Nadim Butt
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2016-0137
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The hospital failed to conduct a serious untoward incident review or root cause analysis, limiting critical examination of decisions. Additionally, a necessary consultant-led out-of-hours rota for post-surgery patients was not yet implemented.
View full coroner's concerns
Whilst the hospital sought a review of procedures and protocols the matter was not elevated to a serious untoward incident or root cause analysis where all matters including clinical and nursing decisions were reviewed and subjected to critical examination:
2. Despite the recognition that a consultant-led out of on-call rota is required for patients having undergone surgery_no such rota is yet in place ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Friday 10 June 2016]. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to following Interested Persons: ((sister of the deceased) Healthcare Governance Manager Patient Safety, RSUH am also under a duty to send Chief Coroner a copy of your response: The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form: He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest: You may make representations to me, the coroner, at time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner: e/oa/zol6 and hours the the the
2. Despite the recognition that a consultant-led out of on-call rota is required for patients having undergone surgery_no such rota is yet in place ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Friday 10 June 2016]. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to following Interested Persons: ((sister of the deceased) Healthcare Governance Manager Patient Safety, RSUH am also under a duty to send Chief Coroner a copy of your response: The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form: He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest: You may make representations to me, the coroner, at time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner: e/oa/zol6 and hours the the the
Sent To
- University Hospital of North Midlands
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
2 Jun 2016
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.