Georgina Taylor

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2014-0328
Date of Report 9 July 2014
Coroner Simon Nelson
Response Deadline est. 3 September 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Outdated design standards meant that developing soft estate, specifically trees within 4.5m of the carriageway, lacked required vehicle restraint protection or removal, posing a highway safety risk.
View full coroner's concerns
_ The section of the A627(M) where this incident occurred forms the south bank carriageway of the motorway, approaching Junction 1 at Chadderton, Oldham. The A627(M) is a two lane, dual carriageway and is subject to motorway regulations including the national (70 miles per hour) speed restriction. introduction of the interim requirements for road restraint systems in 2002 identified that all trees with a girth exceeding SOOmm (or several closely spaced trees) located within a distance of 4.5m from the carriageway require protection. The re-issued requirements in 2004 identified that trees above 300mm_in girth should be_protected by a suitable vehicle restraint system: losing being The paved

3. Current design standard TD19/06 includes a site specific risk process where topographical features together with adjacent sources of risk are reviewed in order to identify the most appropriate restraint facility and containment levels and that in relation to the presence of trees adjacent to the nearside verge and protection requirements, it is unclear as to when these germinated and it is likely that they are all 'self-seeded' with the larger specimens over 10 years old_ Whilst the vehicle restraint systems in place comply with identified requirements at the time of the construction of the route there are no current requirements to inspect soft estate as it develops in terms of assessing protection requirements The application of more recent design standards would have required some of the trees at this location to be protected (as well as the lighting columns) or removed within the 4.5m threshold: Jin evidence stated that 'it might be prudent to remove some of the trees and that the issue of a Regulation 28 report would generate a review of the area in question'_
Sent To
  • Department for Transport
  • Highways Agency
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 2
56-Day Deadline 3 Sep 2014
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 31s January 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of Georgina Lauren Taylor whose death was reported to my office on the 27th January 2014. The cause of death following Post Mortem Examination was that of 1a) Multi-organ injury. finalised the Inquest on the 25th June 2014 with a conclusion of 'Road Traffic Collision' .
Circumstances of the Death
A combination of inexperience and excessive speed contributed to the driver control of a motor vehicle which was driven in lane 2 of 2 on the A627(M) whereupon the vehicle rotated anti-clockwise through 90 degrees as it crossed lane 1 and mounted the embankment to the nearside where the rear offside of the vehicle collided with a tree which impact resulted in the vehicle rolling up onto the tree ad rotating clockwise through 180 Degrees before coming to rest.
Action Should Be Taken
Department of Transport in conjunction with The Highways Agency to consider the implications to ameliorate and or negate the consequences arising the impact of motor vehicles with road lighting columns and trees,

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.