Stephen Ellis

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2014-0102
Date of Report 5 March 2014
Coroner John Pollard
Response Deadline est. 30 April 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A lack of warfarin home management kits for high-risk post-heart surgery patients leads to reliance on less efficient hospital monitoring.
View full coroner's concerns
believe it would be good practice to supply warfarin home management kits to 'high risk' patients who have undergone heart surgery and are subsequently warfarinised: The cost of such kits would probably equate to, or be less than; the cost of hospital monitoring:
Sent To
  • Department of Health and Social Care
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 30 Apr 2014
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 13th November 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Stephen Ellis dob 23rd December 1953. The investigation concluded on the 4th March 2014 and the conclusion was Misadventure. The medical cause of death was Ia Haemopericardium 1b Recent aortic root graft and aortic valve replacement surgery and subsequent warfarinisation 1c Aortic stenosis and aortic root aneurysm 2 Ischaemic and hypertensive heart disease, long term haemo-dialysis due to previous nephrectomies for renal cell carcinoma. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH: The deceased was admitted to hospital for the necessary heart surgery and he was acknowledged to be a patient with significant co-morbidities_ After the surgery he was administered warfarin and thereafter there appears to have been some blood oozing from around the grafted area. When he was administered the warfarin whilst in hospital his INR levels were carefully monitored but upon his release from hospital these checks were reduced to 'weekly' and it is apparent that his INR was without this properly noted at the time. The consultant surgeon who performed the operation told me in evidence that warfarin home monitoring kits are readily available and widely used outside the UK: If Mr Ellis had had such a monitoring kit; he may have registered a higher than acceptable INR and this may have been picked up. if S0, it was the view of the surgeon, the outcome might have been different and he could have survived:
Action Should Be Taken
rising being

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action. It is essential that full information is passed promptly to the GP practice of a patient being discharged.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

IPC Structures and Transmission Risk
COVID-19 Inquiry
Patient safety governance
ICU Resource Allocation Framework
COVID-19 Inquiry
Patient safety governance
HTA require anatomy adverse incidents reported as HTARIs
Fuller Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Community Advisory Body
Infected Blood Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Patient Satisfaction in Clinical Audits
Infected Blood Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Transfusion Committees and Tranexamic Acid - England
Infected Blood Inquiry
High-risk medication monitoring
Tranexamic Acid - Scotland, Wales and NI
Infected Blood Inquiry
High-risk medication monitoring
Single consultant data repository
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Regulatory system patient safety priority
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Suspension during investigation
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.