NHS in England Closed After Initial Enquiries Search on PHSO website

A practice in the Liverpool area

P-001728 · Statement · Decision date: 30 January 2023
Treatment Diagnosis GP oversight of specialist care
Complaint (AI summary)
The Practice misdiagnosed Mrs A with plantar fasciitis, offered inappropriate pain treatment, and refused referrals until private treatment was sought, causing pain and anxiety.
Outcome (AI summary)
The ombudsman closed the complaint, finding no indication of fault in the Practice's treatment or referral process for Mrs A's pain.

Full decision details

The Complaint

3. Mrs H complains on behalf of her mother, Mrs A, about the care and treatment she had from the Practice between November 2020 and June 2021. She says the Practice:

• misdiagnosed her with plantar fasciitis • offered inappropriate treatment for her pain and • refused to refer her for investigations until she sought private treatment.

4. Mrs H tells us her mother experienced unnecessary pain and anxiety and is now unable to work. She feels the Practice should have referred her mother sooner, leading to an earlier diagnosis and better management of her symptoms.

5. In bringing this complaint to us, Mrs H would like the Practice to pay her mother £2,000 compensation for the money spent on private care and the distress she experienced.

Background

6. Mrs A was diagnosed with COVID-19 in October 2020.

7. On 17 November Mrs A spoke to a GP and reported breathlessness and pain in her chest, legs and heels. The GP noted Mrs A’s walking and her energy levels were okay and she did not report fever or loss of smell. The GP advised recovery could take months.

8. On 19 November Mrs A continued to test positive for COVID-19.

9. On 9 December Mrs A had an appointment with a nurse practitioner. They discussed pain in her right heel and right scapula (shoulder blade). This was not responding to painkillers. The nurse said the pain was likely musculoskeletal and suggested exercises. Mrs A asked the nurse to refer her for shoulder X-rays or to a specialist. The nurse said they did not perform X-rays on backs.

10. On 21 December Mrs A saw a GP as she was unable to move her shoulder in all directions. The GP suggested exercises for the trapezius muscle (across the back of the neck and shoulders). They also said tenderness on Mrs A’s foot was plantar fasciitis (inflammation of the band of tissue that connects the heel bone to the toes causing pain in the heels). Mrs A said she was not taking painkillers and the GP recommended paracetamol.

11. On 26 January 2021 Mrs A went to A&E and was referred to a long COVID clinic.

12. On 29 January Mrs A saw a GP as the pain in her foot had not improved. The GP recommended painkillers. Mrs A was also still experiencing ongoing breathlessness since having COVID-19 in October 2020.

13. At this stage she had already been to A&E and been referred to the long COVID clinic. The GP reviewed a CT scan (computerised tomography scan – a form of X-ray examination) from her hospital visit and said there were no signs of pulmonary embolus (a condition where one of the arteries in the lungs is blocked by a blood clot) and no problems on the right side of her heart. The CT scan showed some changes possibly caused by long COVID.

14. On 18 March Mrs A spoke to a GP about the ongoing pain in her feet. The GP discussed footwear and daily exercises. Mrs H asked the GP to send her mother for a scan to rule out DVT (deep vein thrombosis, a condition where a blood clot forms in veins, usually in the thigh or lower leg, causing pain and swelling). The GP refused to refer Mrs A as there was no evidence of DVT but said they could pursue this privately if they wished.

15. On 7 June Mrs A had an annual review with a practice nurse to discuss her diabetes and high blood pressure. Mrs A said she was not satisfied with the GP’s diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. She mentioned pains in her bones, specifically in her hands and fingers. The nurse referred Mrs A to the GP and arranged for blood tests for arthritis (a condition with swelling and tenderness of joints).

16. On 19 June Mrs A had an appointment with a consultant rheumatologist (specialising in inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis). She paid privately for this after being referred by a private hospital. The consultant noted raised blood pressure and inflammatory arthropathy (a joint disease), and possible rheumatoid disease. The consultant recommended blood tests and prescribed hydroxychloroquine (medication to treat various forms of arthritis).

