Jackie Stewart-Murphy

Natural causes Report published

HMP Whatton (Prison)

Recommendations (1)
1 Accepted
Recommendation 1
The Governor should ensure that all staff undertaking risk assessments for prisoners taken to hospital understand the legal position on the use of restraints and that authorising managers show on the risk assessment that they have taken this information into account when assessing a prisoner’s current level of risk.
The Governor of HMP Whatton restraint Accepted
Response
Authorising managers undertaking risk assessments for prisoners taken to hospital have been given instructions and guidance on the need to confirm on the risk assessment form that they understand the legal position on the use of restraints, and that they have taken this into account in assessing the prisoner’s current level of risk. Guidance on the application of the Graham Judgement has also been shared with all staff who complete risk assessments for prisoners on escorts.
Full Report Text
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Independent investigation into
the death of Mr Jackie Stewart-
Murphy, a prisoner at HMP
Whatton, on 11 February 2024
A report by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
© Crown copyright, 2025
This report is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence,
visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3
Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission
from the copyright holders concerned.
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Summary
1. The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman aims to make a significant contribution to
safer, fairer custody and community supervision. One of the most important ways in
which we work towards that aim is by carrying out independent investigations into
deaths, due to any cause, of prisoners, young people in detention, residents of
approved premises and detainees in immigration centres.
2. If my office is to best assist His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) in
ensuring the standard of care received by those within service remit is appropriate,
our recommendations should be focused, evidenced and viable. This is especially
the case if there is evidence of systemic failure.
3. Mr Jackie Stewart-Murphy died of bowel ischaemia (blood flow to the intestines is
reduced or completely cut off) on 11 February 2024, while a prisoner at HMP
Whatton. He was 59 years old. We offer our condolences to his family and friends.
4. The clinical reviewer concluded that the clinical care Mr Stewart-Murphy received at
Whatton was equivalent to that which he could have expected to receive in the
community.
5. The clinical reviewer made one recommendation not directly related to Mr Stewart-
Murphy’s death which the Head of Healthcare will wish to address.
6. When Mr Stewart-Murphy was admitted to hospital in February 2024, he was
inappropriately restrained. His previous heart attack and failing health were not
properly considered.
Recommendation
• The Governor should ensure that all staff undertaking risk assessments for
prisoners taken to hospital understand the legal position on the use of restraints and
that authorising managers show on the risk assessment that they have taken this
information into account when assessing a prisoner’s current level of risk.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 1
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The Investigation Process
7. HMPPS notified the PPO of Mr Stewart-Murphy’s death on 11 February 2024.
8. NHS England commissioned an independent clinical reviewer to review Mr Stewart-
Murphy’s clinical care at HMP Whatton.
9. The PPO investigator investigated the non-clinical issues relating to Mr Stewart-
Murphy’s care.
10. Mr Stewart-Murphy did not name a next of kin and none could be identified
following his death.
11. The initial report was shared with HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS).
HMPPS did not find any factual inaccuracies.
Previous deaths at HMP Whatton
12. There were fifteen deaths from natural causes at Whatton in the three years before
Mr Stewart-Murphy’s death, two of which were because of COVID-19. There was
also a self-inflicted death. Our investigation into the death of a man in February
2021 found that restraints were inappropriately used on an older prisoner who was
in poor health.
2 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Key Events
13. On 2 February 2007, Mr Jackie Stewart-Murphy was sentenced to imprisonment for
public protection (IPP) for sexual offences. On 16 November 2012, Mr Stewart-
Murphy transferred to HMP Whatton.
14. In 2016, Mr Stewart-Murphy underwent bypass surgery for a blocked femoral artery
(major artery in the leg). He was discharged from the vascular surgeons’ clinic in
August 2016, and he was monitored annually by the healthcare team at Whatton
with blood tests and blood borne virus screening.
15. During the night of the 25 January 2024, Mr Stewart-Murphy told officers that he felt
unwell with chest pain. As HMP Whatton does not have 24-hour healthcare he was
transferred to outside hospital.
16. Before he left for hospital, prison staff completed an escort risk assessment. As
there were no healthcare staff on duty, no one completed the healthcare
assessment. Staff noted that Mr Stewart-Murphy was a low risk of escape and low
risk to the public and hospital staff. The night manager, following a telephone
conversation with the duty operational manager, authorised the use of an escort
cable (a length of strong metal cable with a handcuff at either end, one attached to
the prisoner’s wrist and the other to an officer). Mr Stewart-Murphy remained
restrained throughout his hospital stay.
17. In hospital, Mr Stewart-Murphy was diagnosed with a STEMI (a type of heart attack
caused by a blockage of the coronary artery). He returned to Whatton on the 29
January 2024, with a number of medications for his heart.
18. On 9 February, Mr Stewart-Murphy became unwell. He required oxygen to help him
