RHI-31 Response Accepted Self-assessed

Value for Money Priority

Recommendation

Any imperative to spend a budget within a given timeframe should not be allowed to take precedence over how that budget is used and the longer term benefits and overall value of such expenditure. Ministers, Special Advisers and the Northern Ireland Civil Service all share responsibility for ensuring best practice in the use of taxpayers' money.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
According to the NI Executive Response (October 2021) and the NIAO Second Progress Report (October 2024), the priority of value for money over spending imperatives has been addressed through revised guidance, which stipulates that value for money should be a key consideration in public expenditure.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 19 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.finance-ni.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation asks for cultural or behavioural change, which is difficult to verify objectively. The assessment is based on policy commitments, not measured outcomes.
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Response
Accepted
Accepted Northern Ireland Executive
07 Oct 2021

[Note: The NI Executive responded to recommendations 19-23, 29-33 together as a group under the 'Governance and Financial Controls' theme.] NI Executive Response (October 2021): These recommendations can be accepted in full. It is important to note that public expenditure in NI is governed by the UK Budgeting rules set by HM Treasury. These rules mean that there is limited flexibility available to the Executive in some areas. Some elements are addressed in existing guidance, including the stipulation that resources should be utilised in line with regularity, propriety and value for money considerations. Funding for some specific issues may be provided by HMT on a time-limited basis. In addition the HMT public expenditure rules mean that only very limited funding can be carried forward between financial years. However, this does not override the value for money requirement. Departments have the opportunity to revise annual budget allocations through the in-year process. Value for Money is already a requirement in the NICS core competency framework. These recommendations have been addressed in work to date through: Departments' response to the lessons learned following PWC's Heat Reports; the major and fundamental Review of the Expenditure Approval and Business Case Processes, incorporating many of the recommended elements; the delivery of an online package of Public Expenditure training for both budget holders and general-service grades; the initiation of a review of MPMNI; re-establishment of DoF-led Finance Director meetings; the issue of a formal protocol for engagement with HMT. Further work is required to: give consideration to the role of Casework Committees to ensure that they are rigorous and deliver the necessary scrutiny and independence, in line with the existing role of Gateway reviews; Implementation of Five Case Model guidance; Engagement with the Treasury around 'false economies'; Consideration by DoF of the introduction of an Approval Panel for the highest cost and most complex proposals.

Read Full Response
Progress Timeline
Official Report
15 Oct 2024

NIAO Second Progress Report (October 2024): Implemented. Value for money priority over spending imperatives addressed through revised guidance.

Source
Report The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme 13 Mar 2020
Responsible Bodies
Northern Ireland Executive Primary
Recommendation age 6.0 yrs
Last formal update 525 days ago