James McArdle

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2014-0264
Date of Report 8 June 2014
Coroner Alan Wilson
Coroner Area Wirral
Response Deadline ✓ from report 4 August 2014
All 1 response received · Deadline: 4 Aug 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The withdrawal of a coloured wristband system for falls risk without replacement removed a vital protection, increasing the risk of falls for elderly patients.
View full coroner's concerns
That whatever the thinking was as regards the merits of the coloured wrist band system, the system has been withdrawn and not replaced In process a level of the from two falls, The and the_

protection against elderly patients at risk of suffering a fall has been removed, am concerned that unless a review is undertaken and some new measure[s] introduced then patients such as the Deceased may be at a heightened risk of falls and future deaths may result
Responses
Wirral University Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
1 Jun 2014
Action Planned
The Trust is developing a new policy specific to patient falls, providing clearer guidance on risk assessments and timescales, and will communicate changes to nursing staff and revise audit questionnaires to monitor compliance. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Wilson Regulation 28 Report issued on 1th June 2014 following inquest into the death of James McArdle Thank you for your report to prevent future deaths, dated 10th June. As directed by the report; am writing to respond to the concerns which you expressed. The report stated that, "whatever the thinking as regards the merits of the coloured wrist band system, the system has been withdrawn and not replaced, and in the process & level of protection against elderly patients at risk of falling from suffering a fall has been removed: am concerned that unless & review is undertaken and some new measures introduced, then patients such as the Deceased may be at heightened risk of falls and future deaths may result". In 2007 , the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) issued guidance to NHS Trusts on the subject of patient identity wristbands (Safer Practice Notice no. 24, published 3.7,07) : Safer Practice Notices are not legally binding;, but Trusts are 'strongly advised' to implement them: The NPSA advised that wristbands should be white, and contain the patient's first name, last name, date of birth, and NHS number. However; where Trusts wanted to identify a known risk specific to that patient; a red wristband could be used, with a white panel to highlight the text: Red was the only colour permissible: Previously in this Trust; the red wristbands were used to denote a number of risk factors including falls, allergies, blood transfusion risks and implanted defibrillators. This meant that in some wards particularly_those with more_elderly_patients_the_majority of_patients_would_ #PROUD TO CARE FOR YOU wuth nhs.uk @wuthnhs #proud

Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS] NHS Foundation Trust have one or more of these risk factors and would therefore be wearing red wristbands. The result was that the red wristband lost its impact. In October 2013 the Trust's Clinical Governance Group resolved that red wristbands should be used to denote allergies only: This decision was influenced by number of serious incidents, including one where patient was prescribed and given a medicine to which were known to be allergic This change of procedure was communicated to Trust staff by means of an internal safety alert in November 2013. Potentially every patient is at risk of and thus all inpatients are assessed for their risk of falling on admission. This risk assessment has to be repeated if later suffer fall in the hospital. Depending on the patient's level of risk and their individual circumstances, different measures will be used, such as stockings with extra grip, or bed rails_ Such measures have proven to be more effective than placing a red wristband on the patients arm: In recent years the Trust has done a great deal of work to reduce the number of falls in our hospitals. Not all falls are preventable , but we aim to minimise the number of falls and the harm caused_ In the last financial year (April 2013-March 2014), we set target for ourselves to reduce by 50% cases of preventable falls resulting in serious harm or death. We achieved this target and during the year there was an overall reduction in all falls, both with and without harm_ A number of different initiatives contributed to this improvement For example, in a number of medical and older peoples' wards, we have implemented new assisted technology which alerts nurses when a patient tries to stand up or walk around: We have also improved how we complete comfort checks for patients, and events such as the Falls Summit; which took place in March 2014, have helped to ensure that our nurses are aware of best practice: This work formed part of Safety Express, a nationwide programme to improve patient safety in the NHS. Although we have made progress this sad case reminds us that there is more t0 do. In April this year; your colleague issued report in relation to a case at Arrowe Park Hospital which involved an unwitnessed fall: As part of our response to that report; we revisited our Trust on the Prevention of Slips, Trips and Falls. This covers falls by patients, but also falls by employees or visitors: We are now developing a separate policy which will be specific to patient falls. It will provide clearer guidance about how risk assessments should be completed, and the timescales for so, thus making staff more accountable The work is being led by an experienced Matron from our Acute and Medical Specialties Division. When the new policy is adopted, the revised process will be communicated to nursing staff by variety of means including Ward Sisters' meetings and our weekly Trust-wide e-mail newsletter Completion of falls risk assessments is monitored as part of our Nursing and Midwifery Patient Focused Audit; which is ongoing throughout the year: The audit #PROUD TO CARE FOR YOU wuthnhs uk @wuthnhs #proud they falling they Policy doing

Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS] NHS Foundation Trust questionnaire will be revised to take account of the requirements of the new policy. This will allow us to check that the requirements are being met and to take prompt action if they are not. hope that this letter provides assurance regarding how we manage the risk of patients suffering a fall, and identify those who are at risk: Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions regarding this case_
Sent To
  • Arrow Park Hospital NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 4 Aug 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 11th December 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of James McArdle; born 22/05/24.The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25th April 2014. The medical cause of death was a Large left sided Subdural Haematoma 11 Aortic stenosis The conclusion of the inquest was one of Accidental death:
Circumstances of the Death
The Deceased was an elderly but independent man who suffered a number of CO-morbidities. Having been admitted to hospital on 24" November 2013, he suffered falls on 5th December 2013,just under 20 hours apart: After the first fall he was assessed by medical staff;, and the observations did not indicate a CT scan was needed: After the second fall his condition was not survivable_ Evidence was heard from a senior member of the nursing staff who explained that as a patient at risk of the Deceased was given a call bell to alert staff if he wanted to leave his bed and he could be escorted, but that should he leave his bed staff on the ward would realise he was at risk of falls due to a system that involved patients wearing coloured wrist bands to signify their level of risk: This witness explained that since this incident the use of the wrist band system had been withdrawn and not replaced.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you [ANDIOR your organisation] have the power to take such action.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Pressure damage risk assessment
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Falls prevention plans

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.