40. Before we decide if we should conduct a detailed investigation of a complaint, we look at whether there are signs the organisation has got something wrong. We do this by comparing what should have happened with what did happen.
41. It is important to note that, before applying to the DRHI scheme (and until it’s closure on 31 March 2022) Ofgem strongly recommended that prospective applicants thoroughly read the DRHI Essential Guide.
42. This guide provides comprehensive information on eligibility criteria, pre-application requirements, the application process, and the ongoing obligations that participants must fulfil, once their heating system (biomass plant) is accredited.
43. The Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive Scheme Regulations 2014 (The Regulations 2014 as amended) sets out the conditions for accreditation, ongoing participation, and compliance requirements.
44. Following a desk audit, Ofgem determined that the property (property B) had been occupied for less than 183 days in year one. As a result, Mrs X had been overpaid £655.89 in ‘deemed payments’. Ofgem stated that this amount would be offset against future payments, if a meter was installed at the property.
45. Under Regulation 13 of the Regulations 2014, a meter was required to be installed, to measure the heat generation of the ASHP, in order to remain compliant with the scheme’s requirements.
46. Mrs X was notified that if a meter was not installed, the total amount repayable would be £2,541.98.
47. A site audit was subsequently conducted in February 2023, which confirmed that Mrs X was not the owner of property B. The title deed showed that the property was owned by her daughter.
48. Ofgem confirmed in its site audit findings letter dated March 2023 ‘As you do not own or occupy the property (property B) you do not meet the requirements listed in regulation 17. Occupation of a property on the Domestic RHI means occupying it as your primary dwelling. In this case, as you spend the night in [property A] you do not occupy [property B], even though you have stated that you are there during the day’.
49. As a result, Mrs X’s accreditation under the Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (DRHI) scheme was revoked under Regulation 59(2) of The Regulations 2014 (as amended). This regulation gives Ofgem the power to revoke a participants’ accreditation when it is satisfied that the original approval was based fully or partly, on information that was materially incorrect.
50. Under Regulation 17, to be eligible for accreditation and receive payments, an applicant must own and/or occupy the property.
51. As Mrs X neither owned nor lived at property B, she was never eligible for accreditation and could not lawfully receive payments, as she did not meet the eligibility requirements under Regulation 17.
52. We acknowledge that Mrs X paid for the ASHP and installation to help her daughter financially, and that she was disappointed that Ofgem ‘were not flexible’ when she asked to transfer the paperwork into her daughter's name, so that her daughter could receive the RHI payments.
53. Whilst we empathise with Mrs X’s situation and understand that she is seeking for the accreditation and payments to be transferred to her daughter, this is not an outcome that can be achieved.
54. Accreditation under the DRHI scheme must be claimed by an eligible applicant at the outset, and is granted on the basis of that individual’s circumstances, at the time of application. The scheme does not permit flexibility to change or transfer an accreditation to another person, as eligibility must be assessed at the point the application is first made.
55. As an application for the installation had already been submitted and determined, it was not possible for a new claim be made in another person’s name, nor could the existing accreditation be passed to her daughter.
56. Under our Principles of Good Administration – being open and accountable, we expect organisations to be open and truthful when accounting for their decisions. They should state their criteria for their decision making and give reasons for their decisions.
57. The evidence indicates that Ofgem clearly explained that the revocation of Mrs X’s accreditation arose from her not meeting the eligibility criteria to apply for accreditation, or receive payments.
58. Ofgem’s DRHI Essential Guide – failure to comply with ongoing obligations says, It’s important that participant’s meet the ongoing obligations, for as long as they are a participant on the scheme. Ofgem adds that if non-compliance is confirmed, it may;
•Revoke the installation’s accreditation •Recover overpayments.
59. Given the ‘non-compliance’ identified during the site audit, and in line with its guidance, Ofgem revoked Mrs X’s accreditation and sought to recover the overpayment.
60. This action aligns with both Ofgem’s responsibilities and our Principles of Good Administration - getting it right, under which we expect organisations to manage public money with care and propriety.
61. We recognise that this has been a very difficult time for Mrs X and sympathise with the impact this situation has had.
62. In summary, we have decided to take no further action on this complaint. This is because Ofgem acted in accordance with its own guidance and regulations, when reaching its decision to revoke Mrs X’s accreditation and recover the overpayment.
63. We thank Mrs X for bringing her concerns to our attention, and wish her well for the future.