17. On 3 July Mrs A had another appointment with the consultant, who told her GP she may have seronegative rheumatoid disease (a type of rheumatoid arthritis where certain antibodies are not present in the blood). The consultant recommended checking her blood every two weeks for six weeks and then monthly before a review in October. The consultant ruled out lupus (a long-term condition that causes joint pain, skin rashes and tiredness).

18. On 9 July Mrs A spoke to the GP about a referral to rheumatology.

19. On 16 July the GP made an urgent referral to rheumatology.

20. On 23 August Mrs A saw an NHS consultant rheumatologist in Liverpool. They noted no signs of inflammatory arthritis (where joints become worn down causing bones to rub together) but she met the criteria for fibromyalgia (a disorder affecting muscle and soft tissue characterised by chronic muscle pain and tenderness) and osteoarthritis (a condition causing joints to become painful and stiff).

Findings

Plantar fasciitis diagnosis

25. Mrs H says a GP dismissed her mother’s symptoms as plantar fasciitis. She says this meant Mrs A experienced unnecessary pain and did not get the help she needed.

26. In its response the Practice said Mrs A reported heel pains between 17 November and 9 December. It said on 21 December Mrs A had a face-to-face appointment with a GP who noticed the sole of her foot was tender.

27. The GP said it was likely Mrs A had plantar fasciitis. They noted Mrs A was using gel inserts, an appropriate treatment for plantar fasciitis.

28. The Practice acknowledges Mrs A reported foot pain among other symptoms between October 2020 and June 2021. It says several assessments of Mrs A’s foot suggested she had plantar fasciitis so the GP recommended treatment for this.

29. GMC guidance on good medical practice says doctors must provide a good standard of practice and care. If they assess, diagnose or treat patients they must adequately assess the patient’s conditions and examine them if necessary.

30. Doctors must promptly give or arrange suitable advice, investigations or treatment where necessary. They must refer a patient to another practitioner when this serves the patient’s needs.

31. When giving clinical care doctors must only prescribe drugs or treatment when they are satisfied these serve the patient’s needs. They must give effective treatment based on the best available evidence.

32. The NHS.UK web page on plantar fasciitis says the main symptom of the condition is pain on the bottom of the foot, around the heel and arch. It says patients can ease this themselves and recommends seeing a GP if it does not ease after two weeks.

When a patient sees a GP they will usually suggest: • resting and raising the foot on a stool • using an ice pack • wearing shoes with cushioned heels • using insoles or heel pads • regular gentle stretching exercises and • taking painkillers like paracetamol and ibuprofen.

33. If plantar fasciitis does not get better a GP may refer the patient to a physiotherapist or podiatrist. A physiotherapist can show them exercises to help ease symptoms. A podiatrist can recommend things like insoles and the right shoes to wear.

34. Mrs A’s records show she reported pain around her foot and heel between November and December 2020.

35. The first instance was on 17 November 2020 when she told a GP she had been experiencing breathlessness and pains in her chest, right heel and leg since having COVID-19 in October. The GP noted Mrs A’s energy levels were ‘ok’ and she was able to walk. They told her recovery could often take two months and to contact the Practice if she was still unwell in late December.

36. On 9 December Mrs A told a nurse practitioner she still had pain in her right heel as well as pain in her right shoulder. She told the nurse she was on her feet all day at work and walked around six kilometres a day. The nurse said the pain was likely job-related musculoskeletal pain and recommended trying exercises for around a month. Mrs A did not want to try exercises as they were too painful.

37. Mrs A spoke to a GP by phone on 15 December as her heel and shoulder were still painful. Notes from her medical records suggest the GP was already considering plantar fasciitis. The GP invited her for a face-to-face appointment on 21 December.

38. On 21 December a GP examined Mrs A’s foot and noted tenderness. We can see the GP said they considered she had plantar fasciitis, discussed the use of gel insoles and recommended taking painkillers.

39. Mrs A now has a diagnosis of fibromyalgia as well as osteoarthritis. The NHS.UK web page on fibromyalgia explains it is a long-term condition causing pain all over the body. Diagnosis can be difficult as there is no specific test to diagnose the condition. The symptoms of fibromyalgia vary from person to person and are similar to those of several other conditions.

