2 Response Accepted in Part

Require IRC contracts to uphold Rule 3 humane detention principles

Recommendation

The Home Office must ensure that each contract for the management of an immigration removal centre must expressly require compliance with the overriding purpose of Rule 3, which is to provide "the secure but humane accommodation of detained persons in a relaxed regime with as much freedom of movement and association as possible, consistent with maintaining a safe and secure environment, and to encourage and assist detained persons to make the most productive use of their time, whilst respecting in particular their dignity and the right to individual expression". The provisions and operation of each contract must be consistent with and uphold the requirements of the Detention Centre Rules 2001, the Adults at Risk in Immigration Detention policy and the safeguards contained in detention services orders (including those concerning the use of force).

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
- In March 2024, the Home Office stated that new contracts mandate adherence to Detention Services Orders including the Detention Centre Rules 2001 and that the overriding purpose of Rule 3 is reflected in contractual obligations (Government Response to the Brook House Inquiry, Home Office, March 2024).
- No published independent assessment of whether new contracts are materially improving conditions in line with Rule 3 principles has been identified to March 2026.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
Jurisdiction
England
Response
Accepted in Part
Accepted in Part Home Office
19 Mar 2024

New contracts mandate adherence to Detention Services Orders including the Detention Centre Rules 2001. The Home Office's Detention Services Operations Compliance and Assurance strategy for 2024 onwards is being improved to standardise processes across the detention estate.

Read Full Response
Progress Timeline
Parliamentary Answer
14 Jan 2025

Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170 (15 January 2025): 'Completed and closed as of October 2024.'

Published Evidence

Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

Mixed Findings
03 Sep 2025
HM Inspectorate of Prisons Inspection Report

Rolling refurbishment of units and upgraded library described as "relaxed and welcoming space". However, cells remain inadequately ventilated with sealed windows.

View detailed findings

Based on Independent Review of Progress visit in August 2025, following up 13 concerns from August 2024 inspection. Brook House run by Serco held 192 detainees at time of visit.

Report on an independent review of progress at Br… View Source
Insufficient Progress
19 Sep 2024
Brook House Inquiry Chair Other

Inquiry Chair Kate Eves described government response as "inadequate" and called for a "reset" with the new government. Warned abuse "becomes a question of when, not if" it happens again.

View detailed findings

In September 2024, Kate Eves told Channel 4 News she was "disappointed with what I see as an inadequate response by the former government to an important report." She noted the inquiry cost about £20 million over four years. Home Office lawyers had argued her "recommendations are not binding."

Channel 4 News interview, September 2024
Source
Report The Brook House Inquiry Report 19 Sep 2023
Responsible Bodies
Home Office Primary
Recommendation age 2.7 yrs
Last formal update 502 days ago