Lee Friend
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2014-0372
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Insufficient visibility for temporary traffic lights and absent guidance for placement near blind bends created road safety risks, compounded by a lack of clear police protocol for reporting such hazards.
View full coroner's concerns
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed a number matters that gave rise to a concern that circumstances creating a risk of other deaths will continue to exist in the future unless action is taken.
1. Action is required to ensure that when temporary traffic lights are placed there is a minimum distance of visibility (line of sight) between approaching drivers and the temporary traffic light heads. Further, guidance or training should be provided to operatives as to placing traffic lights near to blind bends or where waiting traffic will encroach upon blind bends.
2. Action is required by Surrey Police to formulate a clear policy/protocol for all Officers to follow when they identify a risk created to the public by road works which should include a clear route allow them to locate who is responsible for the placing of the road works if not apologies board is seen/present.
RT4210
1. Action is required to ensure that when temporary traffic lights are placed there is a minimum distance of visibility (line of sight) between approaching drivers and the temporary traffic light heads. Further, guidance or training should be provided to operatives as to placing traffic lights near to blind bends or where waiting traffic will encroach upon blind bends.
2. Action is required by Surrey Police to formulate a clear policy/protocol for all Officers to follow when they identify a risk created to the public by road works which should include a clear route allow them to locate who is responsible for the placing of the road works if not apologies board is seen/present.
RT4210
Sent To
- Department for Transport
- Surrey Police
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 4
56-Day Deadline
1 Oct 2014
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
The inquest into Lee Michael Friend’s death was opened on the 25th February 2013 was resumed with a jury on 29th of July 2014. The Jury returned their conclusion on the 6th August 2014.
The jury found the cause of death was: 1a – Medullary Transection 1b – Fracture of the Cervical Spine
The Jury returned a narrative conclusion:
On the 21st February 2013 Mr. Friend died as a result of a road traffic collision on the A217 Dovers Green Road. On the balance of probabilities the manner in which the motorcycle was ridden was one of three material contributions to his death. The other material factors that contributed to his death were the positioning of the lights and signs associated with the road works and risk assessments carried out by Sutton and East Surrey Water PLC. were inadequate. Finally, the conduct of Surrey Police following attendance at a road traffic collision on the 20th February 2013 RT4210 involving the inadequacy or otherwise of Surrey Police’s assessment, response and failure to identify risk to life following the incident on the 20th February 2013.
The jury found the cause of death was: 1a – Medullary Transection 1b – Fracture of the Cervical Spine
The Jury returned a narrative conclusion:
On the 21st February 2013 Mr. Friend died as a result of a road traffic collision on the A217 Dovers Green Road. On the balance of probabilities the manner in which the motorcycle was ridden was one of three material contributions to his death. The other material factors that contributed to his death were the positioning of the lights and signs associated with the road works and risk assessments carried out by Sutton and East Surrey Water PLC. were inadequate. Finally, the conduct of Surrey Police following attendance at a road traffic collision on the 20th February 2013 RT4210 involving the inadequacy or otherwise of Surrey Police’s assessment, response and failure to identify risk to life following the incident on the 20th February 2013.
Circumstances of the Death
On 20th February 2013 Sutton and East Surrey Water placed road works and a two‐way traffic light system beyond what was described as a blind bend. The placing of the lights meant that traffic held by the lights backed up towards the blind bend. A member of the public expressed concerns to the Council that same morning about the proximity of the lights to the bend. That afternoon there was a road traffic collision at the location, which was attended by Police. Despite having concerns over safety to the public the Officer attending did not report these concerns to the relevant authority. The following morning (21st February 2013) there was a similar road traffic collision at the same place. As a result the traffic was stationery just beyond the blind bend. Mr Friend, a motorcyclist travelling at speed, negotiated the bend and collided with one of the stationery cars before being projected into the path of an oncoming car thereby sustaining the injuries from which he died.
Copies Sent To
Simon Wickens
DATED this 6th day of August 2014
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Recording words and behaviour of high-risk individuals
Southport Inquiry
Police investigation management
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Police investigation management
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.