18. Before we decide if we should do a detailed investigation of a complaint, we look at whether there are signs the organisation has got something wrong. We do this by comparing what should have happened with what did happen. We have done this and have not seen any signs that something has gone wrong.
19. Mrs O says the Practice should have diagnosed and treated her UTI much sooner than it did. She explains she had been reporting symptoms since November 2022. She also says the Practice should have tested her urine for a UTI.
20. The NICE guidance explains when a doctor should suspect a UTI. It says typical features include painful urination, passing urine more frequently, a strong desire to empty the bladder, changes in the appearance of the urine, passing urine more often than normal at night and suprapubic (lower stomach) tenderness.
21. The first time Mrs O reported symptoms that suggested a UTI was on 17 January 2023 when she says she had strong smelling urine and was passing urine more often.
22. Before this, Mrs O had reported head and neck symptoms. Our adviser explained that in line with the NICE guidance these are not symptoms of a UTI. This means we have not found anything to say that a UTI should have been diagnosed sooner than it was.
23. On 17 January 2023 the GP diagnosed Mrs O with a UTI and prescribed a course of antibiotics (nitrofurantoin 100mg one capsule twice a day for three days). Mrs O says the Practice should have tested her urine then.
24. Our adviser explained there are two types of urine testing. Dipstick testing that can be done at the Practice and laboratory testing where a urine sample is sent away for more tests.
25. The NICE guidance says the first time someone shows UTI symptoms, treatment can be based on the symptoms alone without doing urine testing. And, it explains that dipstick testing should not be used in women aged over 65 as the results are often unreliable with this patient group. The Practice’s decision not to do testing at this time was in line with this guidance.
26. Our adviser says the type of antibiotic prescribed at this time (nitrofurantoin) is the usual first line antibiotic for a UTI and was prescribed in line with the NICE guidance. Mrs O next reported symptoms of a UTI on 7 February. The Practice prescribed antibiotics (nitrofurantoin) and took a urine sample for laboratory testing. On 10 February the antibiotics were changed to pivmecillinam after the results of the urine test.
27. The GP that Mrs O saw while she was on holiday prescribed a third type of antibiotic (cefalexin). Mrs O says that after this all her symptoms, including her head and neck pain, went away. She would like to know if the GP at the Practice could have used a different antibiotic sooner.
28. We spoke to our adviser about this and they say the Practice’s prescriptions of nitrofurantoin followed by pivmecillinam when it got the urine test results, was in line with the NICE guidance. This guidance explains the first and second choice antibiotics that should be prescribed.
29. Our adviser says the cefalexin antibiotic was only prescribed after consultation with Mrs O’s GP about what they had already tried. Our adviser says this antibiotic would not be used as a first or second choice as it can increase the risk of getting clostridiodes difficile (a type of bacteria that can cause diarrhoea).
30. We understand this was a difficult time for Mrs O, she was unwell for a long time and worried there was something seriously wrong with her. We hope this information gives her reassurance that the Practice acted correctly when treating her symptoms.