NHS in England Closed After Initial Enquiries Search on PHSO website

Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

P-002985 · Statement · Decision date: 1 September 2024 · View Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust scorecard
Access Treatment Surgery Access Surgery Treatment Clinical negligence harms learning
Complaint (AI summary)
Mrs T complained about ongoing gynaecological care problems across multiple NHS and private organisations between 2016 and 2021, which caused her severe, lasting pain.
Outcome (AI summary)
The ombudsman closed the complaint, advising Mrs T to explore the possibility of legal action for her concerns, as a legal remedy might be available.

Full decision details

The Complaint

2. Mrs T complains about the problems she encountered under the care of the gynaecology team as an outpatient at the Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust between 2016 and 2018.

3. Mrs T complains about the problems she encountered under the care of the gynaecology team at Circle Health Group between 2019 and 2020.

4. Mrs T complains about the problems she encountered under the care of the gynaecology team at the Buckingham Healthcare NHS Trust between 2020 and 2021.

5. Mrs T tells us the impact of these concerns is significant and has caused her severe ongoing pain over a number of years and has impacted on all areas of her life.

6. As an outcome to the complaint, Mrs T is seeking a meaningful financial remedy which reflects the impact of what she has experienced.

Findings

8. The law says we cannot investigate a complaint where a person has (or had) the option to take legal action, unless we consider this is (or was) unreasonable in the circumstances. We do not consider whether legal action would succeed, but whether it would be a reasonable option to look in to. We have discussed this with Mrs T to understand her circumstances and the outcomes she wants.

9. Mrs T is looking for a financial remedy to address the long-term physical impact caused by the care and treatment she received from the NHS Trust’s involved in her care. We acknowledge the severity of the impact Mrs T has told us about, and how this continues to affect every aspect of her life. We recognise that the amount Mrs T seeks to put things right for her is significant. For this reason, we consider Mrs T has a possible legal remedy available, via a claim of clinical negligence.

10. By not signposting Mrs T to take legal advice at this time, we may be denying her a more significant and appropriate outcome from elsewhere. We understand that the costs of pursuing legal action can be a concern for some people, and so we recommend contacting the following organisations for help and support:

• The Law Society – this is the independent professional body for solicitors. They have a ‘find a solicitor’ function to find the nearest legal adviser who can help with a legal issue.

Online: www.lawsociety.org.uk/contact-or-visit-us Phone: 020 7242 1222

• AvMA – this is a UK charity for patient safety and justice. They support people affected by avoidable harm in healthcare.

Online: www.avma.org.uk/contact-us Phone: 0345 123 2352

• Advocate – this is a charity which finds free legal help from barristers.

Online: www.weareadvocate.org.uk Phone: 020 7092 3960 Email: enquiries@weareadvocate.org.uk

11. There are also strict time limits in place for pursuing a claim of clinical negligence, as the limitation period is three years from the date of knowledge. Given some of Mrs T’s concerns date back to 2016, we consider it imperative she explores her options before any additional time passes.

12. Once Mrs T has explored the legal route in full, if she is not able to pursue it for any reason, she may come back to us, and we could potentially consider it as a new complaint.

13. However, the law also says we can only consider complaints which have been brought to us within 12 months of the person becoming aware of the need to complain. So, Mrs T should approach us promptly if she cannot pursue her complaint via a legal route.

14. We appreciate Mrs T’s strength of feeling about her complaint, and we do not wish to diminish the impact she says these events have had on her. We have considered the relevant factors and the law, and we do not see any barriers to prevent Mrs T from exploring the legal option. We think it reasonable that she explores it, and we have therefore decided not to consider the complaint further at this time.

Our Decision

1. We have carefully considered Mrs T’s complaint about the above-named organisations. We consider it reasonable for Mrs T to explore the possibility of legal action on the matters she has brought to us. We will explain the reasons for our decision in this statement and provide information about what Mrs T can do next, including under what circumstances she may return to our office with her concerns.

Other Decisions About Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

P-004920 · 25 Feb 2026
Mr C complains about the care and treatment his partner, Mrs G, received from Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation …
Upheld
P-004561 · 2 Jan 2026
Mrs Y complains about the care and treatment her mother, Mrs D, received from Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation …
Partly Upheld
P-003154 · 6 Nov 2024
Miss A complains that while she was at the Trust’s emergency department she was not properly examined and was misdiagnosed …
Partly Upheld
P-003008 · 16 Sep 2024
Mrs T complains about the care and treatment she had from the Trust from April 2014 to November 2021. She …
Closed After Initial Enquiries
P-002514 · 20 Mar 2024
Ms C complains staff delayed diagnosing her father's COVID-19 illness and starting treatment. She also complains the Trust did not …
Closed After Initial Enquiries
View all decisions for this organisation →