David Aughton

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2016-0183
Date of Report 12 May 2016
Coroner Michael Singleton
Response Deadline est. 7 July 2016
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The concerns text for this report is incomplete, so specific issues cannot be identified.
View full coroner's concerns
In the circumstances it is my duty to report to you the
Sent To
  • East Lancashire Healthcare NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 7 Jul 2016
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 27th of January 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of David Aughton aged 63 years: The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest which was concluded on the 11t May 2016. The conclusion of the Inquest was that David Aughton had died from an Accidental Death_
Circumstances of the Death
In August 1999 David Aughton fell and sustained a severe traumatic brain injury which led to epileptic seizures: Those seizures were controlled by lamotrigine and sodium valproate: On the 21s December 2015 he was admitted to the Royal Blackburn Hospital for cystoscopy which was performed under general anaesthetic; Whilst at the Royal Blackburn Hospital he had not been administered his anticonvulsant medication such that on the 22nd December 2015 he had a grand mal convulsion which caused aspiration pneumonia. Thereafter he remained unwell until he died on the 25t January 2016.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action: YouR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report; namely by 7th July 2016. 1, the Coroner, may extend this period, Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action: Otherwise you must explain why no action proposed
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

HIV Eligibility Start Date
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Interferon Treatment Impacts
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Special Category Mechanism
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Effective Treatment - Earnings Floor
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Deeming of Severity Bands
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Evidence of Diagnosis Date
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Financial Loss and Care
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Exceptional Loss Evidence
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Unethical Research Award
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Wider Definition of Unethical Research
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.