(1) Immediately prior to his surgery, Mr Quinn’s blood sugar level was measured at 13mmol. This was made known to the treating surgeon and anesthetist who considered it appropriate to proceed with the surgery. It is recognised that raised blood glucose levels in diabetic patients increases the potential risk of infection. In the course of the evidence at the Inquest I heard that the hospitals guidance for acceptable levels of blood glucose levels in patients undergoing spinal surgery was no more than 15mmol. I understand that national guidance recommends a target blood glucose level of 6 to 10mmol with an acceptable level of between 4 and 12 mmol. I heard that other Hospitals Trusts do use a level of up to 15mmol but the root cause analysis report prepared on behalf of the Circle Hospital following Mr Quinn’s death, included a recommendation that the hospital theatre department audit intra-operative blood glucose levels in patients based on a level of below 11mmol. I also heard in evidence that an American publication made reference to risk factors for infection with a pre-operative serum glucose level of greater than 6 to 9 and a post-operative level of 11.1mmol. I also heard that one hospital trust used a figure of 20 as the highest acceptable level and Diabetes Scotland quoted a level of 14mmol.

(2) It is clear to me that there is a great deal of confusion about what is an appropriate level for patients such as Mr Quinn and the optimal blood glucose level that should be achieved in patients, diabetic or otherwise, prior to surgery. While I did not find at the Inquest that Mr Quinn’s blood glucose level of 13mmol was a factor in the infection that led to his death, I am nevertheless concerned that the written policy in place at the time does not mirror that of the national guidelines and is also at odds with other published research articles.

(3) I am directing this report to you because I understand that the method adopted by Circle Hospital was based on the policy of your Trust which took the lead in these matters. In those circumstances, I would invite the Trust to review its policy to determine whether the current recommended levels are appropriate in light of other current guidelines and evidence based research.