Care Home Health related deaths
PFD Category
Reports: 407
Areas: 66
Earliest: Aug 2013
Latest: 15 Jan 2026
72% response rate (above 62% average). 70% of classified responses show concrete action taken.
PFD Reports
407 resultsJohn Lambton
Historic (No Identified Response)
2018-0046
14 Feb 2018
Sunderland
Dairy Lane Care Centre
Concerns summary
Care home staff, without medical training, made assumptions about a resident's health after falls, disregarded an ambulance request, and communicated insufficiently with the GP.
Mavis Reeves
All Responded
2018-0035
6 Feb 2018
Bedfordshire and Luton
First Port Retirement Property Services…
Concerns summary
The analogue Careline system caused significant delays for emergency services due to connection times, a single phone line, and key safe access issues, potentially unknown to residents.
Sandra Miller
Historic (No Identified Response)
2018-0037
25 Jan 2018
Avon
Milestones Trust
Concerns summary
Urgent action is required to stop unsafe practices with open-ended urinary catheters, establish proper management procedures, and ensure all staff are adequately trained in catheter care.
John Edwards
Partially Responded
2018-0015
10 Jan 2018
Staffordshire (South)
Independent Futures
Southwinds Care Home
Concerns summary
The care home was unable to manage complex needs, demonstrating inadequate policies for falls and pressure sores, poor record-keeping, and a failure to administer prescribed medication or seek timely medical assistance for deterioration.
Ronald Farrington
Partially Responded
2017-0494
22 Dec 2017
Surrey
Care Quality Commission
Saffronland Homes limited
Surrey County Council
Concerns summary
The care centre failed to implement specialist nursing advice, kept inaccurate records, and didn't seek medical attention for infection, exacerbated by inadequate tissue viability nurse staffing and poor CQC oversight.
Sheila Ross
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0384
21 Dec 2017
Brighton and Hove
Carlton House Rest Home
Compliance Manager
Concerns summary
The provided concerns text for this report does not detail specific safety issues or systemic failures related to the deceased's care at Carlton House Rest Home.
Francis Beech
Partially Responded
2017-0367
12 Dec 2017
Birmingham and Solihull
Heart of England NHS Trust
St Giles Care Home
Concerns summary
The hospital lacked clear guidelines for high-risk fracture management, leading to poor continuity of care and inadequate discharge planning. The nursing home also failed to implement cast care plans, monitor for infection, or train staff.
Irene Baker
All Responded
2017-0363
11 Dec 2017
Avon
Rosewood Lodge Nursing Home
Concerns summary
The care home failed to revise mobility care plans despite documented deterioration and missed monthly reviews. They also failed to escalate concerns, like inability to weight-bear, to a GP or emergency services.
Kenneth Cottam
All Responded
2017-0360
7 Dec 2017
Derby and Derbyshire
Coxbench Hall Residential Home
Concerns summary
The care home lacked clear, robust policies for falls prevention and management, which were also not consistently understood or implemented by staff. This indicates a systemic failure in falls safety.
Kathleen Devine
All Responded
2017-0411
22 Nov 2017
Manchester (West)
Arden Court Nursing Home
Concerns summary
A high-risk falls resident sustained injuries due to an unplugged falls mat, unrecorded observations, and inadequate handover information for agency staff regarding critical safety measures.
Mildred Griffiths
All Responded
2017-0400
17 Nov 2017
Birmingham and Solihull
St Giles Nursing Home
Concerns summary
The care home's pressure sore risk assessment tool (Braden Score) underestimates risk and creates confusion with a national standard, as it doesn't account for existing lesions and uses an inverse scoring method.
Steven Jones
All Responded
2017-0357
14 Nov 2017
South Yorkshire (East)
Beech Cliffe Grange Care Homes
Concerns summary
Carers' concerns were not escalated or recorded, and staff failed to appreciate the importance of incident reports for illness. Delays in calling emergency services occurred due to staff channelling medical issues through managers, who then underestimated the situation's seriousness.
