Norah Fairhurst
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2016-0012
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 14 Mar 2016
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Older large goods vehicles, not mandated to have Class VI "cyclops" mirrors, have a dangerous blind spot directly in front, making pedestrians invisible to the driver and increasing collision risk.
View full coroner's concerns
14th lorry from the
During the inquest evidence was heard that: The heaw goods vehicle involved in the collision was in good working condition and had visibility mirrors in accordance with legislation: diving was in accordance with that of reasonable and competent driver. At the time of the collision Mrs Fairhurst had crossed the road in such a manner that she would not have been visible to to the collision, either in any of the mirrors of the vehicle, or from his direct line of vision from the vehicle: ii I heard evidence that there are many blind spots on large goods vehicle, but one of the most concerning blind spots is in front of the vehicle. Due to the size and height of a large goods vehicle a driver is unable to see directly in front of vehicle and so if a pedestrian or were in front of the vehicle, the driver would not see them: iii I heard evidence that in 2008 legislation came into force that required any large goods vehicle registered after a certain date to have a Class VI mirror, also known as a cyclops mirror, fitted to the front of the vehicle so that the driver would be able to see directly in front of the vehicle: If used appropriately this mirror could therefore identify anyone, Or anything, in front of the vehicle; The legislation however, did not provide for the of such mirrors to large good vehicles registered before 2008.
iv.
During the inquest evidence was heard that: The heaw goods vehicle involved in the collision was in good working condition and had visibility mirrors in accordance with legislation: diving was in accordance with that of reasonable and competent driver. At the time of the collision Mrs Fairhurst had crossed the road in such a manner that she would not have been visible to to the collision, either in any of the mirrors of the vehicle, or from his direct line of vision from the vehicle: ii I heard evidence that there are many blind spots on large goods vehicle, but one of the most concerning blind spots is in front of the vehicle. Due to the size and height of a large goods vehicle a driver is unable to see directly in front of vehicle and so if a pedestrian or were in front of the vehicle, the driver would not see them: iii I heard evidence that in 2008 legislation came into force that required any large goods vehicle registered after a certain date to have a Class VI mirror, also known as a cyclops mirror, fitted to the front of the vehicle so that the driver would be able to see directly in front of the vehicle: If used appropriately this mirror could therefore identify anyone, Or anything, in front of the vehicle; The legislation however, did not provide for the of such mirrors to large good vehicles registered before 2008.
iv.
Responses
Action Planned
The Department for Transport is working to improve direct and indirect vision for drivers, including international agreement to allow camera systems instead of mirrors, developing aerodynamic HGVs, and working with stakeholders on safer lorry designs. (AI summary)
The Department for Transport is working to improve direct and indirect vision for drivers, including international agreement to allow camera systems instead of mirrors, developing aerodynamic HGVs, and working with stakeholders on safer lorry designs. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Griffin Thank you for your letter of 18 January addressed to the Secretary of State, enclosing a Regulation 28 Report on the investigation into the death of Mrs Norah Fairhurst. The circumstances of this accident are that Mrs Fairhurst had crossed the road in such manner that she would not have been visible to the driver. On conclusion of the inquest you made a finding that future deaths could occur if pedestrians and cyclists are located directly in front of a large goods vehicle which is exempt the requirement to have a Class VI mirror. You have requested that a review be carried out on the regulations to consider the retro-fitting of a Class VI mirror to currently exempt vehicles. am replying as Head of the International Vehicle Standards Division of the Department for Transport (DfT) as this division has responsibility for road vehicle safety standards. Directive 2003/97/EC relates to the fitting of indirect vision devices, including the Class VI mirror to heavy goods vehicles for new types of vehicle with effect from 26 January 2006. The directive postponed the fitting of the Class VI mirror for a further year (26 January
2007). In line with common practice, manufacturers applied for a derogation for existing types of new vehicles for a further year to enable them to sell existing stocks of vehicles that had already been manufactured, and up to 4,500 vehicles have been in this category: trust this explains why we applied the exemption until 26 January 2008 if a Class VI mirror was not fitted, would like to assure you that the Department takes the safety of all road users very seriously and my team is active in the area of improving vision for drivers, both direct and indirect; Last year we carried out preliminary work on retrofitting a Class VI mirror to currently exempt vehicles from January 2000 onwards: Although there are a number of collisions involving vulnerable road users and goods vehicles each year; the benefit of a Class VI mirror is limited to circumstances where the vehicle is stationary and about to move off. This is reflected in casualty statistics which show little difference for such collisions involving pre and post 2007 vehicles. Consideration has been given to developing other solutions to provide protection for a wide range of vulnerable road users, and efforts have focussed on ways of providing enhanced vision for drivers May Mary lorry from may
