IMB Annual Reports
768 annual reports from Independent Monitoring Boards covering 171 establishments. IMBs provide independent oversight of prisons, immigration removal centres, and secure training centres. Source: imb.org.uk.
768
Reports
171
Establishments
757
With Key Concerns
Establishment Type
Reports by Year
Key Findings
99% of IMB reports flag key concerns.
Independent monitors cover 171 establishments
across prisons, immigration removal centres and secure training centres.
Lowdham Grange
PRISON
Concerns
Self-harm: 821
Assaults: 450
Staff assaults: 261
HMP Lowdham Grange has seen some safety improvements since HMPPS took over, but faces critical challenges including six deaths in custody, widespread drug availability with high positive test rates, and a significant increase in use of force. Healthcare provision remains a major concern due to chronic staffing shortages, lack of night cover, and long mental health transfer delays. Persistent under-resourcing in probation and psychology departments impacts prisoner progression and resettlement, while the regime continues to be hampered by staffing issues and reduced social visits.
Key concerns identified
- Six deaths in custody and concerns about learning from previous Prevention of Future Deaths reports.
- Pervasive availability of illicit drugs, high positive MDT rates, and a marked increase in 'code blue' incidents posing significant safety risks.
- Major deficiencies in healthcare provision, including lack of leadership, severe staff shortages (especially mental health and night cover), and long waits for transfers and appointments.
- Significant increase in use of force and persistently high levels of assaults on staff, indicating ongoing safety challenges.
- Chronic understaffing and under-resourcing in probation and psychology departments, impacting rehabilitation, resettlement, and access to purposeful activity.
- Systemic failures in the prisoner complaints system, property management, and informing the IMB of serious incidents.
- Pervasive availability of illicit drugs, high positive MDT rates, and a marked increase in 'code blue' incidents posing significant safety risks.
- Major deficiencies in healthcare provision, including lack of leadership, severe staff shortages (especially mental health and night cover), and long waits for transfers and appointments.
- Significant increase in use of force and persistently high levels of assaults on staff, indicating ongoing safety challenges.
- Chronic understaffing and under-resourcing in probation and psychology departments, impacting rehabilitation, resettlement, and access to purposeful activity.
- Systemic failures in the prisoner complaints system, property management, and informing the IMB of serious incidents.
Lowdham Grange
PRISON
Concerns
Self-harm: 844
Assaults: 466
Staff assaults: 198
HMP Lowdham Grange was deemed not safe enough during the reporting period, with significant increases in violence, self-harm incidents, and drug availability. The operational transition and subsequent HMPPS 'step-in' contributed to an unstable and restrictive regime, compounded by staff shortages and insufficient oversight of use of force. Key concerns include inadequate healthcare provision, poor living conditions, and a lack of purposeful activity and effective resettlement support.
Key concerns identified
- The prison is not safe enough, with increasing prisoner-on-prisoner and prisoner-on-staff assaults, a rise in self-harm, in-cell fires, and significant weapons finds, influenced by readily available illegal drugs and inexperienced staff.
- Insufficient oversight and accountability for custody officers, particularly concerning the use of force, with a culture not focused on prisoner needs and support.
- The Care and Separation Unit (CSU) is overused, with too many prisoners segregated for long or very long periods without effective reintegration plans or meaningful regimes, including vulnerable ACCT prisoners.
- A lack of meaningful education programmes, full-time work, and structured on-wing activity has led to prisoners spending long periods in their cells.
- The prison complaints system was not fully effective, with significant delays or failures to respond to prisoners' written submissions and Discrimination Incident Reporting Forms (DIRFs).
- Poor living conditions persisted for the majority of the year, with the prison often filthy, strewn with rubbish, and lacking access to cleaning materials for prisoners.
- Healthcare services are under great pressure, with provision delivered to a lower standard than in the community, exacerbated by staff shortages for escorts and a lack of support for prisoners in crisis and at risk of self-harm.
