and he was discharged home with instructions to self-administer therapeutic LMWH (Clezane) doses at home twice daily in his stomach pending an ultrasound scan booked for 25 November 2016. The scan performed on 25 November 2016 apparently revealed no evidence of a DVT and he was discharged back to the care of his GP_ Although the clinical management appeared to conform with the UHCW protocol in place at the time, this protocol did not appear to conform with NICE Guideline 144 (specifically section 1.1.3) which (since 2012) advises a repeat proximal leg vein Ultrasound scan 6-8 days Iater for all patients with a positive D-dimer test and & negative proximal leg ultrasound scan); (2) Neither the Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon nor the Anaesthetist performing the operation on 9 March 2017 had been made aware of the DVT investigationsltreatment in November 2016; (3) DVT investigationsltreatment in November 2016 did not appear to feature in the second pre-operative assessment carried out on 12 January 2017
Responses
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
18 Sep 2017
Disputed
The Trust believes its current pathway for managing DVTs goes beyond minimum requirements and therefore they do not repeat proximal scans. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mrs Whitting Re: Robert Dymond write in response to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths issued on July 2017_ The Trust's Haematology Department devise and manage the Trust's pathway for the management of the DVTs and would have been pleased to have been given the opportunity of providing you with evidence on this matter at the Inquest. In order to address your concerns their advice has been obtained. As you have stated the NICE guidance refers to the commission of proximal scans, which are taken at the knee level and show the veins at that point. When a proximal scan is undertaken they advise that repeat scan should be undertaken 6-8 days later when there is positive D Dimer and negative proximal scan_ The reason that this practice is not adopted by the Trust is because at UHCW, we undertake a more extended scan as routine which shows the leg veins below the knee to the trifurcation in the calf. This is discussed in NICE guideline 144 section 4.1 which states that whole leg scans do not routinely need a repeat scan: Therefore we believe that the Trust's pathway goes beyond the minimum requirements and accordingly we experience very low numbers of venous thromboembolism following discharge from the DVT service: Further; the Trust's standard practice in patients with a high risk Wells score and raised D-Dimers is to contact the patient 5-7 days later and arrange a repeat scan if the symptoms are not settling: Only small proportion of patients who present with isolated distal DVTs extend to the proximal veins Those that do not extend, rarely lead to clinically significant emboli as recognised by the British Society of Haematology national guidelines, a copy of which is attached by way of information. Chief Executive Officer: Andrew Hardy Chairman: Andrew Meehan 25th

The NICE rationale for repeating a scan is to detect those distal clots which have extended into the proximal veins as in this situation the symptoms will not resolve and would be anticipated to worsen. Therefore, for that reason patients whose symptoms are resolving are not recommended to have a repeat scan: It is also of note that the Trust use high sensitivity D Dimer kit and the British Society of Haematologists guidance states that patients with a moderate risk Wells score (1-2) can follow the of low probability if such a test is used: The haematologists do consider it unlikely that the patient did have proximal DVT as he was untreated and does not appear to have had any further problems up until his surgery 4 months later. As no DVT was identified by the investigations it would not have been relevant to pre-operative assessment and would not have been relevant to the operating team_ We hope this gives assurance that appropriate actions are in place for the management of DVT's Yours sincefely Professor Andrew Hardy Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer: Andrew Hardy Chairman: Andrew Meehan leg very path the
Sent To
  • Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 19 Sep 2017
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 23 March 2017, commenced an investigation into the death of Mr Robert Dymond, aged 61. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 July 2017. The medical cause of death was found to be: Ia Pulmonary Thromboembolism due to 1b Vein Thrombosis Ic Obesity and Recent Surgery for Knee Replacement The Conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative Conclusion: Died from a recognised complication of surgery:
Circumstances of the Death
On 20 May 2015, Mr Dymond has been placed on the waiting list for elective left knee replacement surgery: As he was considered to be high risk patient owing to his previous medical history, which included high BMI of 42.1, he had to undergo this at UHCW which has a Critical Unit: He had an initial pre-op assessment on 21 July 2016 and a further pre-op assessment on 12 January 2017. Despite the fact that he had undergone investigation and preliminary treatment for a suspected DVT in November 2016 at UHCW, was informed that the pre-op assessment in January 2017 had noted no changes since the previous one The Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon performing the surgery was not informed of the events in November 2016_ The surgery was performed on 9 March 2017 On the morning of 10 March 2017, and despite appropriate post-operative VTE prophylaxis, he suffered massive thromboembolic event and passed away on 11 March 2017 .
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Independent Statutory Resilience Body
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Improved Risk Assessment Approach
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Triennial Pandemic Exercises
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Publish Exercise Reports and Lessons
COVID-19 Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Apply best offer principle equally in GLOS
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Set deadline for HSS claims with guidance on late applications
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.