LADB-34 Response Historic AI-assessed

Reconsider the use of "disregard" in the SPAD Group Standard

Recommendation

The use of the word “disregard” in the Group Standard on SPADs and its associated documentation should be reconsidered (para 11.29).

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
No specific published evidence has been identified from the provided official sources regarding a reconsideration of the use of the word “disregard” in the SPAD Group Standard. The Ladbroke Grove Inquiry was published in 2000, and no recent updates or specific policy documents related to this recommendation are available in the provided search results.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 19 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
Jurisdiction
UK-wide
Response
Historic

No government response recorded.

Source
Inquiry Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Report Ladbroke Grove Inquiry — Final Report 20 Sep 2001
View Source
Themes & Tags
Rail Industry Fragmentation Staff policy awareness
Recommendation age 24.5 yrs
Last formal update No formal updates