- There is no dedicated resettlement staff or provision for housing support, and a failure to provide sufficient offender behaviour programmes and drug treatment courses compromises prisoner progression and risk reduction.
- Insufficient oversight and accountability for custody officers, particularly concerning the use of force, with a culture not focused on prisoner needs and support.
- The Care and Separation Unit (CSU) is overused, with too many prisoners segregated for long or very long periods without effective reintegration plans or meaningful regimes, including vulnerable ACCT prisoners.
- A lack of meaningful education programmes, full-time work, and structured on-wing activity has led to prisoners spending long periods in their cells.
- The prison complaints system was not fully effective, with significant delays or failures to respond to prisoners' written submissions and Discrimination Incident Reporting Forms (DIRFs).
- Poor living conditions persisted for the majority of the year, with the prison often filthy, strewn with rubbish, and lacking access to cleaning materials for prisoners.
- Healthcare services are under great pressure, with provision delivered to a lower standard than in the community, exacerbated by staff shortages for escorts and a lack of support for prisoners in crisis and at risk of self-harm.
- There is no dedicated resettlement staff or provision for housing support, and a failure to provide sufficient offender behaviour programmes and drug treatment courses compromises prisoner progression and risk reduction.
Lowdham Grange
PRISON
Concerns
Self-harm: 606
Assaults: 131
Staff assaults: 61
HMP Lowdham Grange experienced a challenging reporting year (Feb 2022 – Jan 2023) marked by significant contract transition and refurbishment works. This led to a deterioration in safety, increased self-harm and assaults, and a decline in staff morale and prisoner engagement. Despite some positive healthcare developments like a new wellbeing centre, services remained below community standards, compounded by staffing shortages.
Key concerns identified
- Deterioration of safety due to increased assaults, self-harm, weapons, and prevalent drug misuse.
- Significant reduction in purposeful activity and prisoners spending long periods locked in cells.
- Healthcare provision remains below community standards, exacerbated by staff shortages and lack of night cover.
- Staffing challenges, including high resignations, low morale, and reduced prisoner engagement, impacting regime delivery.
- Persistent issues with delayed coroners' inquests and property management.
- The segregation unit holding prisoners for extended periods, including those awaiting mental health transfers.
- Significant reduction in purposeful activity and prisoners spending long periods locked in cells.
- Healthcare provision remains below community standards, exacerbated by staff shortages and lack of night cover.
- Staffing challenges, including high resignations, low morale, and reduced prisoner engagement, impacting regime delivery.
- Persistent issues with delayed coroners' inquests and property management.
- The segregation unit holding prisoners for extended periods, including those awaiting mental health transfers.
Lowdham Grange
PRISON
Concerns
Self-harm: 528
Assaults: 124
Staff assaults: 79
HMP Lowdham Grange, a Category B training prison, experienced a challenging year marked by the continued impact of Covid-19 restrictions, which limited board visits and significantly affected the regime. The prison leadership was successful in controlling infections, and healthcare provision was largely efficient despite severe staffing shortages. However, the report highlights a significant increase in prisoner-on-prisoner assaults and self-harm, alongside critical concerns regarding delayed inquests, inadequate mental health transfers, and a persistent lack of resolution for property management issues during transfers.
Key concerns identified
- Significant increase in prisoner-on-prisoner assaults (almost 50%) and self-harm (10%), with four deaths in custody, meaning the prison feels less safe.
- Prisoners were not given adequate opportunities to attend adjudications in person for 11 months, raising concerns about fair treatment.
- The mental and emotional wellbeing of prisoners is a significant concern due to prolonged periods of time spent in cells.
- Healthcare staffing is critically low (60% of funded posts), leading to increased risk to wellbeing and unacceptable lack of night nursing cover.
- Significant delays in holding coroners' inquests for deaths in custody, with some families waiting four years for answers.
- Persistent and significant delays in finding appropriate treatment and secure beds for prisoners with severe mental health disorders, leading to extended segregation.
- No improvement in the management and handling of prisoners' property during transfers, causing distress and frustration.
