Lee Grimes
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2016-wp25332
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 20 Sep 2016
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Home health care failed to act on overdose disclosures and ensure follow-up with mental health services, compounded by inadequate staff training in managing overdose reports.
View full coroner's concerns
1. During the inquest evidence was heard that:
i. Mr Grimes suffered with schizophrenia and was under the care of the Mental Health Services. Since 2004 he had been supported in the community by support workers from Next Stage which is a home health care service. They provided assistance to Mr Grimes on a daily basis, Monday to Friday. They would attend at his home address to assist him with basic activities and monitor his mental health. If there was a deterioration in his mental health they would contact the appropriate service to ensure Mr Grimes was assessed and provided with treatment as required.
ii. On Thursday 17th March 2016 a support worker attended upon Mr Grimes and noted that he was not himself. At that time, he disclosed to her that he had taken an excessive dose of his prescribed medication. A note was made of this disclosure but no action was taken following that information being provided to the support worker.
iii. The following day, Friday 18th March, another support worker, attended upon Mr Grimes at about 10am, when he again disclosed that he had taken an overdose of his Procyclidine medication, explaining he had taken 12 tablets. At that time, called Wigan Recovery North, the Community Mental Health Team which is governed by 5 Borough Partnerships NHS Foundation Trust, to speak to a Community Psychiatric Nurse (CPN), to report that Mr Grimes had taken excessive medication. A message was left on an answerphone by requesting a call back and explaining that Mr Grimes had taken an overdose of medication. No return call was made to nor was any further call made to Wigan Recovery North by employees at Next Stage to follow up the initial message left. Mr Grimes did not have any contact with anyone after Friday 18th March and was found dead at his home address on Monday 21st March.
iv. Evidence was given that if a service user discloses they have taken an overdose of medication to a support worker from Next Stage, that support worker should then speak to a CPN from Wigan Recovery North, if the disclosure is made during their operating hours of 9am to 5pm Monday to Friday. If the disclosure is made out of office hours, Next Stage have an out of hours system where action is taken by the person contacted out of hours to further investigate or manage the service user’s wellbeing.
v. Evidence was given by that there is training that Next Stage offer in respect of how to deal with a report of an overdose by a service user, and other situations that may arise when providing support to a service user, but that he had not had any training in 3 years as his workload did not allow him to undertake training. confirmed that he felt he, and the other employees from Next Stage, would benefit from further training, which could prevent a future death.
2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. That no action was taken by an employee of Next Stage following Mr Grimes’ disclosure of an overdose of medication on Thursday the 17th March. I have further concern that when action was taken on the Friday 18th March, a message was left for the Community Mental Health Team which was not followed up by Next Stage, or answered and actioned by the Community Mental Health Team. Although Mr Grimes’ death was not as a result of an overdose, he did not receive any assessment, or treatment, in respect of the overdose he disclosed. In view of the fact that there was no contact from the Next Stage or the Community Mental Health team over the weekend, he was vulnerable to taking a further overdose of medication.
ii. I have concerns that if this situation occurs in the future, another person could die. In view of that I would ask that the current policies and procedures in place at Next Stage to deal with the disclosure of an overdose of medication by a service user, are reviewed, and cascaded down to all employees. I would also request that a review is carried out by 5 Boroughs Partnership of the policies and procedures in place regarding the processing of referrals to Wigan Recovery North given the fact that the message left by on the Friday morning was never acted upon, as if this were to happen again in the future I believe there could be a further death.
i. Mr Grimes suffered with schizophrenia and was under the care of the Mental Health Services. Since 2004 he had been supported in the community by support workers from Next Stage which is a home health care service. They provided assistance to Mr Grimes on a daily basis, Monday to Friday. They would attend at his home address to assist him with basic activities and monitor his mental health. If there was a deterioration in his mental health they would contact the appropriate service to ensure Mr Grimes was assessed and provided with treatment as required.