breathe. Healthcare staff decided to transfer him to outside hospital.
19. Prison staff completed an escort risk assessment before Mr Stewart-Murphy left for
hospital and concluded that he should be restrained using an escort cable.
20. A nurse completed the healthcare information section of the escort risk assessment.
She stated that there were no objections to the use of restraints, that the restraints
could not cause injury or pain and that Mr Stewart-Murphy’s current state of
health/mobility did not impact his ability to escape. She noted that the restraints
may need to be removed for the hospital to conduct their investigations.
21. Mr Stewart-Murphy was treated for an ischaemic bowel and a blood clot in his lungs
and remained on an assisted breathing machine. Mr Stewart-Murphy was not
considered for surgery as it was agreed by the surgeons at Queens Medical Centre,
Nottingham, that the risk of death was too high.
22. At 7.50pm on 10 February, officers obtained permission to remove restraints due to
Mr Stewart-Murphy’s deteriorating health.
23. On 11 February, Mr Stewart-Murphy died.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 3
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
24. There was no post-mortem examination. A hospital doctor concluded that Mr
Stewart-Murphy died due to intestinal failure caused by bowel ischaemia (reduced
blood flow to the intestines).
25. Mr Stewart-Murphy did not name a next of kin and none could be identified.
4 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Findings
Restraints, security and escorts
26. The Prison Service has a duty to protect the public when escorting prisoners
outside prison, such as to hospital. It also has a responsibility to balance this by
treating prisoners with humanity. The level of restraints used should be necessary
in all the circumstances and based on a risk assessment, which considers the risk
of escape, the risk to the public and takes into account the prisoner’s health and
mobility. A judgment in the High Court in 2007 made it clear that prison staff need to
distinguish between a prisoner’s risk of escape when fit (and the risk to the public in
the event of an escape) and the prisoner’s risk when suffering from a serious
medical condition. It said that medical opinion about the prisoner’s ability to escape
must be considered as part of the assessment process and kept under review as
circumstances change.
27. Mr Stewart-Murphy was a 59-year-old man, who had a history of poor health
including a heart-attack that occurred two weeks prior to his death.
28. Between January and February 2024, Mr Stewart-Murphy was twice sent to the
hospital in a medical emergency. On the first occasion, the healthcare section of
escort risk assessment was not completed (as healthcare staff were not on duty at
the time), and an escort cable was authorised for use throughout Mr Stewart-
Murphy’s stay in hospital, despite a hospital doctor diagnosing that he had
experienced a heart attack. On the second occasion, healthcare staff completed the
medical section but did not object to the use of restraints despite Mr Stewart-
Murphy having shortness of breath that required oxygen. In hospital, prison staff
were given permission to remove the restraints a day after he was admitted.
29. Mr Stewart-Murphy’s symptoms and medical history on each of these occasions, in
line with the High Court judgement, meant that his risk could have been effectively
managed by the officers accompanying him without the use of restraints. The
decision to restrain him was not proportionate to his risk.
30. We frequently raise concerns about how well healthcare staff understand, or feel
empowered, to make a meaningful contribution to the risk assessment process,
such as in this case. In March 2024, we recommended that NHS England develop
national guidance for establishments to develop local standard operating
procedures for healthcare input into restraints risk assessments. This
recommendation was accepted, and NHS England told us that they are working
with HMPPS to review the Prevention of Escapes – External Escorts Policy
Framework, with particular focus on the escort risk assessment. This work is
planned for completion by October 2024.
31. Following the death of a prisoner in February 2021, we identified that the man had
been inappropriately restrained in hospital. In response, Whatton stated that they
would add a new section to the escort risk assessment that required the manager
completing any assessment to confirm that they had considered the Graham
judgement. This section was absent from Mr Stewart-Murphy’s risk assessments.
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman 5
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
32. We have not made any further recommendations about the use of restraints at
Whatton in the three years since this prisoner died. Nevertheless, it is important that
staff properly consider the prisoner’s age, health and mobility when determining the
appropriate use of restraints. We make the following recommendation:
The Governor should ensure that all staff undertaking risk assessments for
prisoners taken to hospital understand the legal position on the use of
restraints and that authorising managers show on the risk assessment that
they have taken this information into account when assessing a prisoner’s
current level of risk.
Inquest
33. The inquest into Mr Stewart-Murphy’s death concluded on 3 October 2024 and
returned a verdict of natural causes.
Adrian Usher
Prisons and Probation Ombudsman September 2024
6 Prisons and Probation Ombudsman
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Third Floor, 10 South Colonnade Email: mail@ppo.gov.uk T l 020 7633 4100
Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU Web: www.ppo.gov.uk
OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Case Details
Date of Death
11 February 2024
Report Published
1 August 2025
Age
51-60
Gender
Responsible Body
HMP Whatton
Recommendations
1
Inquest Date
3 October 2025
Recommendation Themes
restraint (1)