LGO Individual Decisions

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint the Council named a school which could not meet her child’s needs in their Education, Health and Care Plan. This is because we cannot investigate any matter connected to a decision that has been appealed to a tribunal.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: Miss X complained about school transport provided to her daughter (Y) and the Council’s complaint handling. We found fault in the way the taxi company provided school transport for Y on behalf of the Council. We also found fault in the way the Council responded to Miss X’s complaints. The Council has agreed to apologise, make payments to recognise Miss X’s distress and extra time and trouble spent complaining and discuss the issues raised in Miss X’s complaint with the taxi company.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about home to school transport for the complainant’s son. It is unlikely that an investigation by the Ombudsman would lead to a different outcome or give the complainant what she wants.

Summary: Mrs A complains on behalf of Mr X that the Council has not dealt with a social care assessment properly causing him distress. The Council is not at fault.

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Miss X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Mrs X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: Mrs F complained the Council failed to adhere to the statutory timescales for the Education, Health and Care needs assessment process for her son (X), and it caused delay in arranging alternative provision when he could not attend his school. The Council’s delay to complete the statutory process is a service failure, but we did not find fault in how it handled X’s alternative provision up to November 2024. The Council will apologise and make a symbolic payment to acknowledge the distress its service failure has and continues to cause Mrs F and X.

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Ms X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Miss X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

Summary: Mrs X complained that the Council has delayed in completing an Education, Health and Care Needs Assessment for her daughter, Y, within the statutory timeframes. Mrs X also says Y has missed out on education. Mrs X says this has caused both her and Y distress and frustration. We have found fault in the actions of the Council. We recommend the Councils writes to Mrs X to apologise, pays a financial remedy and completes Y’s Education, Health and Care Needs Assessment.

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Mrs X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Mrs X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council failed to arrange a suitable school placement or the special educational provision set out in her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan. These matters overlap with a SEND Tribunal appeal about her child’s Plan.

Summary: Dr X complains that the Council failed to ensure her child, Y, received the provision in his Education, Health and Care Plan. We found the Council at fault as the school delayed in putting in place some of the provision in section F of Y’s Education, Health and Care Plan. This made it harder for Y to settle into his school and disadvantaged him. The delay also caused distress to Dr X. The Council will remedy this injustice as recommended.

Summary: Ms X complains the Council failed to recognise that a malicious safeguarding concern had been raised about her, resulting in it investigating the concern and subjecting her to supervised contact with her son. The Council accepts it should have started making safeguarding enquiries when it first received the concern in December 2023 and has apologised. There is no other evidence of fault by the Council.

Summary: We have upheld this complaint because the Council delayed carrying out an Education Health and Care needs assessment for a child. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by offering to make a suitable payment to the complainant to remedy the injustice this caused.

Summary: Ms X complained the Council did not provide suitable education to her child when they were out of school and delayed updating their education, health and care plan. Based on current evidence I intend to find the Council at fault for not providing suitable education and delaying making a decision on Ms X’s child’s annual review. Ms X’s child has missed a significant amount of education. To remedy the injustice caused the Council agreed to apologise, make a payment to recognise loss of education and secure suitable provision for the child.