Raymond Pollard

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2017-0023
Date of Report 25 January 2017
Coroner Veronica Hamilton-Deeley
Coroner Area Brighton and Hove
Response Deadline est. 16 April 2017
All 1 response received · Deadline: 16 Apr 2017
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A poorly informed decision to discharge a patient with no improvement, without doctor review, led to a failed discharge that seriously compromised the patient's health.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) A poorly informed decision to discharge made for a patient with no real Improvement in his condition_ (2) The patient was not seen again by a doctor or reviewed as to suitability for discharge.

(3) As a result the discharge failed and this failure seriously compromised Mr Pollard.
Responses
Brighton and West Sussex University Hospital NHSTrust NHS / Health Body
12 Apr 2017
Action Planned
The Trust's Head of Nursing reviewed the concerns and will share the learning with staff in Respiratory Medicine through sessions focusing on discharge procedures, responding to changes in patient NEWS scores, and appropriate documentation. Mr Pollard's care will be explored again at the next Respiratory Morbidity and Mortality Meeting and raised at the Trust-wide Deteriorating Patient Steering Group meeting. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Miss Hamilton-Deeley The_late_Mr Raymond Frank Pollard_QoB: 27/6/1931 NHSNo: 468 098.6298 Thank you for your letter of 26 January 2017 and for drawing your concerns tol attention was Interim Chief Executive and has now left the Trust) am very sorry to read about the circumstances of Mr Pollard's death and the concerns which you have highlighted: These issues have been reviewed by senior medical and nursing staff, including the Trust's Head of Nursing, Discharge and Partnerships, to identify improvements required within the Directorate and to ensure that learning from this case is shared with staff in Respiratory Medicine. You asked us in particular to give consideration to ensuring a medical review prior to discharge in complex patients with fluctuating clinical signs where the patient has not been discharged within 18-24 hours of the discharge decision, It is a principle of our discharge policy that once the decision has been made that the patient is medically ready for discharge (MRFD), the patient's discharge is then led by nursing staff. It is the responsibility of nursing staff to monitor the patient's condition and alert the medical staff if there are any concerns, including any change in a patient's condition: After reviewing Mr Pollard's care, it is apparent that opportunities were missed on the morning of 28 June 2016 both to carry out additional assessments following the last NEWS assessment at 06.00 and to alert medical staff of Mr Pollard's symptoms during the night of 27 June It is concerning that following Mr Pollard's transfer from Catherine James Ward to Overton Ward on the morning of 28 June, there is no documentation in the nursing evaluation notes by Overton staff, This would have confirmed how the staff on Overton Ward received Mr Pollard and what handover was given to the shift staff concerning Mr Pollard's condition during the night of 27 June, which had been documented in detail by the night nursing staff on Catherine James Ward , There had also been an opportunity for a further medical assessment of Mr Pollard during the day on 27 June (and after the morning ward round when it was decided that he was ready for discharge) when the Critical Care Outreach Team (CCOT) came to review him: This was a follow up to discussions between Respiratory Medicine and ITU medical staff early that With our partner brighton and sussex medical school key day

morning The CCOT was advised by medical staff on the ward that their intervention was no longer necessary. With hindsight; it would have been beneficial if the CCOT had reviewed Mr Pollard, as this would either have provided further evidence that his condition remained stable or alternatively, could have identified any deterioration since the morning ward round or any other concerns about readiness for discharge. do understand your concern about continuing medical review of complex patients following a decision that are ready for discharge. The Trust is committed to ensuring that all available medical resources are used as effectively as possible; this includes prioritising those patients who will most benefit from direct medical input, rather than providing automatic medical review of all patients: The medical team does review the progress of all MRFD patients on the daily "board round" and will follow up any issues identified either as a result of that process, or arising any request from clinical colleagues, including nurses_ It is very important; therefore, that existing Trust policies are followed from the point when the patient's discharge becomes nurse-led, in responding to changes in patients' symptoms and appropriately requesting medical input; It is equally important that nursing documentation should be adequate_ At the time of Mr Pollard's admission, Overton Ward was designated for the care of patients from a range of clinical specialties who had been assessed as medically ready for discharge_ and there was no lead Consultant for the ward, Since then, Overton has become part of the Respiratory Medicine Unit;, together with Catherine James and Egremont Wards, as wards specifically for Respiratory Medicine patients. There is now a dedicated Respiratory Nursing team for the whole Unit; which also has a lead Consultant, and we try to ensure that a Junior Sister from the Respiratory Team is on duty on Overton Ward each This has greatly improved continuity of care for patients and communication within the team and we are confident that this will enhance the safety of respiratory patients approaching discharge. Events surrounding Mr Pollard's discharge are raised with nursing and medical staff through the Directorate clinical governance meetings and traininglawareness sessions for staff which will continue this year, as a means of ensuring learning: These will focus on ensuring adherence to existing policies in respect of: discharge procedures, responding to changes in patient NEWS scores and other clinical indicators, and iii) appropriate documentation, particularly when a patient is transferred between wards In light of your findings, Mr Pollard's care , which was first discussed at the Respiratory Morbidity and Mortality Meeting in 2016, will be explored again at the next available meeting: It will also be raised at the Trust-wide Deteriorating Patient Steering Group meeting later this month, which is chaired by Deputy Medical Director, Safety & Quality: additional learning identified in inese meerngs will be disseminated to medical and nursing staff A further issue which arose was the mode of Mr Pollard's transfer from the ambulance to his room at Victoria Highgrove Nursing Home and understand that Mrs Pollard expressed concern at the inquest that Mr Pollard had walked a long distance from the vehicle to his room: can confirm that the Trust booked a "sitting" ambulance for Mr Pollard's discharge. Our expectation was that Mr Pollard would be transferred by chair at all times between the hospital and his room at the Nursing Home, based on the level of his mobility while he was in hospital. Mr Pollard was transferred by private ambulance through a company named WANT. appreciate that we cannot be certain what happened on that but will send a copy of this response to the Care Quality Commission, as previously requested by them, in order that can consider this issue further they from day: being Any day they

hope that the above information is helpful and thank you for raising your concerns with the Trust, would also be grateful if you could pass on my condolences to the family and friends of Mr Pollard for their sad loss
Sent To
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 16 Apr 2017
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 25th July, 2016 | commenced an investigation into the death of Mr Raymond Frank POLLARD. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 1gth January,2017. The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative Conclusion
Circumstances of the Death
At the Inquest heard evidence concerning the failed discharge which took place on the 28th Jun 2016. Mr Pollard came into hospital as an emergency on the 10th June with a community acquired pneumonia: He spent several days in the intensive care unit before transferred to the respiratory ward_ The main problems related to his respiratory difficulties and his renal problem which were resulting in metabolic acidosis and high potassium levels_ These conditions needed treating and monitoring: Arterial blood gases revealed that Mr Pollard was improving but from the June and through the 26h and into the 27th June he was quite unwell with potassium levels at 5.6, 5.7 , 6 (in the early hours of 27/6) and 5.8 on the at 10 a.m being 25th 27th

VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY, LLB_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you AND your organisation have the power to take such action.
Copies Sent To
VERONICA HAMILTON DEELEY, LLB
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Specialist Hepatology Centre Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Uncertainty About Fibrosis
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Fibroscan for Liver Imaging
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Consultant Hepatologist Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Commissioning Hepatology Services
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Service change continuity plans
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Continuing responsibility for care
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Follow up of patients
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Care and discharge planning

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.