- Continuing concerns about the availability of psychoactive and other illicit substances within the prison.
- Significant shortage of probation staff meant many prisoners did not receive sentence planning/reviews.
- Prisoners were not given adequate opportunities to attend adjudications in person for 11 months, raising concerns about fair treatment.
- The mental and emotional wellbeing of prisoners is a significant concern due to prolonged periods of time spent in cells.
- Healthcare staffing is critically low (60% of funded posts), leading to increased risk to wellbeing and unacceptable lack of night nursing cover.
- Significant delays in holding coroners' inquests for deaths in custody, with some families waiting four years for answers.
- Persistent and significant delays in finding appropriate treatment and secure beds for prisoners with severe mental health disorders, leading to extended segregation.
- No improvement in the management and handling of prisoners' property during transfers, causing distress and frustration.
- Continuing concerns about the availability of psychoactive and other illicit substances within the prison.
- Significant shortage of probation staff meant many prisoners did not receive sentence planning/reviews.
Lowdham Grange
PRISON
Concerns
Self-harm: 480
Assaults: 83
Staff assaults: 85
HMP Lowdham Grange operated a restricted regime throughout the year due to COVID-19, which impacted various aspects of prison life and the Board's monitoring capabilities. Despite these challenges, the prison was generally well-managed, maintaining safety with reduced violence, effective healthcare provision, and positive staff-prisoner relationships, though staff morale declined. Key concerns remain around mental health transfers, property management, drug availability, and the progression of IPP prisoners, as well as the overall impact of lockdown on wellbeing.
Key concerns identified
- Significant delays in finding appropriate treatment and beds in secure mental health units, leading to extended segregation for mentally unwell prisoners.
- Continued issues with the management of prisoners’ property during transfers between establishments.
- The ongoing challenge of managing the import and availability of psychoactive substances and homemade alcohol.
- Delays in the regular use and progression of body worn camera equipment by prison custody officers.
- Lack of progress in schemes supporting IPP prisoners and assisting them towards parole or release.
- The negative impact of prolonged lockdown periods on prisoners' mental health and emotional wellbeing.
- Continued issues with the management of prisoners’ property during transfers between establishments.
- The ongoing challenge of managing the import and availability of psychoactive substances and homemade alcohol.
- Delays in the regular use and progression of body worn camera equipment by prison custody officers.
- Lack of progress in schemes supporting IPP prisoners and assisting them towards parole or release.
- The negative impact of prolonged lockdown periods on prisoners' mental health and emotional wellbeing.
Lowdham Grange
PRISON
Concerns
Assaults: 116
Staff assaults: 67
HMP Lowdham Grange generally provides fair and humane treatment, evidenced by a positive regime and improved staffing stability. Violence has decreased, and healthcare provision is seeing significant improvements, although challenges remain with mental health transfers and inadequate accommodation. Concerns persist regarding property loss, the consistency of the key worker scheme, and slow progress for IPP prisoners, along with ongoing issues in education and access to local prisons for release planning.
Key concerns identified
- The loss of prisoners’ property on transfer from other prisons.
- The perception that the prisoner information and amenities committee fails to make swift progress on issues.
- Body-worn cameras are not worn as routinely as they should be by staff.
- The key worker scheme is not yet working as consistently as intended.
- Slow progress in the release of prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP).
- The unavailability of appropriate facilities for prisoners with severe mental health issues, leading to extended segregation.
- The relatively slow progress in improving education provision, including a shortfall of six tutors.
- The increasing difficulty in accessing places in local prisons for prisoners nearing release.
- The perception that the prisoner information and amenities committee fails to make swift progress on issues.
- Body-worn cameras are not worn as routinely as they should be by staff.
- The key worker scheme is not yet working as consistently as intended.
- Slow progress in the release of prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP).
- The unavailability of appropriate facilities for prisoners with severe mental health issues, leading to extended segregation.
- The relatively slow progress in improving education provision, including a shortfall of six tutors.
- The increasing difficulty in accessing places in local prisons for prisoners nearing release.