Graham Oxley

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2026-0160
Date of Report 19 March 2026
Coroner Carl Fitch
Coroner Area South Yorkshire
Response Deadline est. 14 May 2026
All 1 response received · Deadline: 14 May 2026
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Unreliable systems for immunotherapy toxicity mean urgent oncology advice is delayed by triage, and patient alert cards do not trigger a dedicated fast-track pathway for specialist care.
View full coroner's concerns
The investigation has identified that immunotherapy is being used more frequently and there are concerns about the reliable operation of systems intended to support early recognition, escalation and access to specialist care for patients experiencing serious immunotherapy toxicity. [BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) Urgent oncology advice - The Trust describes access to urgent oncology advice through a queue-based triage system and accepts that delays may occur. The response does not demonstrate how time-critical immunotherapy toxicity is reliably prioritised or escalated when delays arise.

(2) Immunotherapy alert card pathway - Patients are issued with an immunotherapy alert card intended to signal urgent risk. The Trust's response does not show that possession or presentation of an alert card triggers a distinct fast-track or priority pathway, instead linking it to the same triage arrangements. These matters create a risk of future deaths where patients experiencing immunotherapy toxicity may encounter delay in accessing specialist advice and where urgent risk signals do not result in priority assessment.
Responses
Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
Response received (text not yet extracted)
Sent To
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 14 May 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 23 June 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Graham Ian OXLEY. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 19th March 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was - Graham Ian Oxley died on 22nd February 2025 at the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield after suffering serious side effects from pembrolizumab immunotherapy given following kidney cancer surgery. The treatment caused inflammation affecting his heart, muscles and nerves, which led to worsening problems with his breathing and heart. He was treated in hospital, but his condition continued to decline and life support treatment was stopped. The cause of death was established as: 1a. Myositis, myocarditis and myasthenia gravis 1b. Complication of pembrolizumab immunotherapy II. Renal cancer
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Graham Ian Oxley was diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma and underwent radical nephrectomy in October 2024. His Post-operative recovery included wound infection and persistent numbness around the surgical site. Follow-up imaging showed no metastatic disease and he was offered adjuvant pembrolizumab immunotherapy to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Pembrolizumab was administered on 9 January 2025, and within days, Mr Oxley developed symptoms including diarrhoea, fatigue, breathlessness, weakness and later neuromuscular impairment. He made repeated attempts to obtain advice via oncology emergency contact numbers, without success. He attended emergency care but was left without diagnosis.

On 28 January 2025 he was admitted to Weston Park Hospital, appearing jaundiced with neuromuscular weakness. He rapidly deteriorated requiring intensive care. He was diagnosed with immunotherapy-related toxicity.

He received escalating aggressive immunosuppressive treatment including steroids, IVIG and abatacept. Despite treatment, his condition progressed to multi-organ failure. Following discussion with his wife and clinicians, life-sustaining treatment was withdrawn.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

UHB patient recall
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Spire patient recall
Paterson Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Expand RQIA Remit and Resources
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Principles of openness transparency and candour
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Candour about harm
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Responsibility for regulating and monitoring compliance
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Experience on the front line
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Use of information about compliance by regulator from: Quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Clarity of values and principles
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation
Make reporting of sentinel events easy using all communication means
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Patient safety governance Duty of Candour implementation

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.