Laura McRory
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2016-0223
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 8 Aug 2016
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The Trust lacked a clear process for employees seeking mental health care, especially regarding confidentiality and external referrals. There was also an inadequate safety plan on discharge and deficiencies in the internal investigation.
View full coroner's concerns
Mrs McRory was employed by the North East London Foundation Trust. She was clearly concerned about providing thorough detailed information to NELFT staff, concerning her mental state and alcohol misuse The evidence revealed a need for a clear process to be in place when NELFT staff require mental health care and express reservations about sharing information with colleagues. The Trust's investigation report found that there were no care or service delivery problems. The report however did not analyse to any degree the issues relating to the complexities surrounding NELFT employees seeking help for mental health conditions. The report also did not to any extent consider whether there was an adequate safety plan in place on discharge. did not consider there to be an adequate safety plan in place for Mrs McRory: He also considered that there needed to be a system in place for staff to be promptly referred to a different Trust where they present with mental health difficulties and request services from a different Trust. Idid confirm that he was in the process of drafting a protocol to deal with this issue. A copy of the draft protocol was not provided. In light of the length of time that has elapsed since the date of Mrs McRory's death and the inadequacies of the Trust's internal investigation , consider it necessary to write a Regulation 28 Report to ensure that the Trust considers the system in place for prompt referrals to be made to another Trust, where necessary, for members of NELFT staff who require mental health care. If a protocol is to be drafted, would the Trust to confirm how this will be disseminated to frontline staff.
Responses
Action Planned
The Trust states it has carefully considered the report and is fully cognisant of the issues and committed to continuously review its service and has enclosed the Trust's action plan to prevent the reoccurrence of the shortcomings identified in your Regulation 28 report (AI summary)
The Trust states it has carefully considered the report and is fully cognisant of the issues and committed to continuously review its service and has enclosed the Trust's action plan to prevent the reoccurrence of the shortcomings identified in your Regulation 28 report (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Persaud, Re: Regulation 28 report_following the _inquest touching the death of Mrs Laura McRory refer to your Regulation 28 report dated 13th June 2016_ The Trust has carefully considered your report and is fully cognisant of the issues you have raised. The Trust is committed to continuously review its service for the purposes of improving quality of care and patient safety and am grateful for bringing these issues to my attention. Please find enclosed the Trust's action plan to prevent the reoccurrence of the shortcomings identified in your Regulation 28 report:
Sent To
- North East London Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
8 Aug 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 24h June 2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Laura Theresa McRory: The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 6"h June 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion: Mrs Laura McRory suffered from severe anxiety and associated alcohol misuse. She was noted to be deteriorating in her mental state and alcohol misuse in the weeks leading up to her death: On 20"h June 2015 she was taken to hospital by her sister in the hope of receiving help. After assessment by a registered mental nurse, she was discharged home, without any immediate follow up or continued observation. The following day her husband found her intoxicated and later unresponsive. She died from alcohol and mixed drug consumption. The evidence does not reveal her intention at the time of consuming the fatal mix of drugs and alcohol.
Circumstances of the Death
Laura McRory was a 40 year old lady who had a past medical history of recurrent episodes of anxiety and depression, associated with alcohol misuse. She worked for the North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT): In the weeks leading up to her death, she suffered a deterioration in her mental state and increase in alcohol consumption. She was taken to Whipps Cross Hospital A&E on the 20"h June 2015. She was assessed by the NELFT psychiatric Iiaison team (a Registered Mental Nurse) . Mrs McRory made it clear that she did not want to be assessed by staff working for the same Trust as her. The RMN in his statement to the Court stated: voluntary psychiatric admission was not the direction Mrs McRory wanted to go, not least because it would have meant further assessment by the Home Treatment Team for consideration; the very same service that she worked in, which would have been utterly humiliating" Mrs McRory was discharged from hospital, following the psychiatric team's assessment.
The following day Mrs McRory was found by her husband to be unresponsive Paramedics were called, but she could not be resuscitated. Post mortem investigations revealed a cause of death of alcohol and mixed drug consumption: heard evidence during the course of the inquest from He confirmed his opinion that a more robust safety plan should have been in place at the end of the psychiatric consultation on the 206h June 2015. In particular; he considered that there should have been a request for Mrs McRory to be admitted under the medical team for observation. An admission under the medical team may well have been acceptable to Mrs McRory as this was not the Trust for whom she worked: It was clear from the evidence of her sisted that the A&E staff had considered that Ms McRory required admission_ also considered that a protocol was required, to deal with the issue of referral out to a neighbouring Trust; where a member of NELFT staff requires mental health care_
The following day Mrs McRory was found by her husband to be unresponsive Paramedics were called, but she could not be resuscitated. Post mortem investigations revealed a cause of death of alcohol and mixed drug consumption: heard evidence during the course of the inquest from He confirmed his opinion that a more robust safety plan should have been in place at the end of the psychiatric consultation on the 206h June 2015. In particular; he considered that there should have been a request for Mrs McRory to be admitted under the medical team for observation. An admission under the medical team may well have been acceptable to Mrs McRory as this was not the Trust for whom she worked: It was clear from the evidence of her sisted that the A&E staff had considered that Ms McRory required admission_ also considered that a protocol was required, to deal with the issue of referral out to a neighbouring Trust; where a member of NELFT staff requires mental health care_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths believe you have the power to take such action: and like and
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Healthcare Professional Suicide Risk
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Healthcare Professional Suicide Risk
Establish continuing professional development requirements
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Healthcare Professional Suicide Risk
Royal College of Surgeons to develop training and explore surgeon age limits
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Healthcare Professional Suicide Risk
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.