Government response Home Office: Accepted (Mar 2024)
Delivery Cabinet Office says completed (Oct 2026)

Recommendation ANG-9: Improve vetting decision-making quality and consistency

From Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report, published 29 February 2024.

Recommendation

By March 2025, the College of Policing, in collaboration with force vetting units, should take steps to improve the quality and consistency of police vetting decision-making. This should include encouraging the use of greater professional rigour and curiosity when investigating lines of enquiry, in order to prevent those who commit sexually motivated crimes against women and those otherwise unsuitable for policing from joining the policing profession. These steps should include the following: a. Recruiting forces should be able to request that unresolved allegations discovered during vetting processes be reinvestigated. b. In collaboration with the National Police Chiefs' Council, a national vetting capability should be created, as an advisory function, to provide another layer of confidence in instances where complex vetting investigations and decisions are required. In such cases, forces should approach the national vetting function to seek proposed lines of enquiry and ensure that they are following an agreed, standardised approach when considering complex cases. c. Consideration should be given during vetting to any information or intelligence about police officers being reported missing, regardless of how quickly such reports were closed. d. Forces must ensure that force vetting units are complying with and practising Section 6.2 of the College of Policing Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting (2021), which states that force vetting units must record the results of vetting enquiries; the rationale for refusing, suspending, withdrawing or granting clearance, including with restrictions; and where adverse information has been revealed and considered. This is to ensure that an audit trail is recorded to give the force confidence in decisions made at the time and to allow future vetting officers to constructively scrutinise vetting enquiries and outcomes.

Jurisdiction: England
Reference: Recommendation 9

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the College of Policing to improve police vetting decision-making quality and consistency. In an October 2026 update, the Cabinet Office reported that the recommendation was addressed through revised Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting, published guidance on missing officers, and a National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) Vetting Hub established in April 2026 (Cabinet Office, Oct 2026). Earlier, the Angiolini Inquiry found in December 2025 that the recommendation was partially implemented, noting that an advisory national vetting capability had not yet been created (Rt Hon. Lady Elish Angiolini LT DBE PC KC, Dec 2025).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 16 Oct 2026. The record below is the sources' own words.

Government response

Accepted Home Office
25 Mar 2024
Words of: Home Office, Government accepts all recommendations made by Angiolini Inquiry, news story, 25 March 2024

The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and College of Policing has at the same time committed to addressing the remaining recommendations in Lady Angiolini's report concerning police culture and increasing the robustness of police vetting.

Earlier statement from Home Office (1)
Under consideration Home Office
29 Feb 2024
Response document: Angiolini Inquiry Part 1
Words of: Home Office, Angiolini Inquiry Part 1, news story, 29 February 2024

However, the report today highlights the need for further action and the government, in tandem with policing partners, will thoroughly consider the recommendations made by Lady Elish and respond in full in due course.

Delivery

Cabinet Office says completed (5 October 2026)

This sub recommendation has been addressed through the revised Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting

The NPCC Vetting Hub was established in April 2026 and will provide increased capability to support consistent standards, continuous improvement and effective implementation of national vetting policy and guidance across policing.

NPCC guidance has been published which considers what the service needs to do when a police officer goes missing, including the potential of triggering a vetting review and ensuring that the investigation is recorded.

This sub recommendation has been addressed through the revised Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting

From: Angiolini Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, October 2026 (data file)

Site note: The dashboard reports recommendation 9 by its sub-recommendations, a to d. Each paragraph is one sub-recommendation's cell, in that order. The dashboard gives the recommendation itself the status "See sub-recommendations" and the sub-recommendations as completed on all four; the site records it as completed only when every sub-recommendation is.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

Angiolini Inquiry (2 December 2025)

1.34 Summary of progress: This recommendation is partially implemented. While elements of Recommendation 9(c) have been addressed through guidance, this recommendation has not been fully implemented as set out in the recommendation. Furthermore, Recommendation 9(b) has not yet been implemented.

From: The Angiolini Inquiry Part 2 First Report: Prevention of sexually motivated crimes against women in public

Source

Report Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report 29 Feb 2024

Responsible bodies

College of Policing Primary

Who has spoken

  • Home Office
    Response
  • Cabinet Office
    Delivery statement
  • Angiolini Inquiry
    Finding
Recommendation made 2.7 years ago