Cancer diagnosis and referral
21. As we have seen in the background section of this report, Mr A visited the Practice four times before he was diagnosed with suspected lung cancer. The records show at the first of these appointments, on 16 February, the GP asked Mr A about any ‘red flag’ symptoms. We understand from our GP adviser these are symptoms that could indicate a serious underlying cause. The GP documented that Mr A had no ‘worrying’ symptoms such as weight loss, chest pain, coughing up blood, or night sweats.
22. The records show the GP examined Mr A and heard crackles and wheezes on both sides of his lungs. Our GP adviser said it was reasonable, based on their assessment, for the GP to reach the conclusion that Mr A had an exacerbation of COPD at this time. They said there was nothing to suggest the GP should have done more to investigate the cause of Mr A’s cough on this occasion as exacerbation of COPD was the most likely diagnosis.
23. There is evidence, from the note of Mr A’s appointment on 21 March, that the GP considered risk factors for lung cancer. The GP noted he had symptoms on only one side of his chest, and that he was, at the time, a smoker. The GP referred Mr A for a chest X-ray.
24. The NICE guidance on the management of cough tells clinicians what to consider when assessing a person with a persistent cough. It says clinicians should consider arranging a chest X-ray if a person has a chronic cough and there is uncertainty about its cause. Our GP adviser said it was appropriate for the GP to refer Mr A at this point because with these new symptoms, it no longer looked like COPD was the most likely cause.
25. On 10 April, the GP noted Mr A now had additional ‘red flag’ symptoms, including a loss of appetite, weight loss, and fatigue. At this stage, the GP planned to refer Mr A to the respiratory clinic on a 2WW pathway. However, the Trust’s referral criteria says ‘all patients should have an up-to-date chest X-ray’ before they can be referred on a 2WW lung cancer pathway. The evidence shows the GP immediately arranged for Mr A’s chest X-ray to take place urgently.
26. We cannot explain why there was a gap of nearly five weeks between Mr A’s referral for an X-ray and the date the procedure was initially arranged for. Our GP adviser said this is longer than we would expect to see within the NHS. However, this is not an indication the Practice should have done something differently. Once it had made the referral, the responsibility for arranging the appointment would have been between Mr A and the Trust.
27. As we know, the GP referred Mr A for an urgent CT scan on 2 May. The GP noted they were doing so on the basis they needed to ‘rule out’ cancer.
28. Based on everything we have looked at, we think there is evidence the GPs at the Practice considered the possibility that Mr A had cancer at each appointment between February and March 2024. We can understand that from Mrs B’s perspective nothing seemed to be happening, but the records show at each appointment a GP took action to investigate or rule out the possibility of cancer.
29. Furthermore, we are satisfied the Practice acted in line with NICE guidance when it referred Mr A for an X-ray on 21 March, and for an urgent X-ray on 10 April. We hope this reassures Mrs B.
Discharge on 28 May 2024
30. The NICE guidance on the management of COPD tells clinicians how they should assess a person with a suspected acute exacerbation, and what they should consider when deciding whether that person needs to be admitted to hospital. The guidance says to assess the severity of a person’s symptoms, clinicians should check their ‘vital signs’ (including temperature, pulse, blood pressure, and heart rate), ‘assess for confusion or impaired consciousness’ and ‘examine the chest’.
31. The records show the Trust observed Mr A’s vital signs on at least three occasions while he was in the ED. The records show these did not change significantly during this time – Mr A’s temperature, oxygen level, blood pressure, and heart rate did not get worse or better. Our ED adviser said this is evidence that Mr A’s condition was clinically stable.
32. The Trust also took blood tests and a chest X-ray while Mr A was in the ED. From the evidence we have seen, there is nothing to suggest the results of these showed signs Mr A needed emergency treatment. In addition to this, we have seen nothing to suggest the Trust assessed Mr A as having ‘confusion’ or ‘impaired consciousness’.
33. Based on Mr A’s vital signs, chest X-ray and observations, the Trust reached the conclusion that he did not require admission to hospital. Our ED adviser said there was no indication the Trust should not have reached this conclusion.
34. The NICE guidance also sets out how clinicians should treat a person with acute exacerbation of COPD, but who does not require admission to hospital. It says doctors should consider prescribing steroids and antibiotics. It also says they should arrange a follow-up to assess any changes in their symptoms. The guidance suggests clinicians should consider referring the person to a respiratory specialist should they have a serious underlying lung condition.
35. The records show the Trust prescribed Mr A steroids and the antibiotic doxycycline. Unfortunately, Mr A did not tolerate doxycycline, and it made him vomit in the ED. The Trust then changed the antibiotic to co-amoxiclav. Both antibiotics are mentioned as an appropriate choice for the treatment of an exacerbation of COPD. The records also show the Trust referred Mr A to the respiratory department for follow-up within two days.
36. Based on everything we have looked at, we are satisfied the Trust acted in line with the NICE guidance. We recognise Mrs B’s concern that the Trust discharged Mr A despite him having pneumonia, COPD, asthma, and a very recent diagnosis of suspected lung cancer. We do not doubt her account of how unwell Mr A was. We hope we have been able to reassure Mrs B the Trust assessed Mr A as it should have and discharged him with the right care in place.
Treatment for pneumonia
37. The BTS guideline for the management of community acquired pneumonia sets out the care clinicians should initially provide a person who has been admitted to hospital with this diagnosis. It says ‘all patients admitted to hospital with suspected community acquired pneumonia should have a chest [X-ray]’ to allow an accurate diagnosis. It also says clinicians should measure the person’s oxygen saturations and take blood tests.
38. The guideline says people with a confirmed diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia should be treated with antibiotics, with the first dose given while the person is still in hospital. It lists both doxycycline and co-amoxiclav as appropriate antibiotic choices.
39. As we have already seen, the Trust performed a chest X-ray and prescribed antibiotics to Mr A. It gave him the first dose in the ED. Our ED adviser said the Trust treated Mr A’s community acquired pneumonia in line with the BTS guidance.
40. We understand how worrying this time was for Mrs B and Mr A, particularly given his very recent diagnosis of suspected lung cancer. We recognise Mrs B would have wanted the Trust to do all that was necessary to treat Mr A’s pneumonia, and we hope we have been able to assure her that it provided the treatment it should have.
41. We fully empathise with how Mrs B’s life has been affected by Mr A’s rapid deterioration and sad death. We can see how much work she has put into understanding what happened and raising her complaint. We hope our statement clearly explains the reason why we cannot consider the complaint further.