14 Response Accepted

Prohibit handcuffing behind back while seated

Recommendation

The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that all staff are aware that the technique of handcuffing detained people with their hands behind their back while seated is not permitted, given its association with positional asphyxia.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
- The Home Office stated in March 2024 that it had communicated to all immigration removal centre and contracted service provider staff that handcuffing behind the back while seated is not permitted (Government Response to the Brook House Inquiry, March 2024, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-brook-house-inquiry-report/government-response-to-the-public-inquiry-into-brook-house-immigration-removal-centre-accessible). - A Written Parliamentary Answer in January 2025 stated that this recommendation was completed and closed as of October 2024 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025, https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-01-14/23170).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by gemini-3-flash-preview on 25 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The evidence above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.
Jurisdiction
England
Response
Accepted
Accepted Home Office
19 Mar 2024

The government has communicated to all IRC and contracted service provider staff that the technique of handcuffing behind backs whilst seated is not permitted.

Read Full Response
Progress Timeline
Parliamentary Answer
14 Jan 2025

Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170 (15 January 2025): 'Completed and closed as of October 2024.'

Published Evidence

Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

Insufficient Progress
19 Sep 2024
Brook House Inquiry Chair Other

Inquiry Chair Kate Eves described government response as "inadequate" and called for a "reset" with the new government. Warned abuse "becomes a question of when, not if" it happens again.

View detailed findings

In September 2024, Kate Eves told Channel 4 News she was "disappointed with what I see as an inadequate response by the former government to an important report." She noted the inquiry cost about £20 million over four years. Home Office lawyers had argued her "recommendations are not binding."

Channel 4 News interview, September 2024
Source
Report The Brook House Inquiry Report 19 Sep 2023
Responsible Bodies
Home Office Primary
Recommendation age 2.5 yrs
Last formal update 435 days ago