7. The law says we cannot investigate a complaint where a person has the option to take legal action, unless we consider it is not reasonable for them to do so. We do not base our decision on how successful legal action would be. Rather, we consider whether legal action is a reasonable option for someone to pursue.
8. We discussed this with Mrs H’s representative to understand her circumstances and the outcomes she wants. We understand Mrs H wants the organisation to acknowledge failings, apologise and provide financial compensation. Financial compensation is something that can be pursued through legal action, specifically through a clinical negligence claim.
9. Following legal proceedings organisations sometimes also make apologies and acknowledge what went wrong. For this reason it is also possible Mrs H may obtain all her outcomes following any legal action.
10. We are generally not able to provide the same levels of financial remedy that a court can. Whilst we are able to make some recommendations for financial remedy, we consider the courts are the correct place for Mrs H to see if she can achieve the outcome she is seeking.
11. Mrs H could consider legal representation under a conditional fee arrangement, commonly known as a ‘no-win-no-fee’ basis, which would not incur any upfront costs.
12. We have considered the relevant factors and the law. Mrs H is still in time to pursue legal action. The legal route is best suited to achieve the outcomes she seeks. We do not see any barriers to prevent her from exploring this option and we think it is reasonable that she does so. We have therefore decided not to consider the complaint further.