40. The NHS.UK web page on osteoarthritis explains this condition causes joints to become painful and stiff, most often the knees, hips and small joints of the hands.

41. The NHS.UK web page on the long-term effects of coronavirus explains the most common symptoms of long COVID are: • extreme tiredness • shortness of breath • loss of smell and • muscle aches.

42. But there are lots of other symptoms people may get after a COVID-19 infection, including: • brain fog • chest pain or tightness • difficulty sleeping • joint pain and • depression.

43. In considering this complaint we obtained clinical advice from a GP (our adviser). They said it can take clinicians a long time to diagnose fibromyalgia. Typically, a patient’s path to a fibromyalgia diagnosis consists of multiple consultations about various symptoms followed by a doctor diagnosing the condition.

44. Our adviser explained fibromyalgia causes widespread pain all over the body. Other symptoms include: • brain fog • low mood • fatigue and • lack of sleep.

45. Our adviser said Mrs A’s medical records show a typical patient journey to a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Her symptoms in November and December 2020 were breathlessness, chest pains and leg and foot pain as well as shoulder pain. Our adviser noted Mrs A had COVID-19 in October, which was likely the cause of her ongoing breathlessness and chest pain.

46. Our adviser noted Mrs A’s leg, foot, and shoulder pain. They said these are symptoms of many conditions and would not necessarily lead to a diagnosis of fibromyalgia or osteoarthritis on their own. our adviser explained Mrs A had yet to report other symptoms of fibromyalgia such as brain fog and low mood. Nor had she reported joint pain in her knee, hip or hand to lead clinicians to suspect osteoarthritis.

47. The GMC guidance says doctors must adequately assess and examine patients and give suitable advice and treatment quickly.

48. We consider Mrs A’s foot pain matches the definition of plantar fasciitis. This is why the GP suggested it as a diagnosis. The GP and nurse practitioner both recommended exercise, gel insoles and painkillers. This is in line with suggested treatment for the condition.

49. We recognise Mrs A feels the GP's initial diagnosis of plantar fasciitis delayed her eventual diagnosis. We recognise she was in pain during this period and do not dismiss how frustrating it was to have to wait nine months for a correct diagnosis. But the evidence suggests Mrs A’s symptoms between November and December matched plantar fasciitis, and this is why the GP recommended treatment for this condition.

50. The evidence indicates it is common for patients with fibromyalgia to receive other initial diagnoses before clinicians rule these out. We consider the GP acted in line with GMC guidance in suggesting a diagnosis and providing advice on treatment.

51. We do not consider it was possible for clinicians to diagnose Mrs A with fibromyalgia or osteoarthritis between November and December as she did not meet the criteria for either. There is no sign the Practice got anything wrong in this aspect of the complaint.

Treatment for pain and lack of referral

52. Mrs H tells us her mother repeatedly reported pain between November 2020 and June 2021. She feels the Practice gave incorrect advice and recommended inappropriate treatment for this.

53. Mrs H says a GP told her mother to pursue private treatment. She says her mother asked clinicians to refer her for further investigations but they refused to do so until she paid for private treatment. Mrs H feels her mother should have been referred to rheumatology much sooner.

54. In its response to the complaint the Practice acknowledges there was a long delay between the onset of Mrs A’s symptoms and her getting a diagnosis. It says her symptoms started as foot and back pain and developed into other joint pains, particularly in the hand, and then pains all over.

55. The Practice says Mrs A did not mention hand pain in any consultations until June 2021. The private consultant thought she had inflammatory arthritis but an NHS consultant disagreed with this after seeing her blood results and an ultrasound (a scan using high-frequency sound waves to assess organs and structures in the body) of her joints. The NHS consultant diagnosed her with fibromyalgia.

56. The Practice says based on Mrs A’s symptoms it was reasonable for clinicians to suggest exercise. It acknowledges Mrs A felt the GP ignored important symptoms. It explains long COVID can cause many of the symptoms she reported, and the GP was aware she was waiting for an appointment with the long COVID clinic.

57. The Practice adds it was not possible for the GP to refer Mrs A to rheumatology before July 2021. This was because she did not report multiple joint pains until June. The GP made an urgent referral when she did.

