Independent investigation: Nurzida Galimozanova, Brixton (2000)

London

Incident 25 Jul 2000

Subject Nurzida Galimozanova

Schizophrenic with history of drug abuse sets his grandmother alight and repeatedly stabs her.. Ind Inq 2004 – several failings in treatment

Report PDF Hundred Families

Acceptance Status

No Response Published 10

Total Recommendations 10

About this data

Acceptance Status tracks whether the trust accepted or responded to each recommendation.

Independent health investigation reports and reviews commissioned by government or NHS England.

Recommendations (10)

1 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

The panel recommends that when admissions and discharges are arranged: • the purpose of the admission is clarified through assessment and planned engagement in the hospital setting for the clinical team • the patient is informed of the purpose of … Read more

10.2 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

The panel recommends that SlaM ensure that the Risk Assessment Policy highlights the importance of obtaining all relevant information relating to the assessment of a patient, and that where this has not occurred or is not possible the reasons are … Read more

10.3 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

The inquiry panel recommend that all faxed referrals should be followed up with a telephone call to ensure that they have been received by the correct person and to verify the action taken. We agree with the Response by SlaM … Read more

10.4 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

We further recommend that a designated person is identified with clear responsibility for checking mail during leave periods.

10.5 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

The inquiry panel recognises the potential issues relating to confidentiality raised in SlaM’s response. However, in practice staff should be encouraged to distinguish between withholding information or engagement from carers and friends where that is not justified and infringes the … Read more

10.6 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

The inquiry panel recommend that this is included as part of the assessment process and that a carers assessment is always considered.

10.8 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

We further recommend that all risk assessment training is monitored and updated every three years.

2 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

The panel recommends that so far as it is possible, those engaged in an assessment: - • obtain and take into account full background information about the person’s previous psychiatric history and social circumstances • the assessment process must enable … Read more

3 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

On the evidence of the information available to the panel in this case we recommend: - • that SLaM review Dr W’s clinical performance to ensure its quality in regard to assessment, diagnosis and treatment planning • that Ms K’s … Read more

4 South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLaM)

No Response Published

Recommendation

The panel recommends that systems and procedures are clearly laid out, accessible and understood by both clinicians, and those who will refer into the teams and work in partnership with them: - • that SlaM satisfies itself that the functions … Read more The panel recommends that systems and procedures are clearly laid out, accessible and understood by both clinicians, and those who will refer into the teams and work in partnership with them: - • that SlaM satisfies itself that the functions and contributions of the different clinical teams (different now to at the time of these incidents) is understood by the referral agencies • that secure arrangements are in place to deal with referrals that may be addressed to individuals/teams are not directly responsible are identified and redirected without delay • that in circumstances where clinical staff, of all disciplines, are working in more than one setting, their clinical supervision and accountability arrangements are clear and effective • that when there is a long term agency staff member in post, a system must be developed for the clinical service lead managers to satisfy themselves as to the person’s competency, and to ensure that these staff are included and encouraged to participate in professional development • that all teams ensure that they have systems in place requiring written notes of any formal team assessments of individual service users, with recorded outcomes and purposeful management plans • the impact of excessively high bed occupancy rates on patients and their care should be understood and included in future service planning and that when occupancy rates reach an agreed threshold over 100% there are processes put in place to deal with this • that staff undertaking assessments, where both the service user and carer are present, provide the opportunity for a separate meeting to take place with each party • that notes are made of all multi disciplinary review meetings which record the discussions and decisions made • That SlaM compiles a checklist of all documents that should be secured following a Serious Untoward Incident. The panel suggests a sample checklist of: Inpatient case notes Community case notes to include medical records Medical reports for coroner/court Relevant policies and procedures current at the time of the incident Coroner’s report and judgement made at the time Staff statements made for the Trust and Police Incident forms Relevant diary, handover pages and notes of any discussions relating to the patient. Show less