LGO Individual Decisions

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a building control matter. This is because the Council’s actions have not caused Ms X significant injustice.

Summary: We cannot not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision on the level of fire detection system Mr X is required to install in his HMO (House in Multiple Occupation) property. This is because Mr X used appeal rights to the Tribunal which places the complaint outside our jurisdiction.

Summary: Mrs F complains the Council failed to take planning enforcement action after she reported breaches of planning conditions on a development site next to her home. We have found no fault in the way the Council decided not to take enforcement action.

about the Council’s decision not to remove a planning Enforcement Notice (EN) from his land, its refusal of his Certificate of Lawful Development (CLEUD) application, and its pre-application planning advice. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s retention of the EN, or of significant injustice to Mr X caused by the decision, to warrant investigation. Mr X has the right of appeal against the CLEUD refusal, which it is reasonable for him to use. There is not enough evidence of Council fault in its pre-application planning advice process, or of injustice caused to Mr X by the adv

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the grant of outline planning permission for a development near the complainant’s home. This is because the decision was made by a body out of jurisdiction.

Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s failings in its handling of a neighbour’s planning application. We will not investigate the complaint because it is unlikely we will add to the investigation already carried out by the Council and an investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her neighbour’s planning application. This is because there is no evidence to show it is to blame for the delay in Mrs X receiving her consultation letter and it properly considered the impact of the proposed development in any case.