58. The NHS.UK web page on fibromyalgia says there is no cure for the condition. But there are treatments to help relieve some of the symptoms and make it easier to live with the condition. Treatment tends to be a combination of: • lifestyle changes such as exercise programmes and relaxation techniques • talking therapies such as cognitive behavioural therapy and • medicine such as antidepressants.

59. Exercise has several important benefits for people with the condition, including helping to reduce pain.

60. The NHS.UK web page on osteoarthritis says it is a long-term condition and cannot be cured. Several treatments are available to reduce the symptoms. These include: • regular exercise • losing weight if someone is overweight and • wearing suitable footwear.

61. It adds if symptoms are more severe additional treatments such as painkillers and a structured exercise plan with a physiotherapist may be needed. In a small number of cases, when these treatments have not helped or damage to the joints is severe, surgery may be necessary.

62. Mrs A’s medical records show she was in touch with the Practice ten times between first reporting her symptoms on 17 November 2020 and receiving a diagnosis of fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis on 23 August 2021.

63. Mrs A saw the Practice with: • chest, leg, and heel pains in November 2020 • heel and shoulder pain in December and • continuing foot pain in January 2021.

64. The last appointment she had with a GP was on 18 March, when she talked about the ongoing pain in her feet.

65. Between November 2020 and March 2021 the GPs and nurse practitioner she saw recommended exercise, gel inserts and painkillers to help Mrs A manage her pain. The NHS recommends all these for management of symptoms associated with osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia.

66. Mrs H says in a consultation on 18 March 2021 a GP told her mother to get private treatment. During this appointment Mrs A reported mild tenderness on her heel but had no swelling or tenderness in her calf. She had no leg tenderness.

67. The records show Mrs H asked a GP to send her mother for a scan to rule out DVT. The GP refused to refer Mrs A for a scan as she showed no signs of DVT but said they could pursue this privately if they wished.

68. The NHS.UK web page on DVT explains this is a blood clot in a vein, usually the leg. It can be dangerous. Symptoms of DVT are: • throbbing or cramping pain in one leg (rarely both legs), usually in the calf or thigh • swelling in one leg (rarely both legs) • warm skin around the painful area • red or darkened skin around the painful area • swollen veins that are hard or sore when touched.

69. The NHS.UK web page on referrals for specialist care explains patients are entitled to ask for a referral for specialist treatment on the NHS. But whether they will get the referral depends on what their GP feels is clinically necessary in their case.

70. GMC guidance says doctors should examine and assess a patient’s condition and refer them to another practitioner when this serves the patient’s needs. We can see the GP examined Mrs A’s feet and legs and ruled out swelling and tenderness in Mrs A’s legs. We have seen nothing to suggest Mrs A was reporting any other symptoms of DVT.

71. We consider the GP assessed Mrs A in line with GMC guidance. We have seen nothing to suggest she had DVT so we would not expect the GP to refer her for a scan to check for this.

72. We acknowledge the GP did mention private treatment as an option. But the records show this referred to Mrs H’s request for a scan to check for DVT and not for the symptoms we now know are related to her current diagnoses.

73. Mrs A had an annual diabetic health check on 7 June 2021 with a nurse practitioner. Notes from this say ‘patient wanted to talk about her aches and pains, she is not happy with plantar fasciitis diagnosis for pain in her heels. She complains of pain in her bones, especially hands/fingers and wants a referral’.

74. Mrs A was due to have routine blood tests as part of her annual health check. Our adviser noted the nurse practitioner suggested adding tests to check for inflammatory arthritis to these. The nurse recommended Mrs A discuss her new symptoms with a GP.

75. Our adviser said the first time clinicians would have been able to consider a diagnosis of arthritis and/or fibromyalgia was during the appointment on 7 June as it was the first time Mrs A complained of widespread pain, including in her bones, hands and fingers. Our adviser explained prior to this appointment Mrs A’s symptoms did not reflect widespread pain.

76. We can see the nurse practitioner referred Mrs A back to her GP for consideration of her new symptoms. But we have been unable to confirm Mrs A asked to see a GP. She opted for private treatment, seeing a private consultant rheumatologist on 19 June and again on 3 July.

