Value for Money

Public Service Pensions

Published 19 March 2021 5 recommendations Department for Education, Department of Health and Social Care, HM Treasury, Ministry of Defence Commercial and financial managementFinancial sustainabilityWork, welfare and pensions nao.org.uk
This report outlines how the public service pensions landscape has changed since the Hutton Review and highlights future challenges.

Recommendations (5)

Source: NAO Recommendations Tracker
4
Accepted
1
Partially Accepted
5
Implemented
4
NAO Confirmed
HM Treasury
Rec 1 Accepted Implemented
HM Treasury should: a) develop plans to address the impact of the administrative challenge that its proposals in response to the McCloud judgment will have for employers and scheme administrators, so any changes can be implemented whilst maintaining a good level of service for members;
Page 12, paragraph 22, point a Q3 2023-24
HM Treasury
Rec 2 Accepted Implemented
b) resolve its concerns about the cost control mechanism and be open and transparent about the impact of any changes it makes for employers and scheme members;
Page 12, paragraph 22, point b Q4 2023-24
HM Treasury
Rec 3 Partially Accepted Implemented
c) in conjunction with the Cabinet Office, work closely with employers to understand how public service pensions can best support their workforce planning, to ensure pensions are an effective tool in recruiting and retaining the staff they need;
Page 12, paragraph 22, point c Q4 2023-24 Cabinet Office
HM Treasury
Rec 4 Accepted Implemented
d) consider government’s overall approach to ensuring that employees understand their pensions, particularly for the three million scheme members affected by the McCloud judgment who will need reliable and timely information, including from scheme administrators, to make decisions about their retirement plans; and
Page 12, paragraph 22, point d Q1 2025-26
HM Treasury
Rec 5 Accepted Implemented
e) consider whether broader performance measures, covering affordability and its other objectives, would give it greater assurance that it is delivering its objectives for public service pensions. For example, it could collect and analyse information regularly on the rate at which some groups are opting out of schemes.
Page 12, paragraph 22, point e Q4 2024-25