LGO Individual Decisions

33,513 published decisions from the Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman (Jan 2022–Feb 2026). The Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman investigates complaints about councils and registered social care providers in England. Source: lgo.org.uk.

33,513
Total Decisions
11,687
Investigated
9,465
Upheld
81%
Upheld (of investigated)
Clear

Showing 15 results matching "Rushcliffe Borough Council"

Rushcliffe Borough Council (25-009-756)
Benefits And Tax Other
Decision date: 21 Nov 2025
Subject: Council Tax
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about council tax recovery action. We cannot investigate part of the complaint as it relates to court proceedings, and the law does not allow us to consider court action. Of the parts remaining the Council has investigated and we are satisfied with the actions the Council has taken to remedy any injustice.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (25-000-387)
Planning Other
Decision date: 19 May 2025
Subject: Planning Applications
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to grant planning permission. It is reasonable to expect him to appeal.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (24-006-940)
Planning Other
Decision date: 29 Aug 2024
Subject: Planning Applications
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control and retrospective planning application. This is because the complainant has not suffered significant injustice as a result of the alleged fault. The complainant also had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (24-001-208)
Planning Other
Decision date: 13 May 2024
Subject: Building Control
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a building control matter. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve a worthwhile outcome for the complainant.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (23-016-514)
Environment And Regulation Other
Decision date: 1 May 2024
Subject: Licensing
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s taxi licensing process. The injustice caused to Mr X was the Council’s refusal to grant him a taxi licence and Mr X had the right to remedy this by way of an appeal in court.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (21-017-609)
Planning Upheld
Decision date: 1 Dec 2022
Subject: Planning Applications
Summary: Mr and Mrs B complain about the way the Council considered planning applications for development to their neighbour’s home. Mr and Mrs B say the development was larger than allowed in a green belt area. They say that to prevent loss of privacy they have needed to grow trees in their garden much higher, which in turn blocks light. They say the property is overbearing. At this stage, we find fault in how the Council considered the impact on the greenbelt and that this caused an injustice to Mr and Mrs B. However, we do not find fault in how the Council considered the impact on Mr and Mr
Rushcliffe Borough Council (22-009-077)
Benefits And Tax Other
Decision date: 3 Nov 2022
Subject: Council Tax
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about action the Council took over a late council tax payment. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and insufficient evidence of injustice.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (22-007-965)
Transport And Highways Other
Decision date: 2 Oct 2022
Subject: Parking And Other Penalties
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and then to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (22-005-576)
Adult Care Services Other
Decision date: 6 Sep 2022
Subject: Disabled Facilities Grants
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to process Ms X’s Disabled Facilities Grant. That is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (21-019-018)
Planning Other
Decision date: 19 Apr 2022
Subject: Enforcement
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to take enforcement action against her neighbours. This is because her injustice stems from a dispute with her neighbours rather than any fault by the Council and this is a private civil matter between those involved.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (21-018-076)
Planning Other
Decision date: 12 Apr 2022
Subject: Planning Applications
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
Rushcliffe Borough Council (25-017-021)
Benefits And Tax Other
· Rushcliffe Borough Council
Subject: Other
Rushcliffe Borough Council (25-015-586)
Benefits And Tax Other
· Rushcliffe Borough Council
Subject: Council Tax
Rushcliffe Borough Council (25-013-320)
Environment And Regulation Other
· Rushcliffe Borough Council
Subject: Refuse And Recycling
Rushcliffe Borough Council (25-018-548)
Planning Other
· Rushcliffe Borough Council
Subject: Other
Upheld
9,465
LGO found fault with the organisation complained about.
Not Upheld
2,222
Complaint investigated but no fault found.
Closed / Other
21,826
Closed after initial enquiries, resolved early, or withdrawn.

Investigated Decisions Over Time

Excludes 21,826 closed after initial enquiries. Quarterly, by outcome.

Annual Complaints (LGO-wide)

Official annual statistics across all organisations

Year Received Investigated Upheld Upheld %
2024-25 39,320 8,596 7,104 82.6%

Decisions by Sector

Sectors by Upheld Rate

Which sectors have the highest upheld rate?

Sector Decisions Upheld Rate
Education 5,609 3,193 57%
Adult Care Services 5,168 2,094 41%
Transport And Highways 4,050 306 8%
Housing 4,021 1,407 35%
Planning 3,380 395 12%
Children S Care Services 3,280 792 24%
Environment And Regulation 3,201 592 18%
Benefits And Tax 2,378 405 17%
Other Categories 1,968 118 6%
Health 458 163 36%

Organisation Accountability

Top 20 organisations by upheld rate (minimum 5 investigated decisions). Based on 11,687 investigated decisions (excludes 21,826 closed after initial enquiries). Benchmark: 81% average across all investigated decisions. Sparklines show annual decision volumes 2022–2026.

# Organisation Trend Investigated Upheld Not Upheld Upheld Rate vs avg
1 Care UK Community Partnerships Limited 10 10 0 100% +19pp
2 Three Rivers District Council 9 9 0 100% +19pp
3 Broxbourne Borough Council 7 7 0 100% +19pp
4 St Albans City Council 7 7 0 100% +19pp
5 Burnley Borough Council 6 6 0 100% +19pp
6 Runnymede Borough Council 6 6 0 100% +19pp
7 Adur District Council 5 5 0 100% +19pp
8 Rutland County Council 5 5 0 100% +19pp
9 Vale Of White Horse District Council 5 5 0 100% +19pp
10 Swindon Borough Council 23 22 1 96% +15pp
11 Somerset Council 129 122 7 95% +14pp
12 North East Lincolnshire Council 21 20 1 95% +14pp
13 Essex County Council 421 392 29 93% +12pp
14 Derbyshire County Council 136 126 10 93% +12pp
15 Blackpool Borough Council 14 13 1 93% +12pp
16 London Borough of Lambeth 153 140 13 92% +11pp
17 London Borough of Barking & Dagenham 59 54 5 92% +11pp
18 Warrington Council 13 12 1 92% +11pp
19 Eastbourne Borough Council 12 11 1 92% +11pp
20 London Borough of Southwark 139 126 13 91% +10pp
All-organisation benchmark 81%