LADB-26
Response
Historic
AI-assessed
Identify and retrospectively review locations affected by "very short duration" ambiguity
Recommendation
Areas where ambiguity in the meaning of “very short duration” may have caused, or may still cause, problems should be identified. There should be a retrospective review of all locations where this may be the case, so that appropriate action may be taken (para 11.14).
Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
No specific published evidence directly addressing the identification and retrospective review of locations affected by ambiguity in the meaning of 'very short duration' within the signal sighting standard, in connection with the Ladbroke Grove Inquiry, has been identified in the provided official sources. A general search for 'signal revise sighting' on gov.uk yielded numerous results but none specific to this recommendation or inquiry.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 19 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation requires implementation across many organisations. The assessment reflects central policy response, not adoption in individual organisations.
Jurisdiction
UK-wide
Response
Historic
Response
HistoricNo government response recorded.
Themes & Tags
Recommendation age
24.5 yrs
Last formal update
No formal updates