Danuta Corbett
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2014-0150
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 29 May 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The hospital's leave policy for informal patients was not followed, and inadequate risk assessment for escorted leave, using an untrained agency worker, resulted in critical safety failures.
Responses
Action Taken
The consultant psychiatrist now carefully reviews notes taken during ward review. The Trust has reinforced with staff that should extraordinary circumstances arise again, a retrospective note must be completed, and the nurse responsible will ensure proper handovers take place in the future. (AI summary)
The consultant psychiatrist now carefully reviews notes taken during ward review. The Trust has reinforced with staff that should extraordinary circumstances arise again, a retrospective note must be completed, and the nurse responsible will ensure proper handovers take place in the future. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Miss Hamilton-Deeley Re Danuta Corbett am writing further to your report; written pursuant to the Coroners & Justice Act 2009 and the Coroner's (Investigations) Regulations 2013, regarding the Inquest in to the sad death of Danuta Corbett. The concerns your report highlight relate to our policy for leave for non detained patients and, specifically, how staff managed the leave that had been agreed for Danuta from November 2013, and how the plans made on 4 November 2013 were recorded_ We acknowledge that despite having planned to support Danuta to return home over that weekend to collect some belongings, this did not happen: The primary reason was due to difficulty releasing a member of staff during what was an extremely busy weekend. Clinicians understand that leave can be an integral part of a person's care plan and so when a patient needs to be supported by a member of staff then effort is made to facilitate this_ It is with much regret that the record keeping on Monday 4 November 2013 was so poor: Neither the detailed assessment carried out by the consultant during the ward review, nor the assessment completed by the nurse in charge shortly afterwards, were properly documented. This is a requirement of the leave policy, and a fundamental part of good clinical practice. The consultant psychiatrist has learnt a great deal from this experience. She now carefully reviews the notes taken during ward review; which are typically scribed by the junior doctor present: As you heard at the Inquest, the nurse did not make a note at all This was because the incident happened shortly after her assessment and she was so distressed by what happened that she went home and did not return to work for several It is quite normal for nursing staff to write in patient notes toward end of the shift. However, on her return the nurse ought to have written a clearly marked retrospective note_ She did not do this after being advised at the time by the acting Matron that this was not appropriate We have since reinforced with staff that should these quite extraordinary circumstances arise again then a retrospective note must be completed. Finally, it is clear that the communication with the agency nurse who was accompanying Danuta should have been much better. The nurse responsible acknowledges this and will always ensure proper handovers take place in the future. very every days. the
It seems unlikely that of the shortcomings highlighted by this very sad case would have prevented the tragic outcome_ However all the staff involved in Danuta's care have carefully reflected on what happened and used the learning to improve their practice_ hope this information is helpful and confirm that we have no objections to it shared or published by the Chief Coroner:
It seems unlikely that of the shortcomings highlighted by this very sad case would have prevented the tragic outcome_ However all the staff involved in Danuta's care have carefully reflected on what happened and used the learning to improve their practice_ hope this information is helpful and confirm that we have no objections to it shared or published by the Chief Coroner:
Sent To
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
29 May 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 11th November 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Danuta Bronislawa CORBETT The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on18th March 2014.The conclusion of the inquest was DANUTA CORBETT TOOK HER OWN LIFE WHILST DEEPLY DISTRESSED
Circumstances of the Death
See Record of Inquest CoRONERS CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern: In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you: The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows (1) The report concerns the leave policy so far as it relates to Informal Patients. (Copy enclosed refer to S.4.5 and then S.43)_ (2) Leave was considered first on 1.11.2013 when Mrs. Corbett was on 15 minute observations_ The Ward Review documents that she wants leave to go to her home to collect some papers over the next 2 ~ 3 days-Escorted leave agreed. and
No Leave occurred on 2ndor 3r November; 2013 but no reason for this is documented On the 4th she another Ward Review. She remained on 15 minute observations. As to leave, none of the matters referred to in the Policy at S.4.3 are documented in the Progress Note or in the Clinical Review or in the Electronic Note of the ward review on 4th November; In the afternoon of 4th November; Mrs. Corbett repeated her request to the Charge Nurse to go home. She was apparently Risk Assessed again and an escort was allocated: The escort was an agency health care worker who had never met the patient and had never worked on this ward before. No note by the risk assessment; or the decision to allow escorted leave was made in accordance with S.4.3 of the The patient's details and details of the reasons for her admission were not handed over to the escort; in particular neither the fact that her flatlhome was central to her distress or the fact that she had threatened to kill herself by jumping from it were known to the escort Thus none of the decisions regarding her Leave on the 4th November are documented. This patient jumped out of her 8th floor flat window at home during this escorted leave
No Leave occurred on 2ndor 3r November; 2013 but no reason for this is documented On the 4th she another Ward Review. She remained on 15 minute observations. As to leave, none of the matters referred to in the Policy at S.4.3 are documented in the Progress Note or in the Clinical Review or in the Electronic Note of the ward review on 4th November; In the afternoon of 4th November; Mrs. Corbett repeated her request to the Charge Nurse to go home. She was apparently Risk Assessed again and an escort was allocated: The escort was an agency health care worker who had never met the patient and had never worked on this ward before. No note by the risk assessment; or the decision to allow escorted leave was made in accordance with S.4.3 of the The patient's details and details of the reasons for her admission were not handed over to the escort; in particular neither the fact that her flatlhome was central to her distress or the fact that she had threatened to kill herself by jumping from it were known to the escort Thus none of the decisions regarding her Leave on the 4th November are documented. This patient jumped out of her 8th floor flat window at home during this escorted leave
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you AND your organisation have the power to take such action
Copies Sent To
Care Quality Commission Agency Nurse Hanover Care Director of Public Health Director of Quality and Primary Care
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.