ii. On Thursday 17th March 2016 a support worker attended upon Mr Grimes and noted that he was not himself. At that time, he disclosed to her that he had taken an excessive dose of his prescribed medication. A note was made of this disclosure but no action was taken following that information being provided to the support worker.
iii. The following day, Friday 18th March, another support worker, attended upon Mr Grimes at about 10am, when he again disclosed that he had taken an overdose of his Procyclidine medication, explaining he had taken 12 tablets. At that time, called Wigan Recovery North, the Community Mental Health Team which is governed by 5 Borough Partnerships NHS Foundation Trust, to speak to a Community Psychiatric Nurse (CPN), to report that Mr Grimes had taken excessive medication. A message was left on an answerphone by requesting a call back and explaining that Mr Grimes had taken an overdose of medication. No return call was made to nor was any further call made to Wigan Recovery North by employees at Next Stage to follow up the initial message left. Mr Grimes did not have any contact with anyone after Friday 18th March and was found dead at his home address on Monday 21st March.
iv. Evidence was given that if a service user discloses they have taken an overdose of medication to a support worker from Next Stage, that support worker should then speak to a CPN from Wigan Recovery North, if the disclosure is made during their operating hours of 9am to 5pm Monday to Friday. If the disclosure is made out of office hours, Next Stage have an out of hours system where action is taken by the person contacted out of hours to further investigate or manage the service user’s wellbeing.
v. Evidence was given by that there is training that Next Stage offer in respect of how to deal with a report of an overdose by a service user, and other situations that may arise when providing support to a service user, but that he had not had any training in 3 years as his workload did not allow him to undertake training. confirmed that he felt he, and the other employees from Next Stage, would benefit from further training, which could prevent a future death.
2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. That no action was taken by an employee of Next Stage following Mr Grimes’ disclosure of an overdose of medication on Thursday the 17th March. I have further concern that when action was taken on the Friday 18th March, a message was left for the Community Mental Health Team which was not followed up by Next Stage, or answered and actioned by the Community Mental Health Team. Although Mr Grimes’ death was not as a result of an overdose, he did not receive any assessment, or treatment, in respect of the overdose he disclosed. In view of the fact that there was no contact from the Next Stage or the Community Mental Health team over the weekend, he was vulnerable to taking a further overdose of medication.
ii. I have concerns that if this situation occurs in the future, another person could die. In view of that I would ask that the current policies and procedures in place at Next Stage to deal with the disclosure of an overdose of medication by a service user, are reviewed, and cascaded down to all employees. I would also request that a review is carried out by 5 Boroughs Partnership of the policies and procedures in place regarding the processing of referrals to Wigan Recovery North given the fact that the message left by on the Friday morning was never acted upon, as if this were to happen again in the future I believe there could be a further death.
Responses
Sent To
- Next Stage
Response Status
Linked responses
2 of 2
56-Day Deadline
20 Sep 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 23rd March 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lee Francis Grimes, born on the 12th September 1975.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 13th July 2016.
The Medical Cause of Death was:
1a Acute Left Ventricular Failure 1b Cocaine Induced Cardiac Ischaemia
The conclusion of the Inquest was Drug Related Death.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 13th July 2016.
The Medical Cause of Death was:
1a Acute Left Ventricular Failure 1b Cocaine Induced Cardiac Ischaemia
The conclusion of the Inquest was Drug Related Death.
Circumstances of the Death
On the 21st March 2016 the deceased, who was known to misuse Cocaine, was found in a collapsed and unresponsive condition in the bedroom at his home address at 8 Avondale Street, Standish, Wigan.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
GMMH local structured risk assessment responsibility
Southport Inquiry
Conflicting mental health care plans
Prevent discharge of hospitalised children with concerns until home is safe
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require consultant or paediatrician permission for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require documented future care plan for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Ensure identified GP for children with deliberate harm concerns discharged from hospital.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require effective communication among healthcare professionals to avoid conflicting patient advice
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Conflicting mental health care plans
Establish comprehensive counselling and support services as integral to patient care
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.