Unable to exclude findings
Before a finding of 'unable to exclude' is led in evidence, careful consideration will require to be given to (a) the types of mark for which such a finding is meaningful and (b) the proper interpretation of the finding.
Response
Accepted
Response
AcceptedJustice Secretary Kenny MacAskill responded on 15 December 2011, the day after the Fingerprint Inquiry report was published. The Scottish Government accepted the inquiry's recommendations. MacAskill stated: "I am confident that the recommendations from this Inquiry will further enhance these services." The Scottish Police Services Authority began drawing up an action plan to implement improvements in time for integration into the new Police Scotland in 2013.
Published Evidence
Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.
Careful consideration now given to 'unable to exclude' findings before they are led in evidence. COPFS updated guidance on interpretation of fingerprint evidence.
View detailed findings
Reformed practice reflects the Inquiry's finding that fingerprint evidence is opinion evidence, not fact. Both COPFS and SPA Forensic Services adapted practices following the Inquiry.