Gareth Slater
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2014-0050
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Discharge planning failed due to clinical impasses, resulting in no care plan, insufficient family involvement, inadequate independent living assessment, and an unsuitable unfurnished flat.
View full coroner's concerns
_ The discharge planning in relation to Mr Slater was overshadowed by the impasse in clinical opinion and the length of time it took to resolve this No doubt because of the difficulties to resolve Gareth's situation there was a failure to actually carry out the important task of discharge planning: No care plan was in place for Gareth, merely a recognition of the conditions of his Community Treatment Order. There was no Section 17 discharge planning meeting_ There was no further assessment since 2011 of Gareth's ability to independently (as opposed to in supported accommodation which had failed). There was no attempt to involve Gareth's family in the discharge of Gareth There was no use of extended periods of leave for Gareth to assess his ability to manage his tenancy_ On his discharge the flat was unfurnished, without carpets and he was not able to reside there_ The condition of the flat at the time of Gareth's death remained sparsely furnished with a large water leak in the kitchen: There was no planning as to requirements Gareth may need or could be considered to help structure his day i.e. activities, etc. The discharge summary was not dictated and sent to his new outpatient Consultant until the 18th February over three months from his discharge from hospital. There were no follow up appointments in place for Gareth at the time of discharge. The renewal of his Community Treatment Order was rushed, piece of work which would normally take weeks to out was given to an Approved Mental Health Practitioner on the Friday afternoon before Gareth' s appointment at 1Oam on the Monday morning, meaning that she had just over an hour to consider the suitability of the CTO being renewed.
10. lack of a structured and considered Care Plan meant that the only person having any contact with Gareth in the Community was his Care Co-Ordinator who had only been involved with Gareth since the 8th October 2012 There was no guidance to his Care Co-Ordinator as to how often Gareth should be seen;
10. lack of a structured and considered Care Plan meant that the only person having any contact with Gareth in the Community was his Care Co-Ordinator who had only been involved with Gareth since the 8th October 2012 There was no guidance to his Care Co-Ordinator as to how often Gareth should be seen;
Sent To
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 2
56-Day Deadline
30 Mar 2014
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the Sth April 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Gareth Mark Slater date of birth 11.04.1982. The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 29th January 2014. The conclusion of the Inquest was that Mr Slater had died as a result of 1a) Drowning 1b) Multiple Injuries II) Bipolar Affective Disorder. On the 31st March 2013 the deceased, who had a history of mental illness, was found in the River Medlock having apparently fallen from Bardsley Bridge. There was no evidence found of any intention t0 end his life_ The conclusion was an open conclusion.
Circumstances of the Death
Circumstances the Inquest heard evidence that the deceased had at the age of 19 developed a severe and enduring mental illness and had been diagnosed with Bipolar Affective Disorder As a result of this he had spent substantial periods of time in hospital including a five year admission from 2007 until 2011, In addition to his mental illness the deceased also used alcohol and illicit substances which could impact on his mental health. It was noted at the Inquest that self-harming behaviour and suicidal ideation was not a feature of Gareth's mental illness_ In 2011 he had been released from hospital, low secure services, under the terms of a Community Treatment Order into supported accommodation. Within 5 weeks the deceased had been readmitted to hospital. It had been envisaged that he may need to be readmitted to hospital but that this would be for short periods of time. The deceased was readmitted into Oldham in-patient services. Following his admission there was a difference of opinion between his Clinical Team as to whether Gareth required admission back to Iw-or indeed medium-secure services or whether he could be released again on the Community Treatment Order: This impasse lasted until November 2012, some 16 months after his readmission. It was unclear from the evidence exactly when the decision was taken that Gareth would be discharged under the Community Treatment Order; however on the Sth October 2012 Gareth signed a tenancy for a flat with the help of his STAR worker and on the 22nd October 2012 Gareth's care was transferred to a different Consultant he was moved to a different Ward. In addition on the 8th October 2012 his case was given to a new care CO-ordinator. Following a Professionals meeting on the 23rd October a date of the 6th November 2012 was set by the Consultant Psychiatrist as the date of Gareth's and and discharge from hospital, Gareth was subsequently discharged and moved into his own accommodation. Following his discharge Gareth attended A&E on one occasion on the 1Sth February 2012 when he indicated that he had been using illicit substances, not complying with his medication and felt that he 'couldn't cope He was assessed and it was noted that there was no deterioration in his mental illness. He was not readmitted. On the 18th March he met with his Out Patient Consultant Psychiatrist who renewed the Community Treatment Order; In the weeks leading up to his death he had admitted to his family and his Psychiatrist that he was having some difficulties with people using his flat, On the 29th March he had been collected from his flat by his family and had stayed at his Grandmother's house: He left her house on the morning of the 30th March: It has not been established where he was until he was found 24 hours later on the 31st March; There were no witnesses to the incident:
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action: live carry The
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Prevent discharge of hospitalised children with concerns until home is safe
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require consultant or paediatrician permission for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require documented future care plan for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Ensure identified GP for children with deliberate harm concerns discharged from hospital.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Establish comprehensive counselling and support services as integral to patient care
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require every trust to provide a professional bereavement service and online information
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.