Gianna Khan

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2014-0219
Date of Report 9 May 2014
Coroner Tom Osborne
Response Deadline est. 4 July 2014
All 1 response received · Deadline: 4 Jul 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The coroner raised concerns that a patient reporting a head injury was streamed to the GP clinic instead of being seen by a doctor in the A&E Department, and that the Clinical Commissioning Group had refused a full triage before streaming patients.
View full coroner's concerns
That when Gianni was taken to the A&E Department at the Hospital and reported that he had suffered a head injury he was “streamed” to be seen in the GP Clinic rather than see a Doctor in the Emergency Department. The Consultant from the Department told me, during the course of his evidence, that it would be ‘good practice’ for all suspected head injuries to be referred to the A&E Team. I was also told that the Hospital have always requested a full triage before streaming and the Clinical Commissioning Group refused to allow for such a triage.
Responses
Luton NHS Clinical Commissioning Group NHS / Health Body
Action Planned
Luton CCG will share findings with Luton Clinical Commissioning Group, LHS has accepted NICE Guidance CG176, LHS will cooperate with NHS England investigation and is resubmitting its 'Risk and Serious Incident Framework' for scrutiny, key priority will be review of emergency and urgent care commissioning arrangements. (AI summary)
View full response
[HS Luton Clinical Commissioning Group This is a response to the request from HM Coroner, Mr Tom Osborne, to provide information under Paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 Action to Prevent Future Deaths Introduction Evidence given at the inquest touching the death of Gianni KHAN revealed matters giving rise to concern to HM Coroner with regards to the 'streaming' arrangements for children with head injuries between the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital Emergency Department and the Urgent General Practitioner Clinic HM Coroner has requested that /, as Chief Officer of Luton Clinical Commissioning Group, detail any action that has been taken, or which propose to take, in line with Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013: Action to Prevent Future Deaths_ Background The Urgent GP Clinic was set up in December 2011 with the aim of providing a GP based service on the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital (LDH) site, as an element of an integrated approach to unscheduled care_ Whilst being co-located on the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital site it is independently run by Local Healthcare Solutions (LHS) and commissioned by Luton Clinical Commissioning Group (LCCG): It registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in April 2013_ The Clinic operates as a GP surgery between the hours of 08.00 and midnight, days a week, only accepting patients streamed by the hospital s Emergency Department (ED) using agreed protocols. These are patients with an urgent and unplanned healthcare requirement that necessitates a timely and direct health intervention in a primary care setting: For this integrated service, streaming protocols were developed jointly with the Luton and Dunstable University Hospitals Emergency Department Clinicians and the Commissioner (Luton Clinical Commissioning Group)_ These are regularly reviewed at the Joint Service Review Meeting: Between January and December 2013 the number of people attending the Emergency Department at the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital was 116,242 of which 37,564 were streamed to the Urgent GP Clinic streaming is undertaken by a designated nurse who is a competent Emergency Department nurse and qualified to perform this role Luton Clinical Commissioning Group fund a band post; however the nurse is employed and managed by the Hospital At the time of the incident a band 5 nurse was undertaking the streaming role as the designated nurse was taking a break On Saturday 215 December 2013 ten vear old Gianni Khan attended the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital with his mother as she was concerned for his well-being after he had suffered an accidental blow to his head. The streaming nurse, following the agreed protocol, made a judgement that no further

