Glenda Day
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2015-0410
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A doctor granted home leave without reviewing the patient or updating risk assessments, exposing a lack of clear written policies and consistent, trust-wide adherence to safe home leave procedures.
View full coroner's concerns
It would appear that twice granted Glenda home leave by telephone, without seeing the patient himself. On the first occasion (5 March); he did ask a trainee to see her first. On the second (12 March) ; he appears simply to have repeated view of 9 March (when he last saw Glenda) without seeing her first, or asking a colleague to see her; despite the significant events which had occurred between 9 and 12 March: Her risk assessment had also not been updated since her overdose on 10 March_ Ward B2 have addressed this and was satisfied that current ward and medical staff are now clear that before any patient is granted home leave, helshe must have his been reviewed by a doctor and had his/her risk assessment reviewed. remain concerned however for patients across the wider trust and indeed for this ward when new staff are taken on, who may not be familiar with this tragic case_ It seems to me very important to have these requirements enshrined in written policies understand that some work has already into this_ was advised that a Home Leave Policy does exist for the Ward B2, but neither the ward manager nor the most senior nurse was able to tell me with any certainty whether these were in fact new requirements, Or requirements that were already contained with the existing policy, which had been overlooked. was also concerned that the focus was very much on this ward, rather than the trust as a whole. Whilst was advised that a trustwide review is ongoing (dealing with involuntary patients as well), no witness could tell me whether these requirements are likely to be included in a trustwide policy; and when this review will be completed: remain concerned that the focus of this investigation has been too narrow. It is clearly important that these requirements are included in the written Home Leave Policy; and communicated to all relevant staff, across the trust. It is also concerning that there appears to be no timescale for the two requirements referred to above ie how contemporary does a doctor review and risk assessment review need to be before the patient can be granted home leave am also concerned to know about the trust's plan in terms of staff awareness of home leave policies, across the trust; as well as auditing; to ensure that the policy is adhered to.
Sent To
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
17 Dec 2015
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 26 June 2015, commenced an investigation into the death of Glenda Day, aged 50 (DoB 17 January 1965).The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 October 2015.The conclusion of the inquest was that her cause of death was opiate toxicity A conclusion of suicide was recorded.
Circumstances of the Death
Glenda Day had a history of mental health problems back over many years_ She was admitted to ward B2 at Bassetlaw Hospital on 5 February 2015 (having initially been treated in Harrogate from 3r February) following an overdose. On 5 March 2015_ consultant psychiatrist; advised that Glenda could have home leave_ This advice was given by him over the telephone, without reviewing the patient himself. On that occasion; he did however ask for a trainee, to see Glenda before she went home_ saw Glenda himself on 9 March, after her return from home leave. He determined that she could have a further period of home leave, and thereafter, they wouid consider discharging her. Glenda was re-admitted via the ED 00 MOLMarcb taking an overdose of Quitiepine and Oromorph: Following review by 1 March; it was recorded that Glenda did not regret her actions_ and felt bad that she had not succeeded , She described having no protective factors and having ongoing suicidal thoughts with plan: recorded the view that Glenda was at high risk and that further home leave should be suspended until the next review. dating alter
Glenda was however given home leave the following day. The records show that she wanted to leave the ward, and the initial plan, until around 600hrs, was thatl would come and reviewhher There is a further record (at 724hrs) of a telephone conversation between and ward staff. Isaid that Glenda could be allowed home leave that evening He said at the inquest hearing that he had been too busy to see Glenda that evening had not seen Glenda since 9 March 2015 He told the court that he was aware of Glenda's overdose the previous day and note of 11 March. In her statement; Istates that did not consult the records before giving this advice. Ward staff were concerned about Glenda going home that evening, and asked the on-call doctor to review her. She was seen bi I(note recorded at 1827), who agreed that she could go on home leave note records that the family were concerned about her going home at that time_ Glenda left after review. Sadly, Glenda went home and took a fatal overdose_ She died on 13 March 2015. The completion of the inquest started on 23 September 2015,and was due to finish that day: At that hearing, Itold us that he felt that everything possible had been done for Glenda, and that; If he treated another patient like her; he would not do anything differently. This concerned me greatly, as did the trust's action plan, which felt was incomplete. therefore adourned the inquest part-heard, and re-listed it for 20 October 2015. At this hearing_ laccepted that he should not have granted Glenda home leave 0n 12 March 2015, by telephone, without further review; and that her risk assessment should have been updated. noted from her records that it appeared Glenda was always a patient who complied with medical advice. She waited to be reviewed by doctors before leaving on 12 March although she was a voluntary patient: found that; on the balance of probabilities_ hhad refused her home leave on 12 March, she would have remained on the ward and would not have taken the fatal overdose which caused her death on 13 March: Glenda was of course reviewed byl before she left on 12 March: He agreed that she could have home leave. This review only took place at the request of ward staff, however, who were clearly concerned about her leaving without further assessment:
Glenda was however given home leave the following day. The records show that she wanted to leave the ward, and the initial plan, until around 600hrs, was thatl would come and reviewhher There is a further record (at 724hrs) of a telephone conversation between and ward staff. Isaid that Glenda could be allowed home leave that evening He said at the inquest hearing that he had been too busy to see Glenda that evening had not seen Glenda since 9 March 2015 He told the court that he was aware of Glenda's overdose the previous day and note of 11 March. In her statement; Istates that did not consult the records before giving this advice. Ward staff were concerned about Glenda going home that evening, and asked the on-call doctor to review her. She was seen bi I(note recorded at 1827), who agreed that she could go on home leave note records that the family were concerned about her going home at that time_ Glenda left after review. Sadly, Glenda went home and took a fatal overdose_ She died on 13 March 2015. The completion of the inquest started on 23 September 2015,and was due to finish that day: At that hearing, Itold us that he felt that everything possible had been done for Glenda, and that; If he treated another patient like her; he would not do anything differently. This concerned me greatly, as did the trust's action plan, which felt was incomplete. therefore adourned the inquest part-heard, and re-listed it for 20 October 2015. At this hearing_ laccepted that he should not have granted Glenda home leave 0n 12 March 2015, by telephone, without further review; and that her risk assessment should have been updated. noted from her records that it appeared Glenda was always a patient who complied with medical advice. She waited to be reviewed by doctors before leaving on 12 March although she was a voluntary patient: found that; on the balance of probabilities_ hhad refused her home leave on 12 March, she would have remained on the ward and would not have taken the fatal overdose which caused her death on 13 March: Glenda was of course reviewed byl before she left on 12 March: He agreed that she could have home leave. This review only took place at the request of ward staff, however, who were clearly concerned about her leaving without further assessment:
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Apply best offer principle equally in GLOS
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Set deadline for HSS claims with guidance on late applications
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Devise redress process for affected family members
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Outdated Operational Guidance
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.