Abigail Baynham

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2017-0104
Date of Report 3 April 2017
Coroner Zafar Siddique
Coroner Area Black Country
Response Deadline ✓ from report 29 May 2017
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The report notes that when Ms Baynham left hospital, there was no referral made back to the Mental Health Liaison Service which may have triggered a further assessment.
View full coroner's concerns
1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that the when Ms Baynham had left hospital on the 22 November 2017, there was no further referral made back to Mental Health Liaison Service. This may have triggered a further assessment about her mental state and risk of self-harm.
Sent To
  • Black Country NHS
  • New Cross Hospital
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 2
56-Day Deadline 29 May 2017
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 5 December 2016, I commenced an investigation into the death of the late Ms Abigail Baynham. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 February 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was a short narrative conclusion of suicide.

The cause of death was:

1a Hanging
Circumstances of the Death
i) Ms Baynham had been known to Mental Health Services since 2010 with suicidal ideation precipitated by varying factors including illicit drug use, alcohol use, post-natal depression, relationship difficulties and social circumstances. ii) She had been referred by her GP to Healthy Minds in September 2016. The patient did not attend two appointments with Healthy Minds, had not responded to further contact attempts and was therefore discharged back to the care of her GP. iii) She was admitted to New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton on 20th November 2016 following an overdose of paracetamol, Ibuprofen and fluoxetine. Following the overdose, the patient was assessed by a Senior Nurse Practitioner within the Mental Health Liaison Service (MHLS) on 22nd November 2016. Although initially reluctant to engage she did cooperate with the assessment which did not, at the time, identify delusional thinking, paranoid ideation, perceptual disturbances or psychosis. This, together with the patient having capacity to make decisions regarding her care meant she was not detainable under the Mental Health Act. iv) At the time, she was offered appropriate services that correlated with the outcome of the assessment. The patient declined further support from Mental Health services although the patient was made aware that she could

[IL1: PROTECT] change her mind if she wishes to access support in the future and was given the number for Penn Hospital. v) Later in the afternoon she left the hospital taking her belongings and stated she no longer wishes to be there. The Police and family were notified and later that day she returned home with her family. vi) Sadly, on the 29 November 2017 she was found deceased at her flat and had taken her own life.
Action Should Be Taken
1. You may wish to consider setting up a protocol for referral to Mental Health Liaison Service in this situation when a patient absconds from hospital.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Community mental health services for violence-fixated children
Southport Inquiry
Mental health access for alcohol addiction
Mental health assessment powers for isolated children
Southport Inquiry
Mental health access for alcohol addiction
Independent review of use of force on mentally ill detainees
Brook House Inquiry
Mental health access for alcohol addiction
Service change continuity plans
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Continuing responsibility for care
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Follow up of patients
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.