The

intervention would be necessary and felt that the child' $ condition be managed within a primary care setting: He was therefore 'streamed' to the Urgent GP Clinic (UGPC)_ It should be noted that streaming and triage are completely different processes, although at HM Coroner's inquest into Gianni's death, it was evident that this difference was not clearly understood: Streaming is a system whereby patients are allocated to different pathways according to their needs. All ambulatory (able to walk) patients attending the Emergency Department are given an immediate visual assessment and 'streamed' by a competent Emergency Department nurse to either remain in the Emergency Department or be directed to the primary care setting of the Urgent GP Clinic For those patients who are considered to be appropriate for assessment and treatment at the Urgent GP Clinic, the Emergency Department receptionist records patient demographic information and enters it onto SystmOne, the Clinical Registration System for Primary Care. They are not entered onto the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital Patient Information System: Triage is an initial face to face, hands-on assessment by medical or nursing staff in the Emergency Department which determines a patient's priority for treatment and informs their urgency of need for further assessment or intervention. The Luton and Dunstable University Hospital agreed to the 'streaming' of appropriate patients to the Urgent GP Clinic on the understanding that if a patient subsequently deteriorated they would be referred back to Emergency Department. Sadly, in this case, Gianni was not referred back and HM Coroner and our Serious Incident Overview Report concluded that this may have contributed to his death: Action Taken Following Gianni'$ death and the subsequent investigations by all health organisations involved, Luton Clinical Commissioning Group, carried out an assessment of the risk relating to children streamed into the Urgent GP Clinic with head injuries. This was undertaken using the Clinical Commissioning Group's risk matrix (provided for reference in Appendix A): This established that the likelihood of harm occurring to children being streamed to the Urgent GP Clinic was 'unlikely' (0.1-1%) however the consequence/impact of that harm could be 'catastrophic' (incident leading to death), which led to an assessed risk rating of 'high' In order to mitigate the risk, following the inquest on 28 April 2014 and our Serious Incident Overview Report, Luton Clinical Commissioning Group, the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital and the Urgent GP Clinic agreed to exclude the following patient groups from the streaming protocol with immediate effect: child" with a Head Injury child conveyed to Luton and Dunstable University Hospital by ambulance Babies 6 months and under Patients from within these groups are now all assessed and managed within the Emergency Department: A child in emergency medicine is defined as a person up to their 16"h birthday

could key being Any Any

Reassessment of the risk following implementation of the above actions has determined that the likelihood of harm to children is 'rare' (<0.1%) and the consequence/impact 'negligible'_ The risk rating has now been reduced to 'low'_ Additionally, Luton Clinical Commissioning Group has enhanced its monitoring of the Urgent GP Clinic by ensuring regular monthly performance (Joint Service Review) meetings_ Further An extraordinary meeting, chaired by Luton Clinical Commissioning Group and attended Action by representatives from the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital and the Urgent GP Required Clinic, was held on ZOth May 2014. The purpose of the meeting was to identify, analyse, control and evaluate any further risks associated with the streaming protocol and agree the management of those risks Luton Clinical Commissioning Group is absolutely committed to ensuring that the people of Luton receive a high quality, safe service when attending for emergency or urgent care and the following are further actions required to achieve this_ The Urgent Care Strategic Implementation Group will undertake a comprehensive review of the streaming process for both adults and children. The Luton and Dunstable University Hospital will provide information on the impact of the changes to streaming on ED activity at 3 and 6 months to Luton Clinical Commissioning Group in respect of the following: number of children presenting to the ED number of children with a head injury number of children presenting under 6 months number of children conveyed by ambulance The Luton and Dunstable University Hospital will provide head injury data analysis as requested by Luton System Resilience Group (previously Urgent Care Working Group), including a review of those cases presenting with head injury that developed into a serious/complex case: This will be analysed and acted on accordingly: Our report on the investigations into this case identified inconsistencies in use of the locally developed Clinical Assessment Tool for Head Injuries in Children: The tool was developed by Luton Clinical Commissioning Groups Children's Strategic Implementation Group and forms one of seven Paediatric Urgent Care Pathways (head injury; fever; bronchiolitis; gastroenteritis; asthma; seizures; abdominal pain) These Urgent Care Pathways are based on NICE' guidance, are submitted to NICE' $ shared learning collection and previously have been positively quality assured and published on the NICE website are scrutinised annually against any change in guidance and seek quality assurance as needed from NICE Clinical Assessment Tool for Head Injuries in Children is currently undergoing its review in line with NICE CG176 published in January 2014. A further improvement will see good version control identified on all pathways and procedural documents, to ensure the most up to date information is available and utilised. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)