77. The private consultant assessed Mrs A, recommended blood tests and said she may have seronegative rheumatoid disease. They also prescribed medication to treat various forms of arthritis.

78. Our adviser explained in Mrs A’s case the private rheumatologist’s involvement complicated things. The private rheumatologist diagnosed her with inflammatory arthritis but this was ruled out by an NHS rheumatologist in August. Our adviser said it is likely the private consultant’s involvement delayed Mrs A’s diagnosis.

79. When Mrs A saw the NHS rheumatologist on 23 August she reported the same pains as before, but also: • brain fog • low mood • poor sleep patterns and • fatigue.

80. Our adviser explained taking the new symptoms together allowed the consultant to make a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Mrs A’s blood tests showed no signs of inflammatory arthritis, leading the consultant to make a second diagnosis of osteoarthritis.

81. We understand Mrs H feels the Practice did not effectively manage her mother’s symptoms before diagnosis. Our adviser explained it is standard medical practice to recommend exercise and painkillers for joint and muscle pain. The evidence suggests it was not possible for clinicians to diagnose Mrs A until August 2021. We consider the GP and nurse practitioner managed Mrs A’s symptoms in line with GMC guidance up to this point.

82. We have seen no signs the Practice got anything wrong in the care of Mrs A. She made the decision to pursue private treatment. We have seen nothing to suggest Mrs A asked to see a GP to discuss her developing symptoms after speaking to a nurse practitioner on 7 June.

83. On balance, we consider if she had arranged a further appointment with a GP, they could have explored her spreading pain. It is likely Mrs A would also have reported her other symptoms such as brain fog and the GP would have made the referral to a rheumatologist sooner. We consider it likely Mrs A would have received a referral had she spoken to the GP again.

84. Our adviser made it clear the typical journey to a diagnosis of fibromyalgia is long and often involves multiple interactions with clinicians. There is an overlap between symptoms of fibromyalgia and long COVID.

85. Mrs A had COVID-19 in October 2020. Her medical records show she was still testing positive on 19 November 2020. She went to the local A&E department on 26 January 2021 and was referred to the long COVID clinic. Notes from her GP consultations between 3 February and 18 March show Mrs A was still waiting for a clinic appointment.

86. There is a clear overlap between Mrs A’s symptoms and those associated with long COVID. We accept practice staff suspected she was suffering from long COVID. On balance, we consider this impression did not change until she reported widespread pain in June. The evidence suggests the GP referred her for further investigation of this pain as soon as they could.

87. We recognise Mrs A’s journey to diagnosis was long and caused her distress. We do not dismiss the impact her symptoms had on her and how frustrating it must have been not to know what was causing these. We recognise she felt the need to pursue private treatment to get answers.

88. We consider the evidence suggests the GP would have referred her for further investigation if she had arranged an appointment after her diabetic health check. There is no sign the Practice got something wrong in how it handled Mrs A’s requests for referrals.

89. We consider the Practice gave advice and treatment in line with the relevant guidance. We have seen nothing to suggest any mistake on the Practice’s part led to a delay in diagnosis. We understand our decision may be disappointing to Mrs H and Mrs A. But we hope it reassures them the Practice offered the care and treatment we would expect, despite the lengthy journey to diagnosis.

Our Decision

1. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has carefully considered Mrs H’s complaint about a practice in the Liverpool area (the Practice). We are sorry to hear about the pain and distress her mother, Mrs A, experienced during her nine-month journey to diagnosis.

2. Mrs H complains about the way the Practice treated Mrs A’s pain. She tells us a GP delayed referring Mrs A for further investigations. We have seen no sign anything went wrong in the issues Mrs H raises.

Other Decisions About A practice in the Liverpool area

P-005059 · 19 Mar 2026
Miss E complains that the Practice did not refer her dad, Mr E, to the correct Trusts to support him …
Closed After Initial Enquiries
P-004834 · 13 Feb 2026
Mr R complains the Practice incorrectly told him he had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema in April 2021. …
Closed After Initial Enquiries
P-002580 · 28 May 2024
Mrs B complains the Practice did not provide her with a timely referral to hospital in August 2022 after a …
Closed After Initial Enquiries
View all decisions for this organisation →