Value for Money
UK Research and Innovation: providing support through grants
Published 14 May 2025
5 recommendations
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Business and industryGrants and fundsMoney and taxScience and innovation
nao.org.uk
UKRI should strengthen its approach to taking bolder decisions and address data challenges to maximise value for money for the taxpayer.
Recommendations (5)
Source: NAO Recommendations Tracker · PAC follow-up below
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Rec 1
Accepted
Implemented
To help improve visibility of the government?s R&I needs and ensure they are communicated effectively, by December 2025, DSIT with UKRI should streamline the mechanisms through which the government communicates its priorities to UKRI. By the same date, they should map out government priorities and objectives whose delivery UKRI is expected to support.
UK Research and Innovation
Rec 2
Accepted
Work in Progress
It is vital that UKRI uses all available levers to ensure it is taking as much
risk as it would like to in its funding decisions to achieve strategic objectives
and to prevent missing out on high-reward opportunities. By April 2026,
UKRI should consider ways it can improve the support it provides to those
with responsibility for funding decisions. This should include:
? providing and communicating a more detailed description of its risk
appetite for funding decisions;
? providing more practical guidance on how the risk appetite should
be applied across the stages of designing and awarding grants; and
? identifying the barriers and incentives to take bolder decisions in
designing and awarding grants.
UK Research and Innovation
Rec 3
Accepted
Implemented
To enable UKRI to confidently take well-managed risks while effectively protecting public money, it needs a strong approach to funding assurance, fraud and error. By September 2026, it should ensure that the improvements it is implementing for 2025-26 have gone far enough to enable it to meet functional standards and fully address the findings raised by our financial audits.
UK Research and Innovation
Rec 4
Accepted
Work in Progress
While investing in ambitious and pioneering research, it is important for UKRI to understand how its work is providing a return on investment for taxpayers. To better understand the impact of its investments, inform future portfolio planning and position itself to most effectively harness opportunities, after the outcome of the next spending review, UKRI should develop a plan to build upon its existing programme evaluations by increasing its use of portfolio, thematic and longer-term evaluations.
UK Research and Innovation
Rec 5
Accepted
Work in Progress
By January 2026, UKRI should take stock of whether its systems are providing it with the data necessary for good portfolio management, and if not, develop a plan to improve its portfolio monitoring and strategic oversight. It should particularly consider collecting more information on activity and performance by research theme, and information to support a well-rounded understanding of how its risk appetite has played out in practice through its grant funding decisions. It should also consider whether the new systems provide enough flexibility and encourage new approaches.
Parliamentary Committee Follow-Up
The Public Accounts Committee examined this NAO report and published its own recommendations. The government responds to PAC recommendations via Treasury Minutes.
41st Report - UK Research and Innovation
Public Accounts Committee
· 23 July 2025
· 13 recommendations