They The

Based on the findings in the Serious Incident Overview Report of the incident, Luton Clinical Commissioning Group developed a list of recommendations, for both the provider organisations and the Clinical Commissioning Group itself. Luton Clinical Commissioning Group will: Undertake a comprehensive review of the streaming process for adults and children and all streaming protocols currently in place, including exclusion criteria_ Ensure that the review encompasses consideration for triage before streaming, streaming protocols and other national requirements for urgent and emergency care_ Share the Serious Incident Overview Report with the 3 healthcare providers involved in the incident and ensure it is disseminated to all front staff for review and discussion at team meetings to inform learning: Continue to improve on processes to gain assurance that Local Healthcare Solutions delivers their service against national risk management standards. Review and oversee clinical governance meetings between the Luton and Dunstable university Hospital and the Urgent GP Clinic to ensure an integrated approach and robust monitoring of service quality_ For the providers, Luton Clinical Commissioning recommends, will monitor and ensure completion on the following: Review and implement NICE CG176 with assurance to Luton Clinical Commissioning that this has been achieved. Assurance to Luton Clinical Commissioning Group on how policies and procedures are shared throughout provider organisations This must include the process for updating changes within current procedural documents_ Review of systems and organisational factors that may lead to gaps in underpinning knowledge The Serious Incident Overview Report to be disseminated to all front line staff for review and discussion at team meetings to inform learning: An action plan has been developed (appendix B) to facilitate robust monitoring of the above actions, which will be monitored through existing provider quality governance processes_ Additionally, through their own investigation of the incident; the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital agreed to the following: Refresh training for all staff involved in the streaming of patients the Emergency Department to Urgent GP Clinic Similarly, Local Healthcare Solutions have agreed and/or implemented the following: A Head Injury is now described as 'any injury above the chin including a facial injury' An information notice advising as to what services are provided in the Urgent GP Clinic has been displayed in the Urgent GP Clinic by the reception desk Local Healthcare Solutions is in the process of carrying out an audit on all its record keeping and will, when complete, share the with Luton Clinical Commissioning Local Healthcare Solutions has accepted NICE Guidance CG176 Head Injury as the only acceptable standard at the Urgent GP Clinic for managing patients

line Group Group from findings Group

presenting with Head Injuries Local Healthcare Solutions will co-operate fully with NHS England GP Performance Team during any investigation into the performance of any clinician involved in this case Local Healthcare Solutions is in the process of resubmitting its 'Risk and Serious Incident Framework' for scrutiny and evaluation to Luton Clinical Commissioning Group Quality Department Whilst the East of England Ambulance Service has agreed actions in response to their investigation findings these have not been included in this response as they do not constitute part of the streaming process_ are covered in the overarching action plan which will be monitored by Luton Clinical Commissioning Group. There are also additional actions for Luton Clinical Commissioning group to improve processes that were identified within the Serious Incident Overview Report but again do not constitute part of the streaming process_ A key priority for Luton Clinical Commissioning Group will be a thorough review of emergency and urgent care commissioning arrangements in line with the findings of this investigation and Keogh? (2013) through a longer-term piece of work This will be reflected in commissioning arrangements for 2015/16_ Luton Clinical Commissioning group will work with the relevant provider organisations to ensure all recommendations are risk assessed, actioned and implemented in with our quality governance processes and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013: Action to Prevent Future Deaths_ Keogh B. (2013) Transforming urgent and emergency care services in England Urgent and Emergency Care Review End of Phase 1 ~ Report; High quality care for all, now and for future generations_ 5 of 12 They line Page
Sent To
  • Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 4 Jul 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 2nd January 2014 I commenced an Investigation into the death of Gianni KHAN aged 10. The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 28th of April 2014. The Conclusion of the Inquest was a narrative conclusion - the medical cause of death being:

I(a) Catastrophic Neurological Injury following Traumatic Extradural Haematoma
Circumstances of the Death
Gianni Khan suffered a catastrophic head injury whilst attending a birthday party on 21st December 2013. His mother took him to the Luton & Dunstable Hospital where he was streamed to the urgent GP Clinic. On the 22nd December 2013 he was seen at home by a paramedic and was not taken to hospital. He collapsed on 23rd December 2013 whilst waiting to be seen in his GP Surgery. He was taken to the Luton & Dunstable Hospital and transferred to Addenbrooke’s Hospital where he underwent neurosurgery. He died at Addenbrooke’s Hospital on 28th December 2013. Prior to his death there was a failure to recognise the serious nature of his head injury that resulted in lost opportunities to render further medical attention.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare provision under Protect Duty
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Urgent care pathways
Review procedures for patient dispatch to hospitals
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Urgent care pathways

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.