12. The law says we cannot investigate a complaint where a person has (or had) the option to take legal action, unless we consider this is unreasonable in the circumstances. We have discussed this with Miss O and her mother, who is representing her with her complaint. This was to understand Miss O’s circumstances and the outcomes she wants. We do not consider whether legal action would succeed but whether it would be a reasonable option to look into.
13. We think Miss O could take legal action by making a clinical negligence claim. This is because of the potential negligence in care and treatment Miss O says she experienced and the compensation she wants.
14. We looked into whether it is reasonable for Miss O to take legal action. We considered the failings Miss O complains about, how she says she was affected and what outcomes she is looking for. Miss O would like compensation for the lack of care and for her family who experienced physical and mental effects from what happened.
15. Miss O would also like compensation for her future because she cannot complete her law degree. Miss O’s mother says Miss O is still paying university fees although she cannot complete the degree. She also says Miss O is still suffering from the damage that has been done by the overdoses, such as fits and worries about her future.
16. Miss O is not sure of the amount of compensation she would like. We discussed our approach to financial compensation with her and her mother. We also explained that the amounts of financial compensation we may recommend if we find failings are often less than what a court could achieve, because courts can consider things we cannot, such as future costs.
17. Miss O’s mother did not explicitly tell us the amounts we can recommend are too low. But she did not tell us she was happy with what we might recommend. She also mentioned they are happy to explore their options for legal action.
18. The other outcome Miss O is looking for is service improvements. While this is not an outcome a court might order, it is something that can be achieved as a by-product. This is because a Trust would be likely to make improvements to its service if it is found negligent by a court.
19. From the discussions we have had with Miss O and her mother, it seems that compensation is the primary outcome they are looking for. This also suggests it is reasonable for them to explore legal action as the next step for them.
20. We also discussed if there are any barriers to Miss O taking legal action. This included if they are in a financial position to take legal action.
21. Miss O’s mother explained they are willing to speak to a mixture of ‘no win, no fee’ solicitors and other solicitors to explore their options. This suggests the family’s financial situation is not a barrier and they have the capability to pay for legal action if necessary.
22. We have thought carefully about the circumstances of this case. For the reasons we explain above, we think it is reasonable for Miss O to explore the legal route on the grounds of clinical negligence. It is possible the legal route could provide the outcomes she is seeking, and it looks most appropriate for the compensation she would like.
23. We have discussed this with Miss O to make sure she understands the reasons for our decision. We have also advised her that, should legal action not be possible, she can contact us again.
24. If she came back to us, we would need to look at our time limit guidance and if we can investigate the complaint. We advise Miss O to come back to us as soon as possible if necessary.