William Jackson

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2014-0509
Date of Report 24 November 2014
Coroner D LI Roberts
Response Deadline est. 19 January 2015
All 1 response received · Deadline: 19 Jan 2015
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The hospital lacked a formal system to record specialist advice given during informal interactions, leading to critical advice being given without reviewing patient images, which risks lives.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) The CIC records showed that an A&E doctor had spoken to a Specialist Cardio Thoracic Registrar at the Freeman Hospital. Inquiries of the Freeman showed that there was no recordlrecollection of this contact; (2) understand there is no system at the Freeman to formally record sudden interactions. This means no traceable record and no means by which the Freeman doctor could be identified let alone recall the advice given.

(3) The advice appears to have been given without the Freeman doctor actually seeing the CT Scan. Has the images been reviewed it is possible that the true state of the deceased'$ health would have been ascertained.

(4) Independent of the issue of an enquiry being able to establish what advice was given at the time; there is a risk that the way such advice appears to have been given could place patients lives at risk:
Responses
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
23 Jan 2015
Action Taken
An electronic system is now in place within Cardiothoracic Surgery to record details of advice given when medical opinion is sought by a healthcare professional in another hospital. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Sir I refer to your letter dated 24 November 2014 regarding William Walton Jackson understand that your concerns relate to the 'Itcording/ 02/ cOaltoniCacioon bebecensede the Cardiothoracic Specialist Registrar at Freeman Hospital and staff at Cumberland Infirary. understand that the Cumberland Infirmary Accident & Emergency Department records do Fot indicate the exact time that the request for advice Wes made to the Specialist Registrar at Freeman Hospital. The Registrar on the night shift Idoes not recollect the patient but advises it is his usual practice to review diagnostic scanslimages if are available before offering an opinion. It is documented that Mr Jackson arrived at the Accident & Emergency Department at 13.30 hours. The arrival time and the of the CT scan undertaken at Cumberland Infirmary does serve to suggest it is most likely that an opinion was sought the shift, this period the Specialist Registrar was & locum; and it has not been possible to make contact with him. It has therefore not been possible to confirm if he gave the advice O indeed whether or not he viewed the scans himself before he provided that advice. It is however usual practice throughout Cardiothoracic Surgery to review the scans themselves, if available; before providing advice in such cases Scans sent from other hospitals are received via the Radiology Picture Archiving and Communication System (a computerised digital infrastructure), but only remain on the system for & finite period unless & request is made to be permanently archived, A record of receipt of the scans is created automatically on the system; however this original record is over written by the system if a subsequent request is made, as occurred in this case; It is therefore not possible to confirm whether or not the scans had been received at the Freeman Hospital at the time the opinion was provided In response to the Regulation 28 letter and as part of ongoing quality improvements the Regional Cardiothoracic Centre at the Freeman Hospital has addressed the following actions: Kingsley W: Smith OBE, Chairman Sir Leonard Fenwick CBE, Chief Executive the they timing during day During

Actions already taken: An electronic system is now in place within Cardiothoracic to record details of advice given when medical opinion is sought by healthcare professional in another hospital The Cardiothoracic Surgical Team is fully aware of the need to ensure consistency when this system on receiving requests for & medical opinion from outside of the Trust and where there is no opportunity to make a documented statement in the medical record (ii) Further planned actions: The importance of the electronic system to record the details of opinions sought, information available 0 the system been be included in the induction programme of newly recruited staff including trainees who are 0n rotation other parts of the NHS. The current system is further developed throughout the Newcastle Hospitals to prompt recording of items including information regarding radiological images viewed at the time of providing an opinion. I do this commitment and set of actions taken shall provide the assurances sought Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any clarification.
Sent To
  • Newcastle Foundation NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 19 Jan 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 2.12.2013 commenced an investigation into the death of William Walter Jackson Aged 78_ The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6.11.14 The conclusion of the inquest was Ia) Haemothorax b) Ruptural descending thoracic aortic aneurysm Conclusion: Natural Causes
Circumstances of the Death
In the spring of 2013 the deceased was diagnosed with severe aortic regurgitation, large ascending aortic aneurysm and severely impaired left ventricular function. His descending aorta was also aneurysmal In the 26'h June 2013 he underwent an operation at the Freeman Hospital to replace the aortic valve and the ascending aorta. The plan was to review the descending aorta in Spring 2014. By the Bank Holiday Monday of the 26t August 2013 he had become unwell At the Cumberland Infirmary on the 27h August a CT Scan of his aorta was performed: This scan revealed there was haemorrhage in the descending aorta. The reporting radiologist did not perceive the increase in thickness of the aortic wall and intramural haematoma evidencing, at last stage, a contained rupture_ This lack of appreciation of acute aortic pathology resulted in an inaccurate report which was relied on by subsequent clinicians. He left the hospital on the 27 but was admitted as an inpatient on the 30"h August and died on the 4lh September 2013. The true nature of his presenting problem was not diagnosed by his treating clinicians, but had it been; on the balance of probability it is unlikely that anything other than conservative treatment would have been proposed. and
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken t0 prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action;
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Common information practices shared data and electronic records
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Ensure patients receive copies of all inter-professional letters about their care
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Provide parents of young children with copies of all inter-professional healthcare letters
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
National guidance on SMART action points
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Share Clinical Assessor Advice
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.