Agreement has recently been reached at international level to permit the replacement of all mirrors by camera systems. These will in future be available on an optional basis so that operators can choose a vehicle specification that is most appropriate for the nature of their operation. Cameras can already be fitted in addition to mirrors. Further work is ongoing in the EU to enable heavy goods vehicles to be more aerodynamic and provide improved safety for vulnerable road users. Engineers from my team are fully engaged in this work which lead to the development of enhanced type approval standards for new vehicles, allowing operators to have safer vehicles without the need to compromise on load carrying capacity_ The Department is also working with the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) , Transport for London (TfL) and other stakeholders on HGV safety. This activity includes the development and promotion of safer lorry designs: The work is informed by research which has been carried out for DfT and TfL Manufacturers are being encouraged to develop new vehicle designs that offer better direct vision, and some improved vehicle designs are currently undergoing trials with operators in London: A number of aftermarket devices to detect vulnerable road users have been assessed to develop a method for ranking these devices, and stakeholders from the operating industry are involved in all of this work; am grateful to you for raising this incident with me, and wish to assure you that improving direct and indirect vision for drivers is a subject where the Department is taking steps to bring about tangible improvements in safety. Yacv, ancet& (ou4a / Ilan Yarnold Head; International Vehicle Standards Division will key
2007). In line with common practice, manufacturers applied for a derogation for existing types of new vehicles for a further year to enable them to sell existing stocks of vehicles that had already been manufactured, and up to 4,500 vehicles have been in this category: trust this explains why we applied the exemption until 26 January 2008 if a Class VI mirror was not fitted, would like to assure you that the Department takes the safety of all road users very seriously and my team is active in the area of improving vision for drivers, both direct and indirect; Last year we carried out preliminary work on retrofitting a Class VI mirror to currently exempt vehicles from January 2000 onwards: Although there are a number of collisions involving vulnerable road users and goods vehicles each year; the benefit of a Class VI mirror is limited to circumstances where the vehicle is stationary and about to move off. This is reflected in casualty statistics which show little difference for such collisions involving pre and post 2007 vehicles. Consideration has been given to developing other solutions to provide protection for a wide range of vulnerable road users, and efforts have focussed on ways of providing enhanced vision for drivers May Mary lorry from may
Agreement has recently been reached at international level to permit the replacement of all mirrors by camera systems. These will in future be available on an optional basis so that operators can choose a vehicle specification that is most appropriate for the nature of their operation. Cameras can already be fitted in addition to mirrors. Further work is ongoing in the EU to enable heavy goods vehicles to be more aerodynamic and provide improved safety for vulnerable road users. Engineers from my team are fully engaged in this work which lead to the development of enhanced type approval standards for new vehicles, allowing operators to have safer vehicles without the need to compromise on load carrying capacity_ The Department is also working with the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) , Transport for London (TfL) and other stakeholders on HGV safety. This activity includes the development and promotion of safer lorry designs: The work is informed by research which has been carried out for DfT and TfL Manufacturers are being encouraged to develop new vehicle designs that offer better direct vision, and some improved vehicle designs are currently undergoing trials with operators in London: A number of aftermarket devices to detect vulnerable road users have been assessed to develop a method for ranking these devices, and stakeholders from the operating industry are involved in all of this work; am grateful to you for raising this incident with me, and wish to assure you that improving direct and indirect vision for drivers is a subject where the Department is taking steps to bring about tangible improvements in safety. Yacv, ancet& (ou4a / Ilan Yarnold Head; International Vehicle Standards Division will key
Sent To
- Department for Transport
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
14 Mar 2016
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Circumstances of the Death
At around 14.47 hours on Saturday the 8t August 2015 a Volvo FRH, Articulated Lorry, registration number was being_driven along Gerard Street on the A58 in Ashton in Makerfield, Wigan bv The vehicle is a left hand drive model which was registered in the UK: As the approached puffin crossing on Gerard street; the traffic lights changed to red and slowed down in accordance with the requirements of the red light. At this time Mrs Fairhurst crossed Gerard street considerable distance from the puffin crossing at diagonal angle, approaching the vehicle the right hand side: As the lights changed to green continued on his journey and the vehicle collided with Mrs Fairhurst; who at this point was directly in front of vehicle, causing her multiple injuries which led to her death;
Copies Sent To
Solicitor, Kennedys Law LLP on behalf of I have also sent this report to the Forensic Collision Reconstruction Unit of Greater Manchester Police
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.