Alan Walker

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response)
Date of Report 14 December 2015
Coroner John Gittins
Response Deadline ✓ from report 8 February 2016
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Critical information was not consistently recorded in nursing notes, and handovers did not reference these records, risking significant patient details being missed by incoming staff.
View full coroner's concerns
That by not recording within the notes the type of issue referred to in paragraph 4 (b) above and then by not conducting handovers by reference to the nursing notes there is a risk that potentially significant information is not relayed to staff who come on duty at a later time day from feeding any
Sent To
  • BCUHB, Ysbyty Gwynedd
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 8 Feb 2016
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 24th of January 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of Alan Walker (DOB 11.08.32, DOD 23.01.14). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 11th of December 2015 and recorded a conclusion of Accidental Death
Circumstances of the Death
(a) The Circumstances of the death are that on the 22nd of January 2014 a nasogastric feeding set was connected to the IV Iine of the deceased, which resulted in the intravenous infusion of liquid feed as a consequence of which he died the following due to 1(a) Toxic Shock (b) During the afternoon of the 22n the NG tube had become detached the set on two occasions in quick succession and had thereafter been taped together, however these events were not recorded in the nursing notes and therefore other staff were not made aware that there may be a connectivity issue with this equipment during handover. Furthermore, staff handovers may not in event be conducted by way of reference to the nursing notes
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken t prevent future deaths and believe your organisations have the power to take such action;
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

HIV Eligibility Start Date
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Interferon Treatment Impacts
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Special Category Mechanism
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Effective Treatment - Earnings Floor
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Deeming of Severity Bands
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Evidence of Diagnosis Date
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Financial Loss and Care
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Exceptional Loss Evidence
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Unethical Research Award
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning
Wider Definition of Unethical Research
Infected Blood Inquiry
Clinical negligence harms learning

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.