Value for Money
Public Service Pensions
Published 19 March 2021
5 recommendations
Department for Education, Department of Health and Social Care, HM Treasury, Ministry of Defence
Commercial and financial managementFinancial sustainabilityWork, welfare and pensions
nao.org.uk
This report outlines how the public service pensions landscape has changed since the Hutton Review and highlights future challenges.
Recommendations (5)
Source: NAO Recommendations Tracker
HM Treasury
Rec 1
Accepted
Implemented
HM Treasury should:
a) develop plans to address the impact of the administrative challenge that its proposals in response to the McCloud judgment will have for employers and scheme administrators, so any changes can be implemented whilst maintaining a good level of service for members;
HM Treasury
Rec 2
Accepted
Implemented
b) resolve its concerns about the cost control mechanism and be open and transparent about the impact of any changes it makes for employers and scheme members;
HM Treasury
Rec 3
Partially Accepted
Implemented
c) in conjunction with the Cabinet Office, work closely with employers to understand how public service pensions can best support their workforce planning, to ensure pensions are an effective tool in recruiting and retaining the staff they need;
HM Treasury
Rec 4
Accepted
Implemented
d) consider government’s overall approach to ensuring that employees understand their pensions, particularly for the three million scheme members affected by the McCloud judgment who will need reliable and timely information, including from scheme administrators, to make decisions about their retirement plans; and
HM Treasury
Rec 5
Accepted
Implemented
e) consider whether broader performance measures, covering affordability and its other objectives, would give it greater assurance that it is delivering its objectives for public service pensions. For example, it could collect and analyse information regularly on the rate at which some groups are opting out of schemes.