John Nichols
All Responded
2017-0344
2 Nov 2017
Norfolk
Eastgate Residential Care Homes
Concerns summary
The fire drills policy lacked safeguards to adequately monitor residents, especially those with dementia, before, during, and after drills.
Ronald Brewer
All Responded
2017-0306
19 Oct 2017
Gloucestershire
Barchester Homes
Concerns summary
Inadequate administration, documentation, and dispensation processes for medications, especially palliative ones, posed risks in the care home.
Wycliffe Matthews
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0299
18 Oct 2017
Manchester (West)
Grange Care Home
Concerns summary
Care home staff lacked adequate training on hoist use and failed to maintain proper records of critical events.
Pamela Craigie
Partially Responded
2017-0279
27 Sep 2017
London (West)
Advinia Healthcare Ltd
London Borough of Hounslow
Concerns summary
The care home lacks clear criteria and staff confidence for requesting urgent 1:1 care funding from the local authority. Delays in urgent assessments and unclear interim safety plans for high-risk residents pose a significant risk.
Hedley Greenland
All Responded
2017-0235
26 Sep 2017
South Wales Central
Tynant Nursing Home
Concerns summary
Nursing staff failed to use a fluid balance chart or monitor urine output, hindering detection of critical issues. A nurse was untrained in male catheterisation, and there was a general lack of understanding and training in managing long-term indwelling catheters.
Barbara Sturgess
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0209
21 Sep 2017
Derby and Derbyshire
Ashgate House Nursing Home
Chesterfield Royal Hospital
Concerns summary
The hospital failed to promptly and formally communicate a patient's cervical spinal fracture and necessary care measures to the nursing home and GP practice, potentially jeopardizing their well-being.
Beryl Goode
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0246
29 Aug 2017
Bedfordshire and Luton
Abbotsbury Elderly Persons Home
Concerns summary
Care home night staff, lacking medical training, failed to consider a head injury as the cause of a resident's confusion after a fall, indicating a need for improved awareness and assessment training.
Joseph Tarnowski
All Responded
2017-0247
24 Aug 2017
Manchester (South)
Hillbrook Grange Residential Care Home
Concerns summary
A resident was unable to effectively use a call-bell due to potential unawareness of its portability or mobility limitations, highlighting a lack of consideration for alternative wearable alarm systems.
Maureen Colclough
All Responded
2017-0318
27 Jul 2017
Cheshire
Care Agency
Care Quality Commission
Concerns summary
Care home staff received inadequate training to recognise emergency situations and relied on presumptions when encountering an unresponsive patient.
James Harris
All Responded
2017-0334
21 Jul 2017
Birmingham and Solihull
Care First Class UK Limited
Care Quality Commission
Concerns summary
Care home staff failed to read care plans, adhere to falls protocols, and provide medical attention after a fall, compounded by poor record-keeping and an absent registered manager.
Ivy Mitchell
Partially Responded
2017-0453
18 Jul 2017
Manchester (South)
Fairfield View Care Centre
Tameside Borough Council
Concerns summary
Inaccurate falls risk documentation, poor staff understanding of risk assessments and post-fall procedures, and non-compliance with escalation processes jeopardised patient safety.
David Sheppard
Partially Responded
2017-0153
8 May 2017
Birmingham and Solihull
Boldmere Court Care Home
Care Quality Commission
Department of Health and Social Care
Concerns summary
Communication breakdowns due to poor English language skills among care staff, inadequate first aid training, poor record-keeping, and substandard post-event investigation hindered effective emergency response and learning.
Ida Toole
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0146
2 May 2017
Milton Keynes
Excel Care
Concerns summary
A high falls risk patient was denied a sensor mat based on mental capacity, demonstrating a policy requiring urgent review for potentially neglecting safety needs.