7. The Health Service Commissioners Act 1993 says we cannot investigate a complaint where a person has (or had) the option to take legal action, unless we consider this is (or was) unreasonable in the circumstances. We discussed this with Mrs U to understand her circumstances and the outcomes she wants. We do not consider whether legal action would succeed but whether it would be a reasonable option to look in to.
8. It seems Mrs U could make a clinical negligence claim. We looked at whether it would be reasonable for her to do this and if it would achieve the outcomes she wants.
9. Mrs U says a financial payment is important to her for the impact this had on her. We do not recommend financial payments in the same way as a court. We would not want to disadvantage Mrs U by not giving her the opportunity to take legal action and potentially achieve a higher payment.
10. Mrs U also wants service improvements and an apology. While this is not something a court would order, often these can happen as a by-product of legal action.
11. We asked Mrs U if there were any barriers that would make it difficult for her to take legal action. Mrs U told us there are no barriers stopping her from exploring legal action. We think Mrs U should contact solicitors and provide them with the evidence she has given us. This would give a solicitor the best opportunity to fairly review any possible claim.
12. Taking legal action would mean having a dedicated solicitor or legal professional who has an interest in winning the case. That might mean Mrs U feels more supported because we are an impartial service and unable to take sides. If there are any outcomes that cannot be achieved by legal action or if Mrs U would like us to look at service improvements separately after legal action has finished, she can bring the complaint back to us.