10. Before we decide whether we should do a detailed investigation of a complaint, we look at whether there are signs the organisation has got something wrong. We do this by comparing what should have happened with what did happen. We have done this and have not found any signs something has gone wrong.
11. Mrs R believes due to her diabetes she should have been categorised as more urgent than category 3. The Trust says it is confident she was categorised correctly based on Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS) triaging. The AMPDS is a unified triage tool used by many ambulance trusts in the UK to prioritise medical emergencies.
12. The NHS England information provides information on what types of conditions fall into which of the four available categories. Category 2, urgent calls, is for emergency conditions such as stroke or epilepsy. Category 3, which Mrs R was categorised as, includes non-life-threatening conditions and specifically includes diabetes.
13. Mrs R has pointed out diabetes can prove ‘fatal’, and we know this is true if a person’s blood sugar levels are not controlled. We have seen no sign Mrs R’s diabetes was causing any raised risk at the time of the call or afterwards while her leg was being treated. The reason for the 999 call was the broken leg, and the Trust considered Mrs R’s diabetes at the time of the call. Given the non-life-threatening nature of the injury, we have seen no sign the Trust incorrectly categorised the call, and it is clear the Trust was aware Mrs R had type 1 diabetes and considered this.
14. The Trust gave appropriate safety netting advice if Mrs R could not be moved or if she worsened. It said if she could not be moved Mrs R’s daughter should contact 111 for further assessment. Mrs R’s daughter was able to get her mother to the car with assistance, so she did not call 111 or 999 again.
15. The Trust’s response was also in line with the CSP level 3 it had implemented at that time. Mrs R was correctly categorised as a category 3 injury, and the Trust took her diabetes into account. We have seen no signs of failings in how the Trust categorised the call and how it responded.
16. We recognise this was an extremely distressing time for Mrs R and know her recovery is not over yet. We are grateful to her for taking the time and making the effort